-
The redefined Lagrangian---the combination of the original Lagrangian
$ \mathcal{L} $ in the two-flavor NJL model and the corresponding Fierz transformed Lagrangian$ \mathcal{L}_F $ is given by [4]$ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} \mathcal{L}_{R} = (1-\alpha)\mathcal{L}+\alpha \mathcal{L}_F, \end{array} $
(1) where
$ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} \mathcal{L}= \bar{\psi}({\rm i} \partial /-m) \psi+ G\left[(\bar{\psi} \psi)^{2}+\left(\bar{\psi} {\rm i} \gamma^{5} \cdot \tau \psi\right)^{2}\right] \end{array} $
(2) and
$ \begin{aligned}[b] \mathcal{L}_F=& \bar{\psi}({\rm i} \partial /-m) \psi+ \frac{G}{8 N_{c}}\left[2(\bar{\psi} \psi)^{2}+2\left(\bar{\psi} {\rm i} \gamma^{5} \tau \psi\right)^{2}-2(\psi \tau \psi)^{2}\right.\\& -2\left(\bar{\psi} {\rm i} \gamma^{5} \psi\right)^{2}-4\left(\bar{\psi} \gamma^{\mu} \psi\right)^{2}-4\left(\bar{\psi} {\rm i} \gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{5} \psi\right)^{2}\\&+\left.\left(\bar{\psi} \sigma^{2 m} \psi\right)^{2}-\left(\bar{\psi} \sigma^{\mu \nu} \tau \psi\right)^{2}\right], \end{aligned} $
(3) along with the current quark masses
$m = {\rm diag}(m_u,m_d)$ .By applying the mean field approximation to the Lagrangian and dropping the irrelevant part, we get the effective Lagrangian
$ \left<\mathcal{L}_R\right>_{\rm eff}=\bar{\psi}({\rm i} \partial /-M)\psi+G\left(1-\alpha+\frac{\alpha}{4N_c}\right)\sigma^2+\frac{\alpha G}{2 N_c}n^2, $
(4) where
$ \sigma = \left<\bar{\psi}\psi\right> $ is the quark condensation, and the quark number density is$ n = \left<\psi^{\dagger}\psi\right> $ . In addition, we introduce the constituent quark mass$ M = m - 2G\left(1-\alpha+\dfrac{\alpha}{4N_c}\right)\sigma $ and the renormalized chemical potential$ \mu_r = \mu -\dfrac{\alpha G}{N_c}n $ .Thus, the corresponding thermodynamic potential density takes the form
$ \begin{aligned}[b] \Omega =& -\frac{T}{V}\ln Z = G\left(1-\alpha+\frac{\alpha}{4N_c}\right)\sigma^2 - \frac{\alpha G}{2 N_c} n^2 \\ & -\frac{N_c N_f}{\pi^2}\int_{0}^{\Lambda}{\rm d}p p^2\Bigg\{E(M,p)\\&+T \ln\left[1+\exp\left(-\frac{E(M,p)+\mu_r}{T}\right)\right] \\&+T \ln\left[1+\exp\left(-\frac{E(M,p)-\mu_r}{T}\right)\right] \Bigg\}. \end{aligned} $
(5) Here, the energy dispersion relation
$E(M,p)= \sqrt{M^2+p^2}$ and the Fermi-Dirac distribution functions$ n(p,\mu)=\frac{1}{1+\exp\left(\frac{E(M,p)-\mu}{T}\right)}, \quad \bar{n}(p,\mu)=\frac{1}{1+\exp\left(\frac{E(M,p)+\mu}{T}\right)}. $
(6) Then, the gap equations are determined by
$ \dfrac{\partial \Omega}{\partial M} = \dfrac{\partial \Omega}{\partial \mu_r} = 0 $ , which can be written into the exact forms$ \sigma + \frac{N_c N_f M}{\pi^2}\int_{0}^{\Lambda}\frac{{\rm d}p p^2}{E(M,p)} \left[1- n(p,\mu_r)-\bar{n}(p,\mu_r)\right]=0 \tag{7a}$
and
$ n- \frac{N_c N_f M}{\pi^2}\int_{0}^{\Lambda}\frac{{\rm d}p p^2}{E(M,p)} \left[ n(p,\mu_r)-\bar{n}(p,\mu_r)\right]=0. \tag{7b}$
In contrast, to calculate the meson masses, we obtain the dispersion relations for π and σ mesons in the random-phase approximation (RPA),
$ \begin{aligned}[b] &1 - 2\left(1-\alpha+\frac{\alpha}{4N_c}\right)G\frac{N_c N_f}{\pi^2}P\\& \times \int_{0}^{\Lambda}\frac{p^2}{E(M,p)}\left(1-\frac{M_{\pi}^2}{M_{\pi}^2-4E(M,p)^2}\right)\\& \times \left(1- n(p,\mu_r)- \bar{n}(p,\mu_r)\right){\rm d}p = 0, \end{aligned}\tag{8a} $
and
$ \begin{aligned}[b]& 1 - 2\left(1-\alpha+\frac{\alpha}{4N_c}\right)G\frac{N_c N_f}{\pi^2}P\\&\times\int_{0}^{\Lambda}\frac{p^2}{E(M,p)}\left(1-\frac{M_{\sigma}^2-4M^2}{M_{\sigma}^2-4E(M,p)^2}\right)\\&\times\left(1- n(p,\mu_r)-\bar{n}(p,\mu_r)\right){\rm d}p = 0. \end{aligned}\tag{8b} $
-
In this section, we calculate the numerical results for the pole masses of the π and σ mesons. Firstly, by fitting the physical pion mass
$ M_{\pi} = 137 $ MeV, decay constant$ f_{\pi} = 93 $ MeV, and quark condensate$\langle \bar{u}u\rangle =-(247)^3 \,\, \rm{MeV}^3$ , we obtain the current mass of light quarks$ m = 5.5 $ MeV, the three momentum hard cutoff$ \Lambda = 631 $ MeV, and the coupling constant$ g = 5.074^{-6} $ MeV$ ^{-1} $ in the conventional NJL model [8]. Then, the new coupling constant G in the modified NJL model is given by$ G = \frac{1+\dfrac{1}{N_c}}{1-\alpha+\dfrac{\alpha}{4N_c}}g. $
(9) The constituent quark masses M as a function of quark chemical potential μ at zero temperature but with some different weighting constants α are plotted in Fig. 1. Evidently, within our model parameters, the order of chiral phase transition changes from first order to crossover as α increases from zero: explicitly, the transitions are first-order phase transitions at
$ \alpha = 0, 0.5 $ , while they are crossover transitions at$ \alpha = 0.925,~ 1.009 $ . Hence, there must be a threshold value$ \alpha_c $ between 0.5 and 0.925 where the termination of the first-order transition happens. This has also been discussed in Ref. [4] by using different NJL parameters and is further investigated in Ref. [9] with the same parameters. Moreover, the (pseudo) critical chemical potential$ \mu_c $ at zero temperature is found to be located at approximately 354, 360, 397, and 474 MeV, respectively, by analyzing the data in Fig. 1 numerically for these four different values of α from 0 to 1.009. Notably, when$ \mu \lesssim340 $ MeV, the constituent quark mass M remains constant for all different values of α at zero temperature. As for$ \mu \gtrsim340 $ MeV, we can see that the smaller the value of α, the faster the decrease in constituent quark mass. Therefore, the (approximate) chiral symmetry will be fully restored at a larger chemical potential when α increases.Figure 1. (color online) Constituent quark mass M as a function of the chemical potential μ at
$ T = 0 $ and$ \alpha = $ 0, 0.5, 0.925 and 1.009, respectively.The pole masses of π and σ mesons as functions of quark chemical potential at zero temperature are given in Fig. 2, obtained by Eqs. (8a) and (8b) with different weighting constants α. Note that, when
$ \alpha = 0 $ , our results coincide with the previous results in the conventional mean field approximation [8]. Similar to the constituent quark mass, the meson masses keep constant as long as the chemical potential is smaller than$ 340 $ MeV. When the chemical potential reaches$ 340 $ MeV, the pion mass begins to increase with μ, while the σ meson mass decreases first and then increases. Moreover, in the region of$ \mu \gtrsim340 $ MeV, the smaller the value of α, the faster the change in meson masses. In addition, there is a jump at$ \mu_c $ for small α values where a first-order chiral phase transition happens.Figure 2. (color online) Pole masses of pion (left panel) and σ meson (right panel) as functions of chemical potential at
$ T = 0 $ and$ \alpha = $ 0, 0.5, 0.925 and 1.009.The pole masses of π and σ mesons, as well as twice the constituent quark mass for some selected α, are plotted in Fig. 3. Note that the Mott chemical potential is defined by
$ M_{\pi}(\mu_{\rm Mott}) = 2M(\mu_{\rm Mott}) $ . The Mott transition is the signification where pions dissociate to the unbound resonance state. As discussed in Ref. [10], when the chiral phase transition is a smooth crossover, instead of the definition of the pseudo critical point, the Mott transition point is a better way to characterize the chiral crossover. In our case, when α is small,$\mu_{\rm Mott}$ and$ \mu_c $ are almost identical. When α is large,$\mu_{\rm Mott} > \mu_c$ , and the differences are larger when α is larger ($\mu_{\rm Mott} = 354,\; 360,\; 420\; \text{and}\; 519$ MeV for$ \alpha = 0,\; 0.5,\; 0.925\; \text{and}\; 1.009 $ , respectively). The smoother the phase transition (α is larger in our model), the larger the difference between$\mu_{\rm Mott}$ and$ \mu_c $ . For the σ meson, the dissociation chemical potential is defined as$ m_{\sigma}(\mu_d) = 2m_{\pi}(\mu_d) $ . From our data,$ \mu_d =354,\; 360,\; 402,\; 483 $ MeV for$ \alpha = 0,\; 0.5,\; 0.925\; \text{and}\; 1.009 $ , respectively. The difference between$ \mu_d $ and$ \mu_c $ is also enhanced when α increases, but the difference is small even when α is larger than 1. At a very large chemical potential, the pole mass of the σ meson and pion are almost identical (they are the same in the chiral limit, while for the current massive light quark mass,$ M_{\pi}^2 = M_{\sigma}^2 - 4 m^2 $ ). Evidently, the larger the value of α, the larger the chemical potential needed to attain such a feature.Figure 3. (color online) Pole masses of σ meson and pion and twice the constituent quark mass as functions of chemical potential at
$ T = 0 $ and$ \alpha\; =\; 0,\; 0.5,\; 0.925\; \text{and}\; 1.009 $ .To further clarify the impact of α on the Mott chemical potential and dissociation chemical potential, we plot them as functions of α in Fig. 4. The Mott chemical potential and the dissociation chemical potential are shown in the left and right panels, respectively. Both functions display an exponential increase with α. Additionally, the Mott chemical potential is higher than the dissociation chemical potential for large values of α. These results support the discussion presented in the previous paragraph.
Figure 4. (color online) Mott chemical potential (left panel) and dissociation chemical potential (right panel) as functions of α.
Additionally, for the finite temperature case, the only difference from the zero temperature case is that the first-order phase transition regime becomes smaller as the temperature increases. The discontinuity in the meson masses disappears for all values of α above a certain temperature. We demonstrate this by plotting the pion and σ meson masses at a temperature of
$ T = 100 $ MeV in Fig. 5. Our model predicts that, at this temperature, the phase transition is a crossover for all values of α. The meson masses do not exhibit a "jump" as a function of the chemical potential, and the rest of the physical behaviors coincide with our zero-temperature results.
(Pseudo) Scalar mesons in a self-consistent NJL model
- Received Date: 2023-06-08
- Available Online: 2023-12-15
Abstract: In this study, we investigate the mass spectra of π and σ mesons at finite chemical potential using the self-consistent NJL model and the Fierz-transformed interaction Lagrangian. The model introduces an arbitrary parameter α to reflect the weights of the Fierz-transformed interaction channels. We show that, when α exceeds a certain threshold value, the chiral phase transition transforms from a first-order one to a smooth crossover, which is evident from the behaviors of the chiral condensates and meson masses. Additionally, at a high chemical potential, the smaller the value of α, the higher the masses of the π and σ mesons. Moreover, the Mott and dissociation chemical potentials increase with the increase in α. Thus, the meson mass emerges as a valuable experimental observable for determining the value of α and investigating the properties of the chiral phase transition in dense QCD matter.