-
SMBHBs are the most promising sources to explain the origin of recent PTA results. It is important to note that the astrophysically motivated models of SMBHB populations are able to reproduce the observed low-frequency GW spectrum in an elegant manner [17, 19]. We adopt these astrophysically motivated models [19, 22] and inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms [23, 24] to obtain the full spectrum of SMBHBs. Then, the present-day energy density of the SGWB of SMBHBs
$ {{\Omega _{{{\rm{GW}}}}}}(f) $ is given by [25]$ {{\Omega _{{{\rm{GW}}}}}}(f) = \frac{8 \pi G f }{3 H_0^2 c^2} \int {\rm d} z {\rm d}{\cal{M}} \frac{{\rm d}^2 n}{{\rm d}z {\rm d}{\cal{M}}} \frac{{\rm d}E_{\rm GW}}{{\rm d}f_r}, $
(1) where
$ H_0 = 67.4 \ {\rm km\ sec^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}} $ [26] is the Hubble constant, and$ f_r = (1+z)f $ is the source-frame GW frequency. Here,$ \mathcal{M} = M q^{3/5} / (1 + q)^{1/5} $ is the chirp mass of the SMBHB, where M is the primary mass, and q is the mass ratio of the black hole. Moreover,${\rm d}^2n/{\rm d}z {\rm d} \mathcal{M}$ refers to the SMBHB population. The relevant ranges in the integrals are$ 0 \le z \le 5 $ and$ 10^5 M_\odot \le \mathcal{M} \le 10^{11} M_\odot $ .The SMBHB population of this model can be obtained from the galaxy population as
$ \frac{{\rm d}^3n_G}{{\rm d}z^{\prime} {\rm d}M_G {\rm d}q_G} = \frac{\Phi(M_G,z)}{M_G \ln 10} \frac{\mathcal{F}(M_G,z,q_G)}{\tau(M_G,z,q_G)} \frac{{\rm d}t_r}{{\rm d}z}, $
(2) where z denotes the redshift of the galaxy pair,
$ z^{\prime} $ is the redshift at galaxy pair merging, and they are connected by the merger timescale of the galaxy pair$ \tau(M_G,z,q_G) $ . Moreover, there is a correlation between the mass of a galaxy and the mass of the supermassive black hole (SMBH) at its center, known as the SMBH-Host relation [22, 27], which translates the galaxy mass$ M_G $ to the black hole mass M. The Bayesian inference method is employed to obtain the posterior distributions of the parameters that are yet to be determined in the model [19]. The posterior can be presented as$ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} p(\Theta\vert d) \propto \mathcal{L}(d \vert \Theta) p(\Theta), \end{array} $
(3) where
$ p(\Theta) $ are the priors on the population parameters obtained from astrophysical obervation [19, 22], and the likelihood$ \mathcal{L}(d \vert \Theta) $ is computed from the NANOGrav 15-yr free-spectrum. -
Here, we adopt the analytic-fit sensitivity curve
$ S_a(f) $ for the Michelson-style LISA data channel given by [5]:$ \begin{aligned}[b] S_a (f)=\;& \frac{10}{3L^2}\left( P_{\rm OMS}(f)+2(1+\cos^2(f/f_*))\frac{P_{\rm acc}(f)}{(2\pi f)^4 } \right) \\&\times\left( 1+\frac{6}{10} \left( \frac{f}{f_*} \right) ^2 \right), \end{aligned} $
(4) where the transfer frequency
$ f_*=19.09 $ mHz, and arm length$ L=2.5 \times 10^6 $ km. In addition to the instrument noise, the galactic confusion noise, also called the stochastic foreground, generated by unresolved galactic binaries will contribute extra noise$ S_c(f) $ to sensitivity; therefore, LISA's effective strain sensitivity curve$ S_n(f) $ becomes the sum of$ S_a(f) $ and$ S_c(f) $ [2, 4–6]. The detailed expressions for single-link metrology noise$ P_{\rm OMS}(f) $ , single test mass acceleration noise$ P_{\rm acc}(f) $ , and galactic confusion noise$ S_c(f) $ are given in [5]. Such additives of strain sensitivity indicate that we may calculate the impacts of the SGWB by summing its corresponding strain sensitivity$ S_{\rm GW}(f) $ to$ S_n(f) $ .Following the methods proposed by [4, 5], we define the noise strain sensitivity due to the SGWB as
$ S_{\rm GW}(f) = \frac{3H_0^2}{2\pi^2} \frac{ \Omega_{\mathrm{GW}}(f)}{f^3} , $
(5) which can be added to the strain sensitivity of LISA with galactic confusion noise
$ S_n(f) $ to obtain an effective strain sensitivity$ S_{\rm eff}(f) = S_n(f) + S_{\rm GW}(f) $ [2, 4–6], and then the SNR affected by the presence of the GW background can be written as$ \mathrm{SNR} = 2\left( \int {\rm d} f \frac{\vert \tilde{h}(f) \vert^2}{S_{\rm eff}(f)}\right) ^{1/2}, $
(6) where
$ \tilde{h}(f) $ is the frequency domain representation of the time-domain waveform$ h(t) $ , which encodes important information on the intrinsic parameters of the GW source.In Fig. 1, we present the effective characteristic strain
$ S_{\rm eff}(f) $ influenced by the SGWB originating from SMBHBs together with the specific GW signals of VGBs and an illustrative example of EMRIs. The effective characteristic strain, which represents the cumulative impact of all SMBHBs, is depicted as the burlywood-colored region in Fig. 1. Notably, within the frequency range below several$ 10^{-2} $ Hz, it experiences a dramatic increase, partially obscuring specific signals associated with VGBs and EMRIs. It is believed that GW signals from SMBHBs with SNRs equal to or greater than$ \mathcal{O}(100) $ (we set 100 as the criteria to be on the safe side) can be resolved and eliminated from the SGWB, as indicated in [2, 28]. Our approach involves using$ S_{\rm eff}(f) $ , which accounts for contributions from all SMBHBs, as a baseline. We iteratively eliminate the contributions from SMBHB events with SNR$ \ge 100 $ and derive a new effective characteristic strain. This iterative process continues until the effective characteristic strain reaches convergence.Figure 1. (color online) Expected effective characteristic strain
$ S_{\rm eff}(f) $ in the frequency range$ [10^{-5},1] $ Hz. The burlywood line represents the effective characteristic strain derived from the SGWB of all SMBHBs, whereas the purple line illustrates the effective characteristic strain obtained from the SGWB of SMBHBs after excluding those with SNR≥100. The shaded regions in both cases indicate the 90% credible intervals. Additionally, we depict the expected characteristic strain curves of LISA as black dashed lines. The dark cyan line corresponds to the characteristic strain produced by an illustrative EMRI signal [33], whereas the star marker represents VGB signals [34, 35].Although the vast majority of SMBHB signals in LISA's band with SNRs above 8
$ \sim $ 12 are individually resolvable [2, 3, 29], recent studies on unresolved SGWBs from compact binary mergers in the frequency band of next-generation ground-based GW observatories [30−32] suggest that the residual GW background$ \Omega_{{\rm{residual}}} $ might be still considerable after subtraction, where$ \Omega_{{\rm{residual}}} $ is the combination of the unresolved background$ \Omega_{{\rm{unres}}} $ and error background$ \Omega_{{\rm{error}}} $ due to the uncertainty in parameter estimation during the subtraction procedure. Because$ \Omega_{{\rm{residual}}}=\Omega_{{\rm{unres}}}+ \Omega_{{\rm{error}}} $ of a GW observatory depends on its SNR threshold for confusion noise elimination, the lower the SNR threshold, the lower the$ \Omega_{{\rm{unres}}} $ but higher the$ \Omega_{{\rm{error}}} $ [30]. We adopt the threshold$ {\rm{SNR}}=100 $ to reduce$ \Omega_{{\rm{error}}} $ to a negligible level, given that the error background from compact binary mergers in LISA's band still requires study.As a result, the shift in the characteristic strain, represented by the purple-colored region in Fig. 1, becomes reduced compared to that in the non-eliminated scenario. Furthermore, the frequency band influenced by the SGWB shifts from several
$ 10^{-2} $ Hz to a few$ 10^{-3} $ Hz, moving away from LISA's most sensitive range.Given that the MRs of LISA set the requirement of a minimum SNR level for specific detectable sources, we further discuss the impact of the SGWB on LISA's detection in terms of variations in the SNR in the subsequent sections.
-
Because there are large numbers of compact binaries in the Milky Way Galaxy that emit continuous and nearly monochromatic electromagnetic (EM) signals, parts of these binaries are already verified by observations other than GW detection. For VGBs emitting GW signals in LISA's frequency band, the joint EM and GW observation can be performed. Details of these VGBs in LISA's band can be found in [34, 35]. In LISA's SO1: When studying the formation and evolution of compact binary stars in the Milk Way Galaxy, the ability to detected and measure the (intrinsic and orbital) parameters of these VGBs is vital. Assuming a strain sensitivity without an effect from the SGWB, along with the estimation of the population of VGBs given in [39], LISA should be able to detect and resolve
$ \sim 25000 $ VGBs.We utilize data from VGBs obtained from Gaia DR3 [34]. Following the procedures outlined in [40], the characteristic strain of the GW signal emanating from VGBs, as illustrated in Fig. 1, is described by
$ \begin{eqnarray} h_c = \sqrt{T_{\rm obs}} \frac{2 (G \mathcal{M})^{5/3}}{c^4 d} \pi^{2/3} f^{7/6} . \end{eqnarray} $
(7) Here,
$ \mathcal{M} $ represents the chirp mass of each individual VGB, d signifies the distance to the source, and f corresponds to the GW frequency, which is twice the orbital frequency. For the sake of simplicity, the VGBs can be characterized as monochromatic GW signals with a set of parameters obtained from Gaia DR3. It is important to note that the SNR of VGBs can be readily calculated by taking the ratio of the characteristic strain$ h_c $ to the effective characteristic strain of the detector$ S_{\text{eff}}(f) $ .The EMRI is the inspiral of a stellar-mass compact object, such as a stellar-mass black hole, neutron star, or white drawf, into an SMBH. Here, we adopt the numerical kludge method [33, 41] to calculate the time-domain waveform of EMRIs. Because the inspiral signal of EMRIs can remain in LISA's frequency band for months to many years, and the binary might spend up to
$ 10^5 $ or more orbits near the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO), the events of the EMRI can provide accurate information on the space-time around the SMBH. This information can provide accurate measurements of the mass and spin of the SMBH and allow us to test Kerr geometry at a new high level. In SO3, the dynamics of dense nuclear clusters are probed using EMRIs, and in SO5, the fundamental nature of gravity and black holes is explored; therefore, the detection of EMRIs in the LISA frequency band can open a new channel of astrophysics discovery. Meanwhile, in SO6, the rate of expansion of the Universe is probed, and LISA will probe the topics in cosmology via EMRIs.Because of the large uncertainty in the astrophysics of EMRIs, the LISA sensitivity without effects from the SGWB would result in a minimum rate of one case per year according to conservative EMRI population models [42]. For convenience of presentation, we only take one example of EMRI in Fig. 1.
According to the SNR shift caused by the presence of the SGWB within LISA noise, as depicted in Fig. 3, it is evident that the SNRs of VGBs subjected to unabated
$ S_{\rm eff}(f) $ will experience a dramatic reduction. In fact, some of them drop below the threshold level of$ {\rm{SNR}}=8 $ , rendering them undetectable by LISA. However, the detection of an SGWB originating from SMBHBs with$ {\rm{SNR}} \geq 100 $ holds the potential to significantly alleviate these SNR shifts for the majority of obscured VGBs, as illustrated in Fig. 3.Figure 3. (color online) SNR for VGB systems and an EMRI example. The threshold corresponds to an SNR of 8, signifying the minimum requirement for detecting these compact binary signals. The orange dots represent the SNR for LISA at its original sensitivity level, whereas the burlywood error bars illustrate the SNR for LISA sensitivity influenced by the SGWB generated by all SMBHBs. The purple error bar points indicate the SNR for LISA's sensitivity affected by the SGWB from SMBHBs with SNR values <100. For detailed information regarding the names and parameters of VGBs, refer to [34, 35], and for the parameters of the illustrative EMRI signal, refer to Fig. 1.
Impacts of gravitational-wave background from supermassive black hole binaries on the detection of compact binaries by LISA
- Received Date: 2024-02-21
- Available Online: 2024-06-15
Abstract: In the frequency band of the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), extensive research has been conducted on the impact of foreground confusion noise generated by galactic binaries within the Milky Way Galaxy. Additionally, recent evidence of a stochastic signal, announced by the NANOGrav, EPTA, PPTA, CPTA, and InPTA, indicates that the stochastic gravitational-wave background (SGWB) generated by supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs) can contribute strong background noise within the LISA band. Given the presence of such strong noise, it is expected to have significant impacts on LISA's scientific missions. In this study, we investigate the impacts of the SGWB generated by SMBHBs on the detection of individual massive black hole binaries, verified galactic binaries, and extreme mass ratio inspirals in the context of LISA. We find it essential to resolve and eliminate the excess noise from the SGWB to guarantee the success of LISA's missions.