-
As indicated in the introduction section, reaction Q-value is particularly important in the present work, and it relies on distinguishing the decay paths. For the targeted transfer-decay process,
$ ^7 $ Li($ ^{11} $ B,$ ^{14}{\rm{C^*}}\rightarrow $ $ \alpha +^{10}{\rm{Be}} $ )$ \alpha $ , the$ Q $ -value is defined as$ \begin{aligned}[b] Q=& E_{^{10}{{\rm{Be}}}} + E_{\alpha 1} + E_{\alpha 2} - E_{\rm{beam}} \\ =& M_{^{11}{\rm{B}}} + M_{^{7}{\rm{Li}}} - M_{^{10}{{\rm{Be}}}^*} - 2 \times M_{\alpha} \end{aligned}. $
(1) To maintain the high statistics, we solely measure two decay fragments, the forward emitting
$ ^{10} $ Be and$ \alpha $ , and deduce the energy of the remaining$ \alpha $ -particles according to the momentum-energy conservation of the reaction [11, 13]. In this case, the contamination from the fluoride content in the LiF target may contribute to the Q-value and invariant mass spectra (see below). However, by applying the so-called EP-plot method [28], this contamination can mostly be removed.Figure 2 presents the excellent resolution of the Q-value spectrum, which allows us to clearly discriminate the ground state (
$ Q_{\rm{ggg}} \sim 6\; {\rm{MeV}} $ ) and first excited state ($ E_{\rm{x}} \approx 3.4 \; {\rm{MeV}} $ ,$ 2^+ $ ) of$ ^{10} $ Be. At the excitation energy of approximately 6 MeV ($ Q \sim 0\; {\rm{MeV}} $ ), there are four close-by states in$ ^{10} $ Be, namely 5.958 MeV ($ 2^+_2 $ ), 5.96 MeV ($ 1^- $ ), 6.18 MeV ($ 0^+_2 $ ), and 6.26 MeV ($ 2^- $ ) states, which cannot be separated in the Q-value spectrum and will be labeled as$ \sim 6\; {\rm{MeV}} $ states. We note that the extremely large reaction Q-value of the reaction considered in this study, [$ ^7 $ Li($ ^{11} $ B,$ ^{14}{\rm{C}} $ )$ \alpha $ ,$ Q = 18.13\; {\rm{MeV}} $ ], is crucial in eliminating the background from other reactions with significantly lower Q-values. Furthermore, to achieve the required Q-value resolution, it is important to have optimal energy resolutions for the incident beam and detection system, as well as a small energy loss in the target [11].Figure 2. (color online) Q-value spectrum for the reaction
$^7$ Li($^{11}$ B,$^{14}{\rm{C^*}}\rightarrow\alpha +^{10}{{\rm{Be}}}$ )$\alpha$ , calculated using the measured$^{10}$ Be and$\alpha$ -particle at forward angles and another$\alpha$ with deduced energy (refer to text for details). The peaks in the spectrum are associated with the ground and excited states (as marked) of the final fragment$^{10}$ Be.Using the two decay fragments measured by L0 and R0 telescopes, namely the
$ ^{10} $ Be and$ \alpha $ -particle, the relative energy (or decay energy) of the resonances in$ ^{14} $ C can be reconstructed according to the standard invariant mass (IM) method [6, 11, 13, 14]. A contamination reaction,$ ^7 $ Li($ ^{11} $ B,$ ^{10}{\rm{Be}} $ )$ ^8{\rm{Be}}\rightarrow 2\alpha $ , might emerge. This reaction possesses the same final mass combination as our targeted reaction and hence cannot be eliminated by the Q-value selection. We verified this assertion by using the two-dimensional Dalitz-plot corresponding to the reconstruction of$ ^{14} $ C and$ ^{8} $ Be. It was determined that the$ ^8 $ Be decay does not significantly affect the$ ^{14} $ C decay owing , most likely, to the angular coverage of the L0(R0) telescope that is not in favor of detecting the recoil$ ^8 $ Be remnants. The excitation-energy (relative energy plus the corresponding separation energy) spectra, conditioned by the Q-value peaks as presented in Fig. 2, can be fitted by continuum backgrounds plus a number of resonance peaks. The continuum backgrounds appear similar to those presented in Fig. 2 of Ref. [11] but with significantly less relative contributions, owing to the actual selection of the reaction channel. In Fig. 3, we plot the spectra with the backgrounds subtracted, to obtain a better illustration of the resonance peaks. Each peak curve in the figure is a convolution of the Breit-Wigner (BW) function with the Gaussian-type energy-resolution function [14]. The energy resolution functions and detection efficiency (acceptance) curves, as a function of the relative energy, were simulated by considering a reasonable angular distribution of the produced$ ^{14} $ C and its decay fragments, as well as the actual detection setup, energy and position resolutions of the detectors, and applied cuts in the data analysis [11, 14]. Because the efficiency curves (Fig. 3) do not significantly affect he number of counts and the width of each peak [14], we did not incorporate them into the BW resonance shape.Figure 3. (color online) Excitation-energy (relative energy plus the corresponding separation energy) spectra conditioned by the Q-value peaks in Fig. 2 and with the continuum backgrounds subtracted [11]. The peak curves (red-solid lines) are BW functions convoluted by energy resolution functions, obtained by fitting to the experimental spectra. The simulated detection efficiency curves (yellow-dashed lines) are also plotted with an arbitrary unit. The vertical blue-dashed lines are used to guide the eyes for the peak positions of the resonances.
Novel evidence for the σ-bond linear-chain molecular structure in 14C
- Received Date: 2021-05-01
- Available Online: 2021-08-15
Abstract: A multi-nucleon transfer and cluster decay experiment,