-
Within the pQCD improved parton model at NLO [13], the inclusive cross section of single hadron production in p+p collisions is determined by two factors: the initial hard parton-jet spectrum
$ F_{q,g}(p_{\rm{T}}/z_h) $ and the parton FFs to final-state hadrons in vacuum,$ D_{q,g\to h}(z_{h}, Q^2) $ .$ \begin{aligned}[b] \frac{1}{p_{\rm{T}}}\frac{{\rm d}\sigma_{h}}{{\rm d}p_{\rm{T}}}=&\int F_{q}\left(\frac{p_{\rm{T}}}{z_{h}}\right)\cdot D_{q\to h}(z_{h}, Q^2)\frac{{\rm d}z_{h}}{z_{h}^2} \\ & + \int F_{g}\left(\frac{p_{\rm{T}}}{z_{h}}\right)\cdot D_{g\to h}(z_{h}, Q^2)\frac{{\rm d}z_{h}}{z_{h}^2} \,\,\, . \end{aligned} $
(1) where
$ F_{q,g}(p_{\rm{T}}/z_h) $ is the convolution of initial parton distribution functions (PDFs) and partonic scattering cross sections, in which$ z_h $ is the momentum fraction carried by the final hadron of its parent parton at the fragmentation scale Q. In this study, the factorization, renormalization, and fragmentation scales are taken to be equal and proportional to the final-state$ p_{\rm{T}} $ of the leading hadron. CT14 parametrization [39] is employed for proton PDFs. KKP FFs [33] are utilized for both$ \pi^0 $ and charged hadron production, AESSS FFs [35] are used for η mesons, and NLO Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi (DGLAP) evolved FFs parametrized at the initial energy scale$ Q_0^2=1.5 $ GeV$ ^2 $ by a broken SU(3) model are used for ϕ mesons [29–31].Note that KKP parametrizations are chosen because, during our calculations, we find that the NLO theoretical results of
$ \pi^0 $ production using the AKK08 [32], KKP [33], or KRE [34] FFs cannot simultaneously describe the experimental data from relatively low collision energies, such as 200 GeV, at the RHIC to very high collisions energies, such as 13 TeV, at the LHC. This predicament is also pointed out in Refs. [36–38], and the same occurs in the charged hadron and η calculations. However, when we focus on LHC energies, KKP parametrizations can effectively describe the experimental data for charged hadron production. KKP parametrizations are also able to describe$ \pi^0 $ production at all collision energies within a margin of error with a re-scale factor K. The same method is applied to AESSS parametrizations in η FFs to provide decent p+p baselines at all collision energies with a K factor.In Fig. 1, we present the numerical results of the final-state yields of charged hadrons,
$ \pi^0,\ \eta $ , and ϕ at 2.76 TeV to 13 TeV and their comparison with all available experimental data [27, 41–50]. For charged hadron production, our calculation results agree well with experimental data [27, 45, 46] at all available energies in the margin of error when we fix the scales at$ \mu = \mu_f = \mu_r = 1.0\ p_{\rm{T}} $ . For the$ \pi^0 $ yields [41–44], we utilize KKP parametrizations of FFs in vacuum with$ K_{\pi^0}=0.5 $ and scales of$ \mu = 1.0\ p_{\rm{T}} $ . For the η yields [41–44], AESSS FFs with the rescale factor$ K_{\eta}=0.6 $ are utilized when fixing$ \mu = 1.0\ p_{\rm{T}} $ . ϕ production with$ \mu = 1.0\ p_{\rm{T}} $ also gives a decent description of the ALICE measurements [47–50] as the collision energy reaches$ 13 $ TeV. -
To facilitate the parton energy loss mechanism of final-state hadron production in HIC, we factorize the process into two steps. A fast parton first loses energy owing to multiple scatterings with other partons in the hot and dense medium. It then fragments into final-state hadrons in vacuum. The total energy loss is carried away by radiated gluons and embodied in medium-modified quark FFs with the higher-twist approach [6–11],
$ \begin{aligned}[b] \tilde{D}_{q}^{h}(z_h,Q^2) =& D_{q}^{h}(z_h,Q^2)+\frac{\alpha_s(Q^2)}{2\pi} \int_0^{Q^2}\frac{{\rm d}\ell_T^2}{\ell_T^2} \\ &\times \int_{z_h}^{1}\frac{{\rm d}z}{z} \left[ \Delta\gamma_{q\rightarrow qg}(z,x,x_L,\ell_T^2)D_{q}^h\left(\frac{z_h}{z},Q^2\right)\right. \\ &+ \left. \Delta\gamma_{q\rightarrow gq}(z,x,x_L,\ell_T^2)D_{g}^h\left(\frac{z_h}{z},Q^2\right) \right] . \end{aligned} $
(2) where
$ \ell_T $ is the transverse momentum of the radiated gluons. Gluon radiation is then induced by the scattering of the quark with another gluon carrying a finite momentum fraction x.$ x_L $ denotes the longitudinal momentum fraction, z is the momentum fraction carried by the final quark, and$ \Delta\gamma_{q\rightarrow qg}(z,x,x_L,\ell_T^2) $ and$ \Delta\gamma_{q\rightarrow gq} (z,x,x_L,\ell_T^2) = \Delta\gamma_{q\rightarrow qg}(1-z,x,x_L,\ell_T^2) $ are the medium modified splitting functions [6, 7, 10, 11] which depend on the twist-four quark-gluon correlations inside the medium$ T_{qg}^{A}(x,x_L) $ ,$ \begin{aligned}[b]&\Delta\gamma_{q\rightarrow qg}(z,x,x_L,\ell_T^2) \\=&\Bigg[\frac{1+z^2}{(1-z)_+}T_{qg}^{A}(x,x_L) +\delta(1-z) \\& \times\ \Delta T_{qg}^{A}(x,x_L)\Bigg] \frac{2\pi\alpha_sC_A}{\ell_T^2N_cf_q^A(x)}; \end{aligned} $
(3) $ \Delta\gamma_{q\rightarrow gq}(z,x,x_L,\ell_T^2)=\Delta\gamma_{q\rightarrow qg}(1-z,x,x_L,\ell_T^2). \, $
(4) where
$ \alpha_s $ is the strong coupling constant,$ f_q^A(x) $ is the initial hard parton-jet spectrum, and$ \begin{aligned}[b] \frac{T^{A}_{qg}(x,x_L)}{f_q^A(x)} =&\frac{N_{c}^{2}-1}{4\pi\alpha_sC_{R}}\frac{1+z}{2} \int {\rm d}y^- 2 \sin^{2}\left[\frac{y^-\ell_{T}^{2}}{4Ez(1-z)}\right] \\ & \times\left[\hat{q}_R(E,x_L,y)+c(x,x_{L}) \hat{q}_R(E,0,y)\right]. \, \end{aligned} $
(5) is proportional to jet transport parameter
$ \hat{q}_R(E,y) $ when assuming$ x \gg x_L,\,x_T $ [6–12]. The medium-modified FFs are averaged over the initial production position and jet propagation direction as follows [8, 9] :$ \begin{aligned}[b] \langle \tilde D_{a}^{h}(z_h,Q^2,E,b) \rangle = \frac{1}{\int {\rm d}^2{r}t_{A}(|\vec{r}|)t_{B}(|\vec{b}-\vec{r}|)} \end{aligned} $
$ \begin{aligned}[b] &\times \int\frac{{\rm d}\phi}{2\pi}d^2{r} t_{A}(|\vec{r}|)t_{B}(|\vec{b}-\vec{r}|)\\&\times\tilde{D}_{a}^{h}(z_h,Q^2,E,r,\phi,b). \end{aligned} $
(6) where the impact parameter b and nuclear thickness function
$ t_{A,B} $ are provided by the Glauber Model [54]. Then, we assume the total energy loss is the energy carried away by the radiated gluon.$ \begin{aligned}[b] \frac{\Delta E}{E} =& \frac{2N_{c}\alpha_s}{\pi} \int {\rm d}y^-{\rm d}z {{\rm d}\ell_T^2} \frac{1+z^2}{\ell_T^4} \\ & \times \left(1-\frac{1-z}{2}\right)\hat q(E,y) \sin^2\left[\frac{y^-\ell_T^2}{4Ez(1-z)}\right], \end{aligned} $
(7) which is also proportional to the jet transport parameter
$ \hat{q}_R(E,y) $ . The jet transport parameter$ \hat{q}_R(E,y) $ depends on the space-time evolution of the QCD medium, and in our study, it is described by a (3+1)D viscous hydrodynamic model CLVisc [51–53]. To take the initial-state cold nuclear matter effects into consideration, EPPS16 NLO nuclear PDFs (nPDFs) [40] are employed. Therefore, leading hadron production in A+A collisions at NLO can be obtained in a similar way as in p+p collisions so that NLO partonic cross sections are convoluted with NLO nuclear PDFs and are then convoluted with the effective medium-modified fragmentaion functions$ \tilde{D}_{q}^{h}(z_h,Q^2) $ .The nuclear modification factor
$R_{{AA}}$ for single hadron production is defined as the ratio of cross sections in A+A collisions over that in p+p collisions scaled by the averaged number of binary N+N collisions at a certain impact parameter b,$ R^b_{AB}(p_{\rm{T}}, y)=\frac{{\rm d}\sigma_{AB}^h/{\rm d}y{\rm d}p_{\rm{T}}}{\langle N_{\rm bin}^{{AB}}(b) \rangle {\rm d}\sigma_{pp}^h/{\rm d}y{\rm d}p_{\rm{T}}} \ . $
(8) where
$\langle N_{\rm bin}^{AB}(b) \rangle$ is calculated using the optical Glauber method with a deformed Fermi distribution [54, 55],$ \begin{eqnarray} &&R=1.1A^{1/3}-0.656A^{-1/3}\ \rm{fm}, \end{eqnarray} $
(9) $ \begin{eqnarray} &&\rho_A(r,\theta)=\frac{\rho_0}{1+\exp(r-R_A(\theta))/a}, \end{eqnarray} $
(10) $ \begin{eqnarray} &&R_A(\theta)=R[1+\beta_2Y_{20}(\theta)+\beta_4Y_{40}(\theta)] \end{eqnarray} $
(11) in which for
$ ^{129} $ Xe, A = 129, a = 0.68 fm,$ \beta_2 $ = 0.162, and$ \beta_4 $ = -0.003, and$ Y_{20} $ and$ Y_{40} $ are spherical harmonics [54]. The theoretical results of$R_{{AA}}$ for$ \eta,\ \rho^0,\ \phi,\ \omega,\ K^0_{\rm{S}} $ production in central Pb + Pb collisions at$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV are in good agreement with experimental data [14–17].In the upper panel of Fig. 2, the nuclear modification factor
$R_{{AA}}$ of charged hadrons as a function of$ p_{\rm{T}} $ in the most central (0%–5%) Xe+Xe collisions at$ \sqrt{s_{{NN}}} $ = 5.44 TeV is plotted with$ \hat{q}_0 = 0.7 - 1.5 \rm\; GeV^2/fm $ , which is extracted from the$ \chi^2/{\rm{d.o.f}} $ fit in the bottom panel. The theoretical plots of$ \hat{q}_0 = 1.0 \rm\; GeV^2/fm $ effectively describe both CMS [27] and ALICE [28] data. The bottom panel of Fig. 2 shows the$ \chi^2/{\rm{d.o.f}} $ fit of charged hadrons$R_{AA}$ to compare the theoretical results at various values of$ \hat{q}_0 $ with both CMS [27] and ALICE [28] data in Xe+Xe collisions at$\sqrt{s_{{NN}}}$ = 5.44 TeV, and the best value of the jet transport coefficient is$ \hat{q}_0 = 1.0 \rm\; GeV^2/fm $ . Within the uncertainty of$ \hat{q}_0 = 0.7 - 1.5 \rm\; GeV^2/fm $ , the theoretical results exhibit a relatively small deviation from experimental data and are thus considered to be in a reasonable range. It is noted that this$ \chi^2 $ fit is performed at a fixed scale, μ = 1.0$ p_{\rm{T}} $ , and theoretical uncertainties in nPDFs and FFs as well as from scale variations are not considered. Systematic and statistical uncertainties provided by the LHC are treated equally in our calculations.Figure 2. (color online) Upper: Nuclear modification factor
$R_{{AA}}$ of charged hadrons as a function of$ p_{\rm{T}} $ compared with both CMS [27] (blue stars) and ALICE [28] (green dots) data in 0%–5% Xe+Xe collisions at$\sqrt{s_{{NN}}}$ = 5.44 TeV. The best value of$ \hat{q}_0 = 1.0 \rm\; GeV^2/fm $ is shown by the red solid line. Bottom:$ \chi^2/{\rm{d.o.f}} $ calculations between theoretical results and both CMS [27] and ALICE [28] data of$R_{{AA}}$ for charged hadrons in Xe+Xe collisions at$\sqrt{s_{{NN}}}=5.44$ TeV.Now, we predict the
$R_{ {AA}}$ of$ \pi^0 $ (upper), η (middle), and ϕ (bottom) as a function of$ p_{\rm{T}} $ in Xe+Xe collisions at$\sqrt{s_{{NN}}}$ = 5.44 TeV with$ \hat{q}_0 = 0.7 - 1.5 \rm\; GeV^2/fm $ . The results are given in Fig. 3. The trends in the$ p_{\rm{T}} $ dependence of different final-state hadron species are similar, and we can naturally predict the particle ratios in Xe+Xe collisions. In Fig. 4, the particle yield ratios$ \eta/\pi^0 $ (up) and$ \phi/\pi^0 $ (down) as functions of$ p_{\rm{T}} $ in Xe+Xe collisions at$\sqrt{s_{{NN}}}$ = 5.44 TeV with the p+p reference (red solid line) are demonstrated. In the upper panel, the$ \eta/\pi^0 $ ratios in p+p collisions are almost independent of$ p_{\rm{T}} $ and remain constant at$ \sim $ 0.5, which is exactly the case at 200 GeV and 2.76 TeV calculated in our previous study [14].Figure 3. (color online) Nuclear modification factor
$ R_{\rm{AA}} $ of$ \pi^0 $ (upper), η (middle), and ϕ (bottom) as a function of$ p_{\rm{T}} $ in 0%–5% Xe+Xe collisions at$\sqrt{s_{{NN}}}$ = 5.44 TeV.$ \hat{q}_0 = 1.0 \rm\; GeV^2/fm $ is represented by the red solid line.Figure 4. (color online) Particle yield ratios
$ \eta/\pi^0 $ (up) and$ \phi/\pi^0 $ (down) in 0%–5% Xe+Xe collisions at$\sqrt{s_{{NN}}}$ = 5.44 TeV with p+p reference (red solid line).The particle ratios
$ \eta/\pi^0 $ (up) and$ \phi/\pi^0 $ (down) as functions of$ p_{\rm{T}} $ in Pb+Pb collisions at$\sqrt{s_{{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV are plotted in Fig. 5 as a supplement. We find that$ \eta/\pi^0 $ in A+A collisions coincides with that in p+p collisions at larger$ p_{\rm{T}} $ , reaching a constant of 0.5 in Au+Au 200 GeV, Pb+Pb 2.76 TeV, Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, and Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV collisions. This ratio is not affected by different choices of$ \hat{q}_0 $ at higher$ p_{\rm{T}} $ . This is the result of the η and$ \pi^0 $ yields being dominated by quark fragmentation contributions at large$ p_{\rm{T}} $ in p+p collisions. The jet quenching effect will enhance the quark contribution fraction so that the ratio in A+A collisions remains the same as that in p+p collisions, which can be described by the ratio of the corresponding FFs in vacuum [14].Figure 5. (color online) Particle yield ratios
$ \eta/\pi^0 $ (up) and$ \phi/\pi^0 $ (down) in 0%–5% Pb+Pb collisions at$\sqrt{s_{{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV with p+p reference (red solid line).In the bottom panel of Fig. 4 and Fig. 5, the
$ \phi/\pi^0 $ ratio in p+p collisions is approximately constant at$ \sim $ 0.1 as the final-state$ p_{\rm{T}} $ increases. However, in A+A collisions, the ratio$ \phi/\pi^0 $ slightly decreases with increasing$ p_{\rm{T}} $ , and the curves for A+A collisions are lower than those for p+p collisions. By comprehensively comparing the modifications of$ \phi/\pi^0 $ induced by the hot and dense medium created at different collision energies from relatively lower collision energies of 200 GeV in Au+Au collisions at the RHIC and 2.76 TeV in Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC [16] to higher energies of 5.02 TeV in Pb+Pb collisions and 5.44 TeV in Xe+Xe collisions, the deviation between the two curves in p+p and A+A collisions is found to decrease with increasing collision energy in the intermediate and larger region of$ p_{\rm{T}} $ . The mechanism behind these deviations is as follows: ϕ production at large$ p_{\rm{T}} $ is dominated by the gluon fragmentation contribution, whereas$ \pi^0 $ production is dominated by quarks in p+p collisions. The energy loss effect will depress the gluon contribution fraction and enhance the quark fraction owing to the larger energy loss of gluons than quarks [16]. -
Path-length dependence is a fundamental characteristic of the jet quenching theory, which describes how the energy loss depends on the length of a parton traversing the QCD medium. In October 2017,
$ ^{129} $ Xe+$ ^{129} $ Xe collisions at$\sqrt{s_{{NN}}}$ = 5.44 TeV were measured by the LHC in addition to$ ^{208} $ Pb +$ ^{208} $ Pb collisions. At comparable collision energies (5.02 and 5.44 TeV), the system size was the main difference between Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe collisions. It is interesting to directly compare the medium modifications of inclusive hadron production in Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV and in Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV systems. Because the p+p reference of the nuclear modification factors in both systems can be assumed to be approximately equal, a scaled ratio between the final-state hadron spectra in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions is proposed [27].$ \begin{eqnarray} R^{\rm{Xe}}_{\rm{Pb}}(p_{\rm{T}})=\frac{{\rm d}N^{\rm{XeXe}}/{\rm d}p_{\rm{T}}}{{\rm d}N^{\rm{PbPb}}/{\rm d}p_{\rm{T}}}\frac{T_{\rm{PbPb}}}{T_{\rm{XeXe}}} \,\, . \end{eqnarray} $
(12) where
${\rm d}N^{\rm{PbPb,XeXe}}/{\rm d}p_{\rm{T}}$ are the final-state hadron yields in Pb+Pb (Xe+Xe) collisions, which are scaled by the nuclear overlap function$T_{\rm{PbPb, XeXe}} = \langle N_{\rm coll}\rangle/\sigma^{pp}$ obtained through the Glauber Model. The total cross sections are$ \sigma^{pp}_{5.44} = (68.4 \pm 0.5) $ mb and$ \sigma^{pp}_{5.02} = (67.6 \pm 0.6) $ mb. The radii of the$ ^{207} $ Pb and$ ^{129} $ Xe nuclei are$ \approx $ 6.62 and 5.36 fm, respectively [54]. With comparable collision energies (5.02 TeV and 5.44 TeV) and initial temperatures (502 MeV and 484 MeV, estimated by the (3+1)D viscous hydrodynamic model CLVisc), this observable has been proven by the CMS [27] to be able to experimentally expose the system size (path length) dependence of the jet quenching effect in hadron production in A+A collisions. We can see from Eq. (12) that to calculate$ R^{\rm{Xe}}_{\rm{Pb}}(p_{\rm{T}}) $ , final-state leading hadron spectra in Pb+Pb collisions at$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV are required.In Fig. 6, we plot
$R_{{AA}}$ distributions as a function of final-state$ p_{\rm{T}} $ for charged hadrons,$ \pi^0 $ , η, and ϕ in Pb+Pb collisions at$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV compared with LHC data [42, 46, 48, 56]. In the upper left plots, we present the case of charged hadrons; the theoretical plots within the uncertainty of$ \hat{q}_0 = 1.2 - 2.0 \rm\; GeV^2/fm $ can describe both ALICE [56] and CMS [46] data well, with a best value of$ \hat{q}_0 = 1.5 \rm\; GeV^2/fm $ . The same theoretical uncertainty in$ \hat{q}_0 $ is utilized to describe the$R_{{AA}}$ distributions of$ \pi^0,\ \eta $ , and ϕ in the other plots of Fig. 6, where we find that the results of$ \pi^0 $ and ϕ can describe ALICE data [42, 48]. This value is higher than$ \hat{q}_0 = 1.0 \rm\; GeV^2/fm $ in Xe+Xe collisions at$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.44 TeV, corresponding$ \hat{q}/T^3 $ range with an initial temperature$ T_0 $ = 502 MeV at initial time$ \tau_0 = 0.6 $ fm/c, and the central position is 1.6$ \sim $ 2.8 in Pb+Pb collisions at$\sqrt{s_{{NN}}}=5.02$ TeV. This value in Xe+Xe collisions at$\sqrt{s_{{NN}}}=5.44$ TeV is 1.8$ \sim $ 2.6 with an initial temperature$ T_0 $ = 484 MeV. We note that the JET Collaboration found that$ \hat q/T^3 $ has a dependence on the medium temperature T [21], and the baryon chemical potential$ \mu_B $ dependence of$ \hat{q} $ as well as jet properties such as the momentum of jet partons, mass, flavor, and the strong coupling constant is investigated in Refs. [25, 26]. Therefore, at different collision energies, initial temperatures, and nucleus radii, the extracted best value of$ \hat{q}_0 $ is expected to differ. More experimental data will help us better constrain such an extraction, especially in Xe+Xe collisions.Figure 6. (color online) Nuclear modification factor
$R_{{AA}}$ of charged hadrons (upper left),$ \pi^0 $ (upper right), η (bottom left), and ϕ (bottom right) as a function of$ p_{\rm{T}} $ in 0%–5% Pb+Pb collisions at$\sqrt{s_{{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV compared with CMS and ALICE data [42, 46, 48, 56].$ \hat{q}_0 = 1.5 \rm\; GeV^2/fm $ is represented by the red solid line.By comparing the results in Fig. 3 and Fig. 6, we find that the
$R_{{AA}}$ distributions of all four final-state hadrons in Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV collisions are slightly less suppressed than those in Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV collisions, which agrees with the experimental observation of charged hadron$R_{AA}$ measurements by ALICE [28] and CMS [27].Now, we are able to demonstrate the scaled ratios
$ R^{\rm{Xe}}_{\rm{Pb}} $ of charged hadrons,$ \pi^0,\ \eta $ , and ϕ as functions of$ p_{\rm{T}} $ in 0%–5%, the most central collisions in Fig. 7, with the experimental data points of charged hadron production provided by CMS [27], and the ratio of the p+p reference at 5.44 TeV over that at 5.02 TeV,$\left(\frac{{\rm d}\sigma_{5.44}^{pp}}{{\rm d}p_{\rm{T}}}/\frac{{\rm d}\sigma_{5.02}^{pp}}{{\rm d}p_{\rm{T}}}\right)$ , is also plotted as the "scaled p+p reference" (dotted line), which represents contributions from the differences in collision energies. The scaled ratios of all four final-state hadrons are found at the best value of$ \hat{q}_0 $ in both the Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb systems. The calculation results for charged hadrons agree with the experimental data within the margin of error. The predictions for$ \pi^0,\ \eta $ , and ϕ almost coincide with the charged hadron curve. The deviation of$ R^{\rm{Xe}}_{\rm{Pb}} $ from the p+p reference ratio suggests that production suppression in Xe+Xe collisions is smaller than that in Pb+Pb collisions and shows that a larger system size contributes more suppression to the nuclear modification factor, which is consistent with the comparison of$R_{{AA}}$ in these two systems. We note that although cold nuclear matter (CNM) effects from nPDFs may impact particle yields at large$ p_{\rm{T}} $ in A+A collisions, their contributions to$ R^{\rm{Xe}}_{\rm{Pb}} $ are negligible with the understanding that CNM effects largely cancel each other out where the scaled ratio is concerned.Figure 7. (color online) Scaled ratio
$ R^{\rm{Xe}}_{\rm{Pb}} $ of charged hadron,$ \pi^0,\ \eta $ , and ϕ production in 0%–5% central collisions compared with the CMS data on charged hadrons [27].
Particle production at large pT in Xe+Xe collisions with jet quenching using the higher twist approach
- Received Date: 2022-03-25
- Available Online: 2022-10-15
Abstract: The production of