Erratum: Lattice study of the two-photon decay widths for scalar and pseudo-scalar charmonium [Chin. Phys. C 44(8), 083108 (2020)]

Ying Chen; Ming Gong; Ning Li; Chuan Liu; Yu-Bin Liu; Zhaofeng Liu; Jian-Ping Ma; Yu Meng; Chao Xiong; Ke-Long Zhang

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac4bcd

Chinese Physics C> 2022, Vol. 46> Issue(5) : 059001 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac4bcd

Erratum: Lattice study of the two-photon decay widths for scalar and pseudo-scalar charmonium [Chin. Phys. C 44(8), 083108 (2020)]

Ying Chen ^1,2 ,
Ming Gong ^1,2 ,
Ning Li ^3,, ,
Chuan Liu ^4,5 ,
Yu-Bin Liu ⁶ ,
Zhaofeng Liu ^1,2 ,
Jian-Ping Ma ^2,7 ,
Yu Meng ⁸ ,
Chao Xiong ⁸ ,
Ke-Long Zhang ⁸

1.
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
2.
School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3.
School of Science, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an 710032, China
4.
School of Physics and Center for High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
5.
Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, China
6.
School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
7.
Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
8.
School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

References

[1] Zuoheng Zou, Yu Meng, and Chuan Liu, Lattice calculation of χ_c0→2γ decay width, 11 (2021), arXiv:2111.00768

[1]	Wang-Fa Li , Junmou Chen , Qian-Jiu Wang , Zhao-Huan Yu . A Numerical Study on Gauge Symmetry of Electroweak Amplitudes. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-16.
[2]	. Testing Einstein-Maxwell Power-Yang-Mills hair via black hole photon rings. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(1): 015101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae039c
[3]	Wen-Chao Dai , Jie-Dong Jiang , Yin Fan , Xiao Liu , Peng-Cheng Chu , Xi-Jun Wu , Xiao-Hua Li . Systematic study of α decay half-life within cluster-formation model. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(1): 014103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae042c
[4]	Chen Lan , Zi-Xiao Liu , Yan-Gang Miao . Axisymmetric generalization of zero-scalar-curvature solutions from the Schwarzschild metric via Newman-Janis algorithm. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-12.
[5]	Yi Wei Hao , Yi Fei Niu , Zhong Ming Niu . The Role of Fission in Mass Sensitivity Study of the r-process. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(): 1-7. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adfe55
[6]	. Search for the lepton number violation decay ω→π⁺π⁺e⁻e⁻+c.c.. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 103002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade955
[7]	Yuan-Xing Gao . Higher-order inner photon rings of a horizonless ultracompact object with an antiphoton sphere and their interferometric pattern. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 105102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/addc52
[8]	Zhuoyi Pang , Jian-Hui Zhang , Dian-Jun Zhao . Moments from momentum derivatives in lattice QCD. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 101001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/aded04
[9]	. Generation of axions and axion-like particles through mass parametric resonance induced by scalar perturbations in the early universe. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 125108. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adfa82
[10]	Saeed Ullah Khan , Javlon Rayimbaev , Zhi-Min Chen , Zdeněk Stuchlík . Circular motion and acceleration of charged particles around magnetized rotating black holes in scalar-tensor-vector gravity. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(9): 095102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/add8fc
[11]	Yang Liu , Rong Wang , Zaiba Mushtaq , Ye Tian , Xionghong He , Hao Qiu , Xurong Chen . Simulation of dark scalar particle sensitivity in η rare decay channels at HIAF. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(3): 034103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad9d1b
[12]	Yang-Yang Xu , De-Xing Zhu , You-Tian Zou , Xi-Jun Wu , Biao He , Xiao-Hua Li . Systematic study on α-decay half-lives of uranium isotopes with a screened electrostatic barrier. Chinese Physics C, 2022, 46(11): 114103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac7fe8
[13]	Hong-Lei Li , Peng-Cheng Lu , Cong-Feng Qiao , Zong-Guo Si , Ying Wang . Study of the Standard Model and Majorana neutrino contributions to ${ B}^{{ +}} { \to} { K}^{{ (*){ \pm}}}{ \mu}^{ +}{ \mu}^{{ \mp}}$. Chinese Physics C, 2019, 43(2): 023101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/43/2/023101
[14]	YAN Jia-Qing , XIE Yu-Guang , HU Tao , LU Jun-Guang , ZHOU Li , QU Guo-Pu , CAI Xiao , NIU Shun-Li , CHEN Hai-Tao . Simulation and performance study of ceramic THGEM. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(6): 066001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/6/066001
[15]	ZHANG Zhou-Li , HE Yuan , ZHANG Bin , LI De-Run , SHI Ai-Min , PAN Gang , DU Xiao-Nan , SUN Lie-Peng . Study of influence of radial matcher section end shape on RFQ cavity frequency. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(7): 077007. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/7/077007
[16]	YE Yan-Lin , ZHOU Xiao-Hong , LIU Wei-Ping , MA Yu-Gang , ZHANG Yu-Hu , XU Fu-Rong . Outline of the progress in the study of radioactive nuclear physics and super-heavy nuclei. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(S2): 1-7.
[17]	ZHU Xiong-Wei , GAO Jie . Study on ILC bunch compressor. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(11): 928-930. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/32/11/016
[18]	SHEN Shui-Fa , YU Xiao-Han . Decay of ⁸³Sr and Discussion of Its Daughter's Band Structures. Chinese Physics C, 2004, 28(S1): 78-80.
[19]	Xu Jianming . Matching Problem of Lattice with Transverse Coupling. Chinese Physics C, 1995, 19(1): 73-81.
[20]	BES Collaboration . Experimental Study of Resonance f₂(1270) in the J/ψ Hadronic Decay. Chinese Physics C, 1993, 17(2): 97-106.

Access

Get Citation

Ying Chen, Ming Gong, Ning Li, Chuan Liu, Yu-Bin Liu, Zhaofeng Liu, Jian-Ping Ma, Yu Meng, Chao Xiong and Ke-Long Zhang. Erratum: Lattice study of the two-photon decay widths for scalar and pseudo-scalar charmonium [Chin. Phys. C 44(8), 083108 (2020)][J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac4bcd

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2022-01-10

Article Metric

Article Views(2070)
PDF Downloads(28)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Erratum: Lattice study of the two-photon decay widths for scalar and pseudo-scalar charmonium [Chin. Phys. C 44(8), 083108 (2020)]

Corresponding author: Ning Li, lining@xatu.edu.cn

1. Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

2. School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

3. School of Science, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an 710032, China

4. School of Physics and Center for High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

5. Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, China

6. School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China

7. Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

8. School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received Date: 2022-01-10

Available Online: 2022-05-15

Abstract:

HTML

It is bought to the authors' attention from a recent study [1] that, one should consider the final state photon exchange symmetry in the process of two-photon decay widths for various charmonia. This renders the form factors in Eq. (23)-Eq. (26) of the original paper differ by a factor of two and the final decay width by a factor of four. Therefore, Eq. (23)-Eq. (26) now should read,

$ \begin{aligned}[b] F(0,0)_{B1} = & 2\times0.1283(1)(3)(77)\;, \\ = &0.2566(2)(6)(154)\; \end{aligned} $

(1)

$ \begin{aligned}[b] F(0,0)_{C1} = & 2\times0.1240(4)(13)(68)\;, \\= &0.248(8)(26)(136)\; \end{aligned} $

(2)

$ \begin{aligned}[b] G(0,0)_{B1} = & 2\times0.1017(7)(102)(126)\;, \\ = &0.2034(14)(204)(252)\; \end{aligned} $

(3)

$ \begin{aligned}[b] G(0,0)_{C1} = & 2\times0.0907(8)(19)(90)\;,\\ = &0.1814(16)(38)(180)\;, \end{aligned} $

(4)

and the decay widths shown in Eq.(27) of the original paper should be modified to the following:

$ \begin{aligned}[b] \Gamma(\eta_c\rightarrow \gamma\gamma)_{B1} = & 4\times1.62(19)\;{\rm{KeV}} , \\ = &6.48(76)\;{\rm{KeV}} , \end{aligned} $

(5)

$ \begin{aligned}[b] \Gamma(\eta_c\rightarrow \gamma\gamma)_{C1} = & 4\times1.51(17)\;{\rm{KeV}} , \\ = &6.04(68)\;{\rm{KeV}} , \end{aligned} $

(6)

$ \begin{aligned}[b] \Gamma(\chi_{c0}\rightarrow \gamma\gamma)_{B1} = & 4\times1.18(38)\;{\rm{KeV}} , \\ = &4.72(152)\;{\rm{KeV}} , \end{aligned} $

(7)

$ \begin{aligned}[b] \Gamma(\chi_{c0}\rightarrow \gamma\gamma)_{C1} = & 4\times0.93(19)\;{\rm{KeV}} , \\ = &3.72(76)\;{\rm{KeV}} . \end{aligned} $

(8)

The decay widths are now in better agreement with the experiment values.

Reference (1)

Erratum: Lattice study of the two-photon decay widths for scalar and pseudo-scalar charmonium [Chin. Phys. C 44(8), 083108 (2020)]

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article