-
In the ImQMD model, as in the original QMD model [50], each nucleon is represented by a coherent state of a Gaussian wave packet
$ \phi _{i}({ r}) = \frac{1}{(2\pi \sigma _{r}^{2})^{3/4}}\exp \left[-\frac{( { r}-{ r}_{i})^{2}}{4\sigma _{r}^{2}}+\frac{i}{\hbar}{ r}\cdot { p}_{i}\right], $
(1) where
$ { r}_{i} $ and$ { p}_{i} $ are the centers of the$ i $ th wave packet in the coordinate and momentum space, respectively.$ \sigma _{r} $ represents the spatial spread of the wave packet in the coordinate space. The time evolution of$ { r}_{i} $ and$ { p}_{i} $ for each nucleon is governed by Hamiltonian equations of motion$ \dot{{ r}}_{i} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial { p}_{i}},\quad \dot{ { p}}_{i} = -\frac{\partial H}{\partial { r}_{i}}. $
(2) The Hamiltonian of the system includes the kinetic energy
$ T = \displaystyle\sum\limits_{i} \displaystyle\frac{{ p}_{i}^{2}}{2m} $ and effective interaction potential energy$ H = T+U_{{\rm Coul}}+U_{{\rm loc}}, $
(3) where
$ U_{{\rm Coul}} $ is the Coulomb energy, which is written as the sum of the direct and the exchange contribution$\begin{split} U_{{\rm Coul}} =& \frac{1}{2}\int\int{\rho_{p}({{r}})} \frac{e^{2}}{|{{r}}-{{r}}'|}{\rho_{p}({{r}}')}{\rm d}{{r}}{\rm d}{{r}}'\\ &-e^{2}\frac{3}{4}(\frac{3}{\pi})^{1/3}\int\rho_{p}^{4/3}{\rm d}{{r}}. \end{split} $
(4) Here,
$ \rho_{p} $ is the density distribution of protons in the system. The nuclear interaction potential energy$ U_{ \rm{loc}} $ is obtained from the integration of the Skyrme energy density functional$ U = \int V_{ \rm{loc}}({ r}){\rm d}{ r} $ without the spin-orbit term, which reads$ \begin{split} V_{{\rm loc}} =& \frac{\alpha }{2}\frac{\rho ^{2}}{\rho _{0}}+\frac{\beta }{\gamma +1} \frac{\rho ^{\gamma +1}}{\rho _{0}^{\gamma }}+\frac{g_{\rm sur}}{2\rho _{0}} (\nabla \rho )^{2}\\ &+\frac{C_{s}}{2\rho _{0}}(\rho ^{2}-\kappa _{s}(\nabla \rho )^{2})\delta ^{2} + g_{\tau}\frac{\rho ^{\eta +1}}{\rho_{0}^{\eta }}. \end{split} $
(5) Here,
$ \rho = \rho_{n}+\rho_{p} $ is the nucleon density.$ \delta = (\rho_{n}-\rho_{p})/ $ $ (\rho_{n}+\rho_{p}) $ is the isospin asymmetry. The first three terms in the above expression are directly obtained from the Skyrme interaction. The fourth term denotes the symmetry potential energy including the bulk and surface symmetry potential energies. The last term is a small correction term. The parameters named IQ2 (see Table 1) adopted in this work have been tested for describing the fusion reactions [51], MNT reactions [31-33, 52], and fragmentation reactions [53]. The phase space occupation constraint method proposed by Papa et al. in the constrained molecular dynamics (CoMD) model [54] is adopted to describe the fermionic nature of the N-body system. This greatly improves the stability of an individual nucleus.$ \alpha $ $ /\rm{MeV}$ $ \beta $ $/\rm{MeV} $ $ \gamma $ $ g_{\rm sur} $ $/( \rm{MeV}\cdot \rm{fm}^{2})$ $ g_{\tau} $ $/\rm{MeV}$ $ \eta $ $ C_{S} $ $ /\rm{MeV} $ $ \kappa_{s} $ $ /\rm{fm}^{2} $ $ \rho_{0} $ $ /\rm{fm}^{-3} $ −356 303 7/6 7.0 12.5 2/3 32.0 0.08 0.165 Table 1. Model parameters (IQ2) adopted in this study.
In this study, we set the z-axis as the beam direction and the x-axis as the impact parameter direction. The initial distance of the center of mass between the projectile and target is 30 fm. The wave-packet width is set as
$ \sigma_r = 1.2 $ fm. The dynamic simulation is stopped at 1000 fm/c. Subsequently, the GEMINI code [55, 56] is used to deal with the subsequent de-excitation process. The evaporation of the light particles is treated by the Hauser-Feshbach theory [57] including n, p, d, t, 3He,$ \alpha $ , 6He, 6-8Li, and 7-10Be channels. The level density in the GEMINI code is obtained by the Fermi gas expression$ \rho(U,J) = (2J+1)\left[\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2{\cal I}}\right]^{3/2}\frac{\sqrt{a}}{12}\frac{\exp(2\sqrt{aU})}{U^{2}}, $
(6) where
$ {\cal I} $ is the moment-of-inertia of the residual nucleus or saddle-point configuration. The level density parameter was taken as$ a = A/8~{\rm MeV}^{-1} $ as usual. -
To test the ImQMD model in terms of the description of MNT reactions, we calculate the collisions of 40Ca + 124Sn at
$ E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 128.5 $ MeV. The range of the impact parameters in the calculations is from 0 to$ b_{ \rm{max}} $ fm.$ b_{ \rm{max}} = R_ {\rm{P}}+R_ {\rm{T}} $ , where$ R_ {\rm{P}} $ and$ R_ {\rm{T}} $ denote the radii of the projectile and target, respectively. The incident energy is slightly higher than the Coulomb barrier (120.1 MeV). For central collisions, most events are fusion reactions. Fusion and elastic scattering events are not taken into account in our analysis. Figure 1 shows that the angular distributions of the final projectile-like-fragments (PLFs) with different transfer channels in 40Ca + 124Sn at$ E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 128.5 $ MeV. The grazing angle in the laboratory frame is$ 75^\circ $ . The calculated maximum of the cross-sections decreases more quickly with increasing neutron pickup channel than the experimental data [34]. However, the positions of the maximum are always consistent with the experimental data, which are locate at the grazing angle with a small dependence on the channel.Figure 1. (color online) Angular distributions of the final PLFs with different transfer channels in 40Ca+124Sn at
$E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 128.5$ MeV. The experimental data are taken from Ref. [34].Figure 2 shows the production cross-sections of the final PLFs in the 40Ca + 124Sn reaction at
$ E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 128.5 $ MeV. The squares and folding lines denote the calculations of the ImQMD model and CWKB theory [34] following evaporation, respectively. The experimental data are taken from Ref. [34]. The measured isotopic cross-sections have been obtained by integrating the angular distributions by a quasi-Gaussian fit. Fig. 2 shows that the ImQMD calculations are in reasonable agreement with the corresponding experimental data. The discrepancies between the calculated and experimental data are generally within one order of magnitude. One sees that the CWKB calculations reproduce the experimental data very well at the neutron-rich side of the distributions for the proton stripping channels from 0p (Z = 20) to –4p (Z = 16). However, the calculations grossly underestimate the cross-sections by several orders of magnitude at the neutron-deficient side. We do not show the calculations on the target-like-fragments (TLFs) because of the absence of experimental data. These results indicate that the ImQMD model is applicable for the study of MNT reactions in intermediate-mass systems.Figure 2. (color online) Production cross sections of the final PLFs in 40Ca+124Sn at
$E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 128.5$ MeV. The black squares and folding lines denote the calculations of the ImQMD model and CWKB theory [34] following evaporation, respectively. The experimental data are taken from Ref. [34].In order to produce the neutron-deficient nuclei near N, Z = 50, choosing a favorable projectile-target combination is very important. Considering that the production cross sections at the maximum of the isotopic distributions decrease rapidly with increasing proton transfer channel, we choose the neutron-deficient nuclei, 106Cd and 112Sn, as targets. Figure 3 shows the calculated production cross-sections of final TLFs with charge numbers from Z = 50 to 54 in reactions of 48Ca + 112Sn, 40Ca + 112Sn, 58Ni + 112Sn, and 106Cd + 112Sn. The production cross-sections of the exotic neutron-deficient nuclei are the smallest in the 48Ca + 112Sn system, hence this system is not suitable to produce such nuclei. For 40Ca + 112Sn, 58Ni + 112Sn, and 106Cd + 112Sn reactions, one can see that the discrepancies of the cross-sections in the neutron-rich side are very significant. This is because the cross-section in the neutron-rich side is very sensitive to the N/Z value of the projectile. The N/Z values for 40Ca, 58Ni, and 106Cd are 1.00, 1.07, and 1.21, respectively. Therefore, the production cross-sections of neutron-rich isotopes in 106Cd + 112Sn are larger than those in the other two reactions. The isotopic distributions are similar for the three systems in the neutron-deficient side. This is because the primary distributions of three systems are almost the same in the neutron-deficient side.
Figure 3. (color online) Calculated production cross sections of final TLFs with charge number from Z = 50 to 54 in different reactions at
$E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 280 $ MeV.In MNT reactions, the energy dissipation process is a complex issue. The excitation energy of the reaction products plays an important role in their de-excitation processes. In the ImQMD model, the excitation energy of an excited fragment is calculated as
$ E^* = E_{ \rm{tot}}-E_ {\rm{b}} $ . Here,$ E_{ \rm{tot}} $ and$ E_ {\rm{b}} $ denote the total and binding energies in the ground state, respectively. The total energy of a fragment is the sum of all kinetic and potential energy of a nucleon in the body frame. Figure 4(a) shows the average excitation energy of the products in binary events as a function of the impact parameters in 106Cd + 112Sn at$ E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 500 $ MeV. In the region of$ b\geqslant 6 $ d fm, the total excitation energy of the system increases rapidly with decreasing impact parameters, until it reaches a saturation value (about 145 MeV) at$ b<5 $ fm. The decay properties of the nuclei near the 100Sn are markedly different with neutron-rich nuclei. In the experiment, the emissions of proton and$ \alpha $ particles were observed in the decay processes of some specific nuclei even in their ground state. For the de-excitation processes of these nuclei in excited states, the decay channels would be more complex. Figure 4(b) shows the yields of n, p, d, t, 3He, and$ \alpha $ particles as a function of impact parameters in the 106Cd + 112Sn system at$ E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 500 $ MeV. The charged particles' emission plays an important role at small impact parameters in the de-excitation processes of the system. The number of emitted protons are much greater than that of other emitted charged particles. In the GEMINI simulation, we find that the protons emission is the main decay channel for exotic neutron-deficient nuclei. In addition, the yields of the$ \alpha $ and d particles are considerable at small impact parameters. This results in a decrease of the yield of neutrons with a decrease in the impact parameter at$ b<6 $ fm. Figure 4(c) illustrates the cross-sections for the formation of iodine isotopes (Z = 53) in the collisions of 106Cd + 112Sn at$ E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 500 $ MeV. The open squares depict the unknown proton-rich nuclei. The final yields shift to the neutron-deficient side after the de-excitation process. More neutrons are evaporated on the neutron-rich side than on the neutron-deficient side after the de-excitation process. This is because the neutron emission is the dominant decay channel for neutron-rich nuclei.Figure 4. (color online) (a) Average excitation energy of the products in binary events as a function of impact parameters in 106Cd + 112Sn at
$E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 500$ MeV. (b) Yields of n, p, d, t, 3He, and$\alpha$ particles as a function of impact parameters in the 106Cd + 112Sn system at$E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 500$ MeV. (c) Cross-sections for formation of iodine isotopes (Z = 53) in collision of 106Cd + 112Sn at$E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 500$ MeV. Solid circles and squares denote the distribution of primary and final fragments, respectively. Open squares denote the unknown neutron-deficient isotopes.Figure 5 shows the calculated isotopic distributions of final TLFs with charge number from Z = 50 to 54 by the ImQMD model in the reactions of 106Cd+112Sn at
$ E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = $ 300, 500, and 780 MeV. The isotopic production cross-sections in the neutron-rich side become lower with increasing incident energies. The neutron evaporation is the main decay channel for the primary neutron-rich products. In the case of larger incident energy, this causes a larger shift of final distributions to the neutron-deficient side. While in the neutron-deficient side, isotopic distributions are almost the same for these three incident energies. Generally, larger incident energy improves the transfer probability of nucleons, which leads to a larger production cross-section for the primary neutron-deficient nuclei. However, the survival probability of these nuclei is lower due to higher excitation energies. If the incident energy continues to increase, the production cross-sections of the exotic neutron-deficient nuclei should be reduced, because the reactions are dominated by fragmentation mechanisms.Figure 5. (color online) Calculated isotopic distributions of final fragments by the ImQMD model in reactions of 106Cd + 112Sn at
$E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = $ 300, 500, and 780 MeV. Dashed lines indicate the boundaries of known isotopes.Table 2 shows the comparison of calculated production cross-sections for exotic neutron-deficient nuclei from the MNT reactions with measured values from the fragmentation and fusion-evaporation reactions. The measured cross-sections from the fragmentation method are obtained in the reaction of 345 MeV/A 124Xe + Be [2, 6]. For the fusion-evaporation method, the cross sections of 100In and 101Sn are measured in the 58Ni + 58Ni system [25] at
$ E_{ \rm{lab}} = 348 $ MeV; 100Sn is measured in 50Cr + 58Ni [26] at$ E_{ \rm{lab}} = 255 $ MeV; 108I, 109Xe, and 110Xe are measured in 58Ni + 54Fe [58] at$ E_{ \rm{lab}} = 255 $ , 200, and 215 MeV, respectively. The cross-sections of these isotopes from the MNT method are calculated with 106Cd + 112Sn at$ E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 500 $ MeV using the ImQMD model. For the fusion-evaporation reactions, the production cross sections of the residual nucleus are one or two orders of magnitude lower than those from the multinucleon transfer reactions. For the projectile fragmentation, the production cross-sections of these nuclei are much lower. For example, the cross-sections of 100Sn by projectile fragmentation is only on the order of 10−10 millibarn. Therefore, the MNT reactions have advantages in comparison to fusion-evaporation and projectile fragmentation reactions. Figure 6 shows the neutron-deficient nuclei region around 100Sn on the nuclear map. The filled and open squares denote the known and the predicted nuclei, respectively. Yellow, red, and olive colors indicate$ \alpha $ decay,$ \beta^{+} $ decay, and proton decay, respectively. The production cross-sections with the ImQMD model in the reaction of 106Cd + 112Sn at$ E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 500 $ MeV are signed in the graph. Several new neutron-deficient nuclei are produced in the 106Cd + 112Sn reaction. The corresponding production cross-sections for the new neutron-deficient nuclei, 101, 102Sb, 103Te, and 106, 107I, are 2.0 nb, 4.1 nb, 6.5 nb, 0.4$ \mu $ b and 1.0$ \mu $ b, respectively.isotope $\sigma^{ \rm{expt}}_{ \rm{frag}}$ /mb$\sigma^{ \rm{expt}}_{ \rm{fus}}$ /mb$\sigma^{ \rm{theo}}_{ \rm{MNT}}$ /mb97In $1.3\times10^{-10}$ [6]– $7.2\times10^{-6}$ 98In $1.4\times10^{-8}\; $ [6]– $3.5\times10^{-3}$ 99In $2.2\times10^{-7}\; $ [2]– $2.0\times10^{-2}$ 100In $8.6\times10^{-6}\; $ [2]$1.7\times10^{-3}$ [25]$3.8\times10^{-2}$ 100Sn $7.4\times10^{-10}$ [2]$4.0\times10^{-5}$ [26]$1.1\times10^{-3}$ 101Sn $4.0\times10^{-8}\; $ [2]$1.3\times10^{-5}$ [25]$5.0\times10^{-3}$ 102Sn $2.2\times10^{-6}\; $ [2]– $3.9\times10^{-2}$ 103Sn $7.7\times10^{-5}\; $ [2]– $1.8\times10^{-1}$ 104Sb $3.5\times10^{-7}\; $ [2]– $1.9\times10^{-3}$ 105Te $1.2\times10^{-9}\; $ [2]– $6.6\times10^{-5}$ 106Te $1.3\times10^{-7}\; $ [2]– $1.2\times10^{-2}$ 108I – $8.6\times10^{-4}$ [58]$1.6\times10^{-3}$ 109Xe – $1.0\times10^{-5}$ [58]$2.0\times10^{-5}$ 110Xe – $1.0\times10^{-3}$ [58]$3.0\times10^{-3}$ Table 2. Comparison of calculated production cross-sections for exotic neutron-deficient nuclei from MNT reactions with measured values from fragmentation and fusion-evaporation reactions.
Figure 6. (color online) Neutron-deficient nuclei region around 100Sn on the nuclear map. Filled and open squares denote known and predicted nuclei, respectively. Yellow, red, and olive colors indicate the
$\alpha$ decay,$\beta^{+}$ decay, and proton decay, respectively. The production cross-sections in the reaction of 106Cd + 112Sn at$E_{ \rm{c.m.}} = 500$ MeV are depicted in the graph.
Production of exotic neutron-deficient isotopes near N, Z = 50 in multinucleon transfer reactions
- Received Date: 2019-03-04
- Available Online: 2019-06-01
Abstract: The multinucleon transfer reaction in the collisions of 40Ca+ 124Sn at