-
The identification of nuclei produced in the present experiment was performed by searching for energy-position-time correlated α-decay chains with the help of the known α-decay properties of their descendants. Figure 1 shows the energy spectrum of all particles observed in the DSSD and vetoed with the MWPCs and veto detectors. All peaks with high statistics can be identified by the energy and half-life of their α particles. The Ac and Ra isotopes were produced from charged-particle evaporation channels. The α-decay properties of these isotopes observed in this study are listed in Table 1, which are compared with literature values. It is noted that these data agree well with the known decay properties.
Figure 1. Energy spectrum of all particles measured in the DSSD and vetoed with the MWPCs and veto detectors in the
$ ^{55} $ Mn +$ ^{159} $ Tb reaction at 257 MeV.A two-dimensional scatter plot for the correlation between the parent and daughter α-particle energies is shown in Fig. 2. The searching time windows were 0.19 s for the ER - α
$ _{1} $ pair and 6 s for the α$ _{1} $ - α$ _{2} $ pair. The α-decay correlations originating from the Th, Ac, and Ra isotopes were clearly identified based on their known decay properties. In the parent α-particle energy range of 7.7 to 8.0 MeV, the isotopes$ ^{210,211} $ Th produced in the 4-5n evaporation channels were clearly identified. In the time windows of$ \triangle t$ (ER - α$ _{1} $ )$ \leq $ 80 ms and$ \triangle t$ (α$ _{1} $ - α$ _{2} $ )$ \leq $ 1.2 s, the α decays of$ ^{210} $ Th were screened out. In total, 38 decay chains were assigned to$ ^{210} $ Th, of which there were 19 ER - α$ _{1} $ - α$ _{2} $ correlated chains, seven chains with α$ _{2} $ escaping, and 12 chains with α$ _{1} $ escaping. The signals of the escaping α events under consideration were successfully detected by both the DSSD and SSDs. Figure 3 shows the distributions of α-particle energies and decay times of$ ^{210} $ Th and its daughter nucleus$ ^{206} $ Ra. The α-particle energy and half-life of$ ^{210} $ Th were determined to be 7922(14) keV and 14(4) ms, respectively, which are consistent with the values of$ E_{\alpha} $ = 7917(6) keV and$ T_{1/2} $ = 16.0(36) ms reported in a previous study [15]. The daughter nuclei with an α-particle energy of 7269(14) keV and a half-life of 0.23(4) s were identified. The properties are in accordance with data from Ref. [16]. It should be noted that the energies of the reconstructed events were not used in the determination of the α-decay energy of$ ^{210} $ Th owing to the poor energy resolution, whereas their lifetimes were used to determine the half-life.Figure 2. Two-dimensional scatter plot of the parent and daughter α-particle energies of the ER-α
$ _{1} $ -α$ _{2} $ type measured in the DSSD. The searching time windows were 0.19 s for the ER-α$ _{1} $ pair and 6 s for the α$ _{1} $ -α$ _{2} $ pair.Figure 3. (color online) α-particle energies (left panel) and decay time distributions (right panel) for
$ ^{210} $ Th and its daughter nucleus$ ^{206} $ Ra measured in this study. The α-particle energy is derived by considering only the full-energy α particles. The half-lives in the right panel are determined using the method described in Ref. [14].With an incident energy of 257 MeV, a total of twelve decay chains, six of which were ER - α
$ _{1} $ - α$ _{2} $ , were assigned to the isotope$ ^{211} $ Th. The α-decay energy and half-life of the parent nuclide were 7788(14) keV and 36$ ^{+15}_{-8} $ ms, respectively, and the decay properties of the corresponding daughter nuclide were 7130(14) keV and 1.3$ ^{+0.5}_{-0.3} $ s, respectively. These data are consistent with the known decay properties of$ ^{211} $ Th [17] ($ E_{\alpha} $ = 7792(14) keV,$ T_{1/2} $ = 37$ ^{+28}_{-11} $ ms) and$ ^{207} $ Ra [16] ($ E_{\alpha} $ = 7133(5) keV,$ T_{1/2} $ = 1.3(2) s).The production cross sections of 0.59
$ ^{+0.25}_{-0.23} $ nb and 0.19$ ^{+0.12}_{-0.09} $ nb were determined for$ ^{210} $ Th and$ ^{211} $ Th, respectively. A transmission efficiency of 50% for the gas-filled recoil separator SHANS2 was used in the calculation. Figure 4 presents the calculation of the excitation function using the HIVAP code in comparison with the cross sections measured in this study, and the corresponding results are also listed in Table 1. The value of the scaling factor C$ _{f} $ for the fission barrier was determined by comparing the cross section generated by the$ ^{64} $ Ni +$ ^{150} $ Sm reaction [15]. It is shown that the HIVAP calculation fits well with the measured cross sections within a factor of three (except for$ ^{211} $ Th).Figure 4. (color online) Excitation function of the evaporation channels of the
$ ^{55} $ Mn+$ ^{159} $ Tb reaction calculated with the HIVAP code, where the fission barrier scaling factor C$ _{f} $ = 0.66 was used. The cross sections of$ ^{210} $ Th (green square),$ ^{211} $ Th (red circle),$ ^{210,211} $ Ac (grey triangle),$ ^{209,210} $ Ra (blue pentagon), and$ ^{207,208} $ Ra (orange diamond) were measured in this study. ''$V_{\rm Bass}$ " (black arrow) in the figure signifies the Coulomb barrier given by the Bass potential [18] of the$ ^{55} $ Mn+$ ^{159} $ Tb reaction. In practice, it was calculated by the program LISE++ [19].Isotopes This study $\sigma_{\rm hivap}$ /nbLiterature data $ E_{\alpha} $ /keV$ T_{1/2} $ σ/nb $ E_{\alpha} $ /keV$ T_{1/2} $ Ref. $ ^{210,211} $ Ac7463(14) 0.338(6) s 97(26) 71 7462(8), 7477(6) 0.35(5) s, 0.21(3) s [16] $ ^{207\rm m} $ Ra7323(14) 59.0(35) ms — — 7323(8) 59(4) ms [16] $ ^{207,208} $ Ra7132(14) 1.28(2) s 126(34) 77 7131(4), 7133(5) 1.2(1) s, 1.3(2) s [16] $ ^{209,210} $ Ra7014(14) 2.74(6) s 53(14) 30 7006(3), 7016(4) 4.8(2) s, 3.7(2) s [16] $ ^{210} $ Th7922(14) 14(4) ms 0.59 $ ^{+0.25}_{-0.23} $ 1.5 7917(6) 16.0(36) ms [15] $ ^{211} $ Th7788(14) 36 $ ^{+15}_{-8} $ ms0.19 $ ^{+0.12}_{-0.09} $ 1.3 7792(14) 37 $ ^{+28}_{-11} $ ms[17] Table 1. α-decay properties of the Ac, Ra, and Th isotopes produced in the
$ ^{55} $ Mn +$ ^{159} $ Tb reaction. The second and third columns are the α-particle energies and half-lives of these isotopes measured in this study. The fourth column shows the reaction cross sections for the corresponding isotopes. The fifth column ($\sigma_{\rm hivap}$ ) shows the cross sections calculated by the HIVAP code. The corresponding literature values are shown in columns six and seven.The fusion evaporation products that recoiled from the target had a wide distribution of the charge state. In the separator filled with dilute gas, ERs and gas molecules continuously collide while exchanging charges, and then the charge state of the ERs fluctuates around an equilibrium value. Calculating the equilibrium charge state of the ions is crucial when determining the optimum magnetic rigidity for the products of interest. Therefore, it is essential for the study of superheavy elements with low reaction cross sections. In the experiment, to obtain the equilibrium charge state of the ERs, the actual magnetic rigidity of the ERs was first determined. Figure 5(a) shows the position distribution of
$ ^{210} $ Th in the DSSD with helium gas at 80 Pa, where the horizontal shift in the center of the position distribution toward the center of the DSSD was –25 mm. The minus sign indicates the inner radius side of the DSSD, with its center as the origin. Based on Ref. [11], the actual momentum dispersion of SHANS2 was determined as 21.1 mm. Therefore, the actual magnetic rigidity was determined as 1.569 T$ \cdot $ m, based on Ref. [20]. Figures 5(b) and 5(c) show the energy distribution of$ ^{210} $ Th and that calculated under the same conditions, respectively. The calculated energy distribution was obtained using the method described in Ref. [21], which considers multiple scattering and energy loss. According to Figs. 5(b) and 5(c), the simulation is in good agreement with the experimental results. This fact allows for the use of the simulation program to calculate the velocity distribution of ERs at the center of the first dipole magnet$ D_{1} $ . With the above efforts, the equilibrium charge state of$ ^{210} $ Th was determined as 10.45 e, which was corrected by a sinusoidal term taken from Ref. [21]. The corrected results are plotted as a function of ($ v/v_{0})Z^{1/3} $ in Fig. 6. The data for the isotopes of Fr, Ac, and Th in the figure are taken from literature [11].Figure 5. Position (a) and energy (b) distribution of
$ ^{210} $ Th detected by the DSSD in the experiment, and the calculated energy distribution (c) in the DSSD obtained from the simulation.Figure 6. (color online) corrected equilibrium charge states plotted as a function of (
$ v/v_{0})Z^{1/3} $ , including the corrected one of$ ^{210} $ Th (red hexagon) and the estimated ($ v/v_{0})Z^{1/3} $ of the elements 119 (red arrow) and 120 (black arrow). The other data are taken from Ref. [11], and the blue line represents the calculation based on the empirical formula from Ref. [21].The estimated (
$ v/v_{0})Z^{1/3} $ values of the elements 119 and 120 produced in the 3n channel of the$ ^{55} $ Mn +$ ^{240} $ Pu [22] and$ ^{55} $ Mn +$ ^{243} $ Am [23] reactions, respectively, are also plotted in Fig. 6. In the calculation, the maximum of the excitation function was determined according to Refs. [22, 23]. With the corresponding incident energy of projectiles, the energy distributions of the$ ^{292} $ 119 and$ ^{295} $ 120 nuclei at the center of D$ _{1} $ were obtained through the simulation, leading to the determination of the ($ v/v_{0})Z^{1/3} $ values for the two nuclei. These values ($Q_{\rm eq}$ -sinusoidal correction) could be estimated from the blue line in Fig. 6. The related parameters for calculating the equilibrium charge state of elements 119 and 120 are presented in Table 2. Owing to the lack of experimental data on ($ v/v_{0})Z^{1/3} $ of 13 to 14, there was an uncertainty in the value of the equilibrium charge states. Therefore, relevant studies must be conducted in the future.Reaction (channel) $ E^{*} $ /MeV$E_{\rm lab}$ /MeV$E_{\rm ER}$ /MeV( $ v/v_{0})Z^{1/3} $ $Q_{\rm eq}$ /e$ ^{55} $ Mn +$ ^{240} $ Pu (3n)38 327.4 54.9 13.52 8.43 $ ^{55} $ Mn +$ ^{243} $ Am (3n)41 332.2 55.1 13.51 8.42 Table 2. Calculated equilibrium charge states of the elements 119 and 120, along with other related parameters.
Reaction 55Mn + 159Tb : preparation for the synthesis of new elements
- Received Date: 2022-12-02
- Available Online: 2023-05-15
Abstract: The complete fusion reaction of