Static versus energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus} potential for description of sub-barrier fusion dynamics of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions

  • The static and energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus potentials are simultaneously used along with the Wong formula for exploration of fusion dynamics of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions. The role of internal structure degrees of freedom of colliding pairs, such as inelastic surface vibrations, are examined within the context of coupled channel calculations performed using the code CCFULL. Theoretical calculations based on the static Woods-Saxon potential along with the one-dimensional Wong formula fail to address the fusion data of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions. Such discrepancies can be removed if one uses couplings to internal structure degrees of freedom of colliding nuclei. However, the energy-dependent Woods-Saxon potential model (EDWSP model) accurately describes the sub-barrier fusion enhancement of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions. Therefore, in sub-barrier fusion dynamics, energy dependence in the nucleus-nucleus potential governs barrier modification effects in a closely similar way to that of the coupled channel approach.
      PCAS:
  • 加载中
  • [1] Beckerman M. Rep. Prog. Phys., 1988, 51: 1047
    [2] Reisdorf W. J. Phys. G, 1994, 20: 1297
    [3] Dasgupta M et al. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 1998, 48: 401
    [4] Balantekin A B, Takigawa N. Rev. Mod. Phys., 1988, 70: 77
    [5] Canto L F et al. Phys. Rep., 2006, 424: 1
    [6] Hagino K, Takigawa N. Prog. Theor. Phys., 2012, 128: 1061
    [7] Back B B et al. Rev. Mod. Phys., 2014, 86: 317
    [8] Timmers H et al. Phys. Lett. B, 1997, 399: 35
    [9] Trotta M et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 65: 011601
    [10] Stefanini A M et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 76: 014610
    [11] Leigh J R et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1995, 52: 3151
    [12] Prasad N V S V et al. Nucl. Phys. A, 1996, 603: 176
    [13] ZHANG H Q et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2010, 82: 054609
    [14] Newton J O et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 64: 064608
    [15] Sonzogni A A et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1998, 57: 722
    [16] Dasso C H, Pollarolo G. Phys. Rev. C, 2003, 68: 054604
    [17] Hagino K et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2003, 67: 054603
    [18] Sagaidak R N et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 76: 034605
    [19] WANG N, Scheid W. Phys. Rev. C, 2008, 78: 014607
    [20] Ghodsi O N, Gharaei R. Eur. Phys. J. A, 2012, 48: 21
    [21] Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2011, 26: 1017
    [22] Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, 2012, 21: 1250054
    [23] Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Commun. Theor. Phys., 2011, 55: 649
    [24] Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Phys. At. Nucl., 2011, 74: 49
    [25] Newton J O et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2004, 70: 024605
    [26] Hagino K, Rowley N. Phys. Rev. C, 2004, 69: 054610
    [27] Mukherjee A et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 75: 044608
    [28] Chushnyakova M V, Bhattacharya R, Gontchar I I. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 90: 017603
    [29] Gontchar I I, Bhattacharya R, Chushnyakova M V. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 89: 034601
    [30] Singh M, Duhan S S, Kharab R. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2011, 26: 2129
    [31] Sukhvinder M Singh, Kharab R. Nucl. Phys. A, 2013, 897: 179
    [32] Sukhvinder M Singh, Kharab R. Nucl. Phys. A, 2013, 897: 198
    [33] Sukhvinder M Singh, Kharab R. AIP Conf. Proc., 2013, 1524: 163
    [34] Singh M, Sukhvinder, Kharab R, Atti Della ''Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi'' Anno LXV, 2010, 6: 751
    [35] Singh M, Phil M. Dissertation (2009) (unpublished), Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra, Haryana, India
    [36] Singh M, Ph.D, Thesis, (2013) (unpublished), Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India, 2013
    [37] Singh M, Kharab R. EPJ Web of Conferences, 2014, 66: 03043
    [38] Gautam M S. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 90: 024620
    [39] Gautam M S. Nucl. Phys. A, 2015, 933: 272
    [40] Gautam M S. Phys. Scr., 2015, 90: 025301, Phys. Scr., 2015, 90: 055301
    [41] Gautam M S. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2015, 30: 1550013; Acta Phys. Pol. B, 2015, 46: 1055; Can. J. Phys., 2015, 93: 1
    [42] Tripathi V et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 65: 014614
    [43] Baby L T et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2000, 62: 014603
    [44] Sinha S et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 64: 024607
    [45] Wong C Y. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1973, 31: 766
    [46] Hagino K, Rowley N, Kruppa A T. Comput. Phys. Commun., 1999, 123: 143
    [47] Hill D L, Wheeler J A. Phys. Rev., 1953, 89: 1102
    [48] Hagino K et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1997, 55: 276
    [49] Hagino K et al. J. Phys. G, 1997, 23: 1413
    [50] Esbensen H, Fricke S H, Landowne S. Phys. Rev. C, 1989, 40: 2046
    [51] Hagino K et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1998, 57: 1349
    [52] Zamrun F M {et al.} Phys. Rev. C, 2010, 81: 044609
    [53] Anjos R M et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1990, 42: 354
    [54] Ghodsi O N, Zanganeh V. Nucl. Phys. A, 2010, 846: 40
    [55] Esbensen H, JIANG C L, Stefanini A M. Phys. Rev. C, 2010, 82: 054621
    [56] Esbensen H, JIANG C L, Stefanini A M. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 89: 044606
    [57] Esbensen H, JIANG C L. Phys. Rev. C, 2009, 79: 064619
    [58] Esbensen H, Misicu S. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 76: 054609
    [59] Stefanini A M et al. Phys. Lett. B, 2009, 679: 95
    [60] Stefanini A M et al. Phys. Lett. B, 2014, 728: 639
  • 加载中

Get Citation
Manjeet Singh Gautam. Static versus energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus} potential for description of sub-barrier fusion dynamics of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(11): 114102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/11/114102
Manjeet Singh Gautam. Static versus energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus} potential for description of sub-barrier fusion dynamics of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(11): 114102.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/11/114102 shu
Milestone
Received: 2015-03-27
Fund

    Supported by Dr. D. S. Kothari Post-Doctoral Fellowship Scheme sponsored by University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India

Article Metric

Article Views(761)
PDF Downloads(65)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Static versus energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus} potential for description of sub-barrier fusion dynamics of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions

    Corresponding author: Manjeet Singh Gautam,
  • 1. School of Physics and Material Science, Thapar University, Patiala (Punjab)-147004, India
Fund Project:  Supported by Dr. D. S. Kothari Post-Doctoral Fellowship Scheme sponsored by University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India

Abstract: The static and energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus potentials are simultaneously used along with the Wong formula for exploration of fusion dynamics of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions. The role of internal structure degrees of freedom of colliding pairs, such as inelastic surface vibrations, are examined within the context of coupled channel calculations performed using the code CCFULL. Theoretical calculations based on the static Woods-Saxon potential along with the one-dimensional Wong formula fail to address the fusion data of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions. Such discrepancies can be removed if one uses couplings to internal structure degrees of freedom of colliding nuclei. However, the energy-dependent Woods-Saxon potential model (EDWSP model) accurately describes the sub-barrier fusion enhancement of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions. Therefore, in sub-barrier fusion dynamics, energy dependence in the nucleus-nucleus potential governs barrier modification effects in a closely similar way to that of the coupled channel approach.

    HTML

Reference (60)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return