A geometric factor calculation method based on the isotropic flux assumption

ZHAO Xiao-Yun; WANG Huan-Yu; WU Feng; MENG Xiang-Cheng; MA Yu-Qian; LU Hong; WANG Hui; WANG Ping; LI Xin-Qiao; XU Yan-Bin; SHI Feng; JIANG Wen-Qi; AN Zhen-Hua; YU Xiao-Xia; LIU Han-Yi

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/37/12/126201

Chinese Physics C> 2013, Vol. 37> Issue(12) : 126201 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/12/126201

A geometric factor calculation method based on the isotropic flux assumption

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
One of the instruments onboard the China Seismic Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES) is the Low Energy Particle Detector (LEPD). The primary objective of LEPD is to provide measurements of the fluxes, energy spectra and pitch angles of 100 keV to 10 MeV electrons and protons from 2 to 50 MeV in the Earth's magnetosphere. The geometric factor is one of the principle parameters of a detector, which converts the physical quantity-count rate to the particle quantity-flux. In this paper, we calculated the geometric factor of LEPD via computer modeling of an isotropic radiation environment. It was first demonstrated that the radiation intensity related should obey a cosine-law, then a general sampling method of generating this distribution via GPS of GEANT4 was explained. Furthermore, combined with flux normalization, a comparison of the geometric factor calculation of a set of 2-layer detectors with different shapes (cylinder, truncated cone and rectangle) was performed. Results show a generally good agreement between simulation and analytical calculations for the cylinder and truncated cone detectors, and the result of the rectangular one, for which there is no accurate analytical formula, is consistent with the previous simulated results by others. As a practical instance of the 2-layer rectangle detector, the geometric factor of LEPD is 10.336±0.036 m cm²·sr for 10 MeV proton and 8.211±0.032 m cm²·sr for 8 MeV electron.

[1]	Ri-Guang Huang , You-Cai Chen , Dong-Liang Fang . 0νββ decay nuclear matrix elements under Left-Right symmetric model from the spherical quasi-particle random phase approximation method with realistic force. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-11.
[2]	Wentao Zeng , Zehao Lin , Yiran Wang , Shuangquan Zhang , Jinniu Hu , Ying Zhang . Resonant states in the Schrödinger equation solved by the Green's function method. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-10.
[3]	Li Tang , Liang Liu , Ying Wu . Null test of cosmic curvature using deep learning method. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-8.
[4]	M. Zubair , Hira Sohail , Saira Waheed , Amara Ilyas , Irfan Mahmood . Stellar Configurations in f(R, L_m, T) Gravity: Probing Anisotropy and Stability via Minimal Geometric Deformation. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-21.
[5]	Bo Lan , Qin-Ze Song , Jin-Huan Sheng , Yi Qiao , Ru-Min Wang . Study of χ_cJ (J = 0,1,2) decays to light meson pairs based on SU(3) flavor symmetry/breaking analysis. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 123106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adff00
[6]	Yu Xi , Fu-Wen Shu . Constraints on Lorentz invariance violation from GRB 221009A using the DisCan method. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 125101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adfa01
[7]	Siyuan Zhang , Qi Niu , Yichao Li , Xin Zhang . Configuration requirements for 21-cm forest background quasar searches with Moon-based interferometer. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(11): 115105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade957
[8]	Allah Ditta , Sulaman Shaukat , Faisal Javed , Abdelmalek Bouzenada , G. Mustafa , Bander Almutairi . Stable circular orbits and greybody factor of Hayward-Letelier-AdS black holes. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(11): 115104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade4a7
[9]	Qi Zeng , Bushi Huang , Tingwei Peng , Hongfu Li , Xing Xu , Yuanming Xing , Huaiqiang Zhang , Jiankun Zhao , Xu Zhou . A novel method of half-life determination for highly charged ions based on isochronous mass spectrometry. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(11): 114002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade959
[10]	LIANG Jun , LIU Yan-Chun , ZHU Qiao . Thermodynamics of noncommutative geometry inspired black holes based on Maxwell-Boltzmann smeared mass distribution. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(2): 025101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/2/025101
[11]	WANG Ji-Ke , MAO Ze-Pu , BIAN Jian-Ming , CAO Guo-Fu , CAO Xue-Xiang , CHEN Shen-Jian , DENG Zi-Yan , FU Cheng-Dong , GAO Yuan-Ning , HE Kang-Lin , HE Miao , HUA Chun-Fei , HUANG Bin , HUANG Xing-Tao , JI Xiao-Bin , LI Fei , LI Hai-Bo , LI Wei-Dong , LIANG Yu-Tie , LIU Chun-Xiu , LIU Huai-Min , LIU Suo , LIU Ying-Jie , MA Qiu-Mei , MA Xiang , MAO Ya-Jun , MO Xiao-Hu , PAN Ming-Hua , PANG Cai-Ying , PING Rong-Gang , QIN Ya-Hong , QIU Jin-Fa , SUN Sheng-Sen , SUN Yong-Zhao , WANG Liang-Liang , WEN Shuo-Pin , , , , , , . Software alignment of the BESⅢ main drift chamber using the Kalman Filter method. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(3): 210-216. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/3/010
[12]	FAN Ping , YUAN Da-Qing , ZUO Yi , ZHENG Yong-Nan , ZHOU Dong-Mei , WU Xiao-Guang , LI Guang-Sheng , ZHU Li-Hua , XU Guo-Ji , FAN Qi-Wen , ZHANG Xi-Zhen , ZHU Sheng-Yun . Proton alignment in ⁸²Sr investigated by g-factor measurements. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(S1): 206-208. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/S1/066
[13]	ZHANG Man-Zhou , HOU Jie , LI Hao-Hu , LIU Gui-Min , LI De-Ming . Optimal sorting method and application to SSRF booster dipoles. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(11): 924-927. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/32/11/015
[14]	GUO Yun-Jun , HE Kang-Lin . Muon Identification Using the Efficiencies Ratio Method at BESⅡ. Chinese Physics C, 2007, 31(11): 1050-1055.
[15]	Chen Zhongqiu , Shao Changgui , Ma Weichuan . Calculation of Wilson Loop Functionals for Classical and Quantum Gravities. Chinese Physics C, 1998, 22(3): 217-224.
[16]	CHANG KONG-LIANG . DIMENSIONAL METHOD TO SOLVE THE DIFFUSION CONVECTION EQUATION OF SOLAR COSMIC RAYS. Chinese Physics C, 1978, 2(3): 200-210.

Access

Get Citation

ZHAO Xiao-Yun, WANG Huan-Yu, WU Feng, MENG Xiang-Cheng, MA Yu-Qian, LU Hong, WANG Hui, WANG Ping, LI Xin-Qiao, XU Yan-Bin, SHI Feng, JIANG Wen-Qi, AN Zhen-Hua, YU Xiao-Xia and LIU Han-Yi. A geometric factor calculation method based on the isotropic flux assumption[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(12): 126201. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/12/126201

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2013-02-19
Revised: 2013-04-02

Article Metric

Article Views(3263)
PDF Downloads(294)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

A geometric factor calculation method based on the isotropic flux assumption

Corresponding author: ZHAO Xiao-Yun,

Corresponding author: WANG Huan-Yu,

Received Date: 2013-02-19

Accepted Date: 2013-04-02

Available Online: 2013-12-05

Abstract: One of the instruments onboard the China Seismic Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES) is the Low Energy Particle Detector (LEPD). The primary objective of LEPD is to provide measurements of the fluxes, energy spectra and pitch angles of 100 keV to 10 MeV electrons and protons from 2 to 50 MeV in the Earth's magnetosphere. The geometric factor is one of the principle parameters of a detector, which converts the physical quantity-count rate to the particle quantity-flux. In this paper, we calculated the geometric factor of LEPD via computer modeling of an isotropic radiation environment. It was first demonstrated that the radiation intensity related should obey a cosine-law, then a general sampling method of generating this distribution via GPS of GEANT4 was explained. Furthermore, combined with flux normalization, a comparison of the geometric factor calculation of a set of 2-layer detectors with different shapes (cylinder, truncated cone and rectangle) was performed. Results show a generally good agreement between simulation and analytical calculations for the cylinder and truncated cone detectors, and the result of the rectangular one, for which there is no accurate analytical formula, is consistent with the previous simulated results by others. As a practical instance of the 2-layer rectangle detector, the geometric factor of LEPD is 10.336±0.036 m cm²·sr for 10 MeV proton and 8.211±0.032 m cm²·sr for 8 MeV electron.

A geometric factor calculation method based on the isotropic flux assumption

Abstract：

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article