By tracing the number of initial quarks in a proton, p (3 iq) accounts for 17.4% at 7.7 GeV, 8.3% at 11.5 GeV, 1.26% at 39 GeV and 0.36% at 200 GeV of all protons and anti-protons at mid- rapidity ($ |{Y}| < 1 $![]()
). p (2 iq) accounts for 80.8% at 7.7 GeV, 84% at 11.5 GeV, 52.83% at 39 GeV and 10.9% at 200 GeV. p (1 iq) accounts for 0.91% at 7.7 GeV, 3% at 11.5 GeV, 12.46% at 39 GeV and 14.4% at 200 GeV. p (0 iq) accounts for 0.45% at 7.7 GeV, 2.4% at 11.5 GeV, 15.4% at 39 GeV and 39.1% at 200 GeV. $ \overline{p} $![]()
accounts for 0.44% at 7.7 GeV, 2.3% at 11.5 GeV, 18.05% at 39 GeV and 35.24% at 200 GeV. The upper panel of Fig. 1 shows the elliptic flow of p (3 iq), p (2 iq), p (1 iq), p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
within $ 0.2 < p_{{\rm T}} < 2.0 $![]()
GeV/c as a function of collision centrality in Au+Au collisions at various collision energies. One finds that $ v_{2} $![]()
shows strong centrality dependence, since it is mainly driven by the initial spatial eccentricity. The lower panel shows the difference of $ v_{2} $![]()
between p (3 iq), p (2 iq), p (1 iq), p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
. The difference of $ v_{2} $![]()
between p (0 iq) (produced) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
does not clearly show the centrality dependence, and is approximately consistent with 0. As we mentioned above, p (0 iq) should be similar to $ \overline{p} $![]()
in many aspects, as they are both made of produced quarks. p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
are produced in the early stage of the system when the energy density is relatively large at low collision energies. Both p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
experience the full evolution of the system, which leads to a similar magnitude of $ v_{2} $![]()
. Larger elliptic flow of p (3 iq) than of p (0 iq) or of $ \overline{p} $![]()
is observed. This suggests that $ v_{2} $![]()
of p (3 iq) derives from the transport from forward rapidity to mid-rapidity due to the nuclear stopping effect. The transported quarks, which are transported over a large rapidity, suffer more scatterings than produced quarks, which results in a larger $ v_{2} $![]()
, and leads to a larger $ v_{2} $![]()
of p (3 iq) than of p (0 iq). The difference of$ v_{2} $![]()
between p (3 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
shows a strong centrality dependence. A larger difference is observed in mid-central collisions than in most central and peripheral collisions at 7.7, 11.5 and 39 GeV. p (3 iq) experiences the whole process where the initial geometry eccentricity is transformed into anisotropy in the momentum space, whereas p (0 iq) may only partly experience this process. The combination of baryon stopping effect and scattering is the cause of the difference of $ v_{2} $![]()
between the transported protons and anti-protons, largest in mid-central collisions. No significant centrality dependence is observed at 200 GeV due to the small difference of $ v_{2} $![]()
between p (3 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
.
The elliptic flow$ v_{2} $![]()
of p (2 iq) and p (1 iq) show similar centrality dependence as $ v_{2} $![]()
of p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
, but are systematically lower . p (0 iq), p (1 iq), p (2 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
are produced at the same time in the early stage via the string excitation scheme [32], but part of p (1 iq) and p (2 iq) are produced in the decay of unstable baryons. This means that the formation time of p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
should be earlier than of p (1 iq) and p (2 iq). Hence, p (1 iq) and p (2 iq) suffer less interactions than p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
. $ v_{2} $![]()
of p (1 iq) and p (2 iq) are smaller than of p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
. Thus, in the UrQMD model, $ v_{2} $![]()
of the inclusive p is slightly lower than, or consistent with, $ v_{2} $![]()
of $ \overline{p} $![]()
, depending on the collision energy, which is consistent with the results in ref [33].
The upper panel of Fig. 2 shows the elliptic flow of p (3 iq), p (2 iq), p (1 iq), p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
as a function of transverse momentum $ p_{{\rm T}} $![]()
in 0%-80% Au+Au collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{{\rm NN}}} $![]()
= 7.7, 11.5, 39, 200 GeV. The lower panel shows the difference of $ v_{2} $![]()
between p (3 iq), p (2 iq), p (1 iq), p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
. The difference of $ v_{2} $![]()
between p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
does not show a clear $ p_{{\rm T}} $![]()
dependence, and is almost consistent with 0 , except at 7.7 GeV. However, the difference of $ v_{2} $![]()
between p (3 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
shows a weak $ p_{{\rm T}} $![]()
dependence. The splitting of $ v_{2} $![]()
between p (3 iq) and p (0 iq) may be due to the stronger flow of transported quarks, which experience more interactions than produced quarks. This phenomenon is consistent with the study in ref [22], by assuming that $ v_{2} $![]()
of transported quarks is larger than of produced quarks, and results in a splitting of $ v_{2} $![]()
between protons and anti-protons. $ v_{2} $![]()
of p (2 iq) and p (1 iq) increase with $ p_{{\rm T}} $![]()
, but are systematically smaller than of p (3 iq), p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
.
In order to compare with the STAR results, we calculate the integrated elliptic flow $ v_{2} $![]()
of p (3 iq), p (2 iq), p (1 iq), p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
in the interval$ 0.2 < p_{{\rm T}} < 2.0 $![]()
GeV/c . In Fig. 3, panel (a) shows the integrated elliptic flow $ v_{2} $![]()
of p (3 iq), p (2 iq), p (1 iq), p (0 iq) and, panel (b) shows the difference in $ v_{2} $![]()
between the STAR measurements and the UrQMD model, as function of the collision energy in Au+Au collisions. $ v_{2} $![]()
of p (3 iq) is systematically larger than of p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
. Thus, the $ v_{2} $![]()
difference between p (3 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
is larger than 0. The $ v_{2} $![]()
difference between p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
is slightly smaller than 0, or consistent with 0, depending on the collision energy. $ v_{2} $![]()
of p (2 iq) and p (1 iq) are systematically smaller than of p (3 iq), p (0 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
. Therefore, the difference of $ v_{2} $![]()
between p (2 iq)/p (1 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
is smaller than 0. The difference of $ v_2 $![]()
between p (3 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
shows a similar energy dependence as the STAR results. Our results for p (3 iq) - $ \overline{p} $![]()
show good agreement with the STAR results below 11.5 GeV. At 39 GeV, the $ v_{2} $![]()
difference of p (3 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
is not consistent with the STAR results quantitatively. The yield of p (3 iq) is relatively smaller than of p (2 iq) and p (1 iq), and $ v_{2} $![]()
of all protons is much smaller than the STAR result. This indicates that the $ v_{2} $![]()
difference with respect to STAR measurements may be partly due to the $ v_{2} $![]()
difference between p (3 iq) and $ \overline{p} $![]()
. However, it can not explain the STAR results. In principle, the yield of p (3 iq) dominates the yield of protons at low energies. The magnitude of the $ v_{2} $![]()
difference p (3 iq) - $ \overline{p} $![]()
, as the STAR data and the UrQMD model are consistent for Au+Au collisions at 7.7 and 11.5 GeV, suggests that the hadronic interactions are dominant at these collision energies. The $ v_{2} $![]()
difference between the STAR results and our calculations at 39 GeV indicates that the partonic interactions are also important for the increase of $ v_{2} $![]()
at high energies. Additionally, the fact that the fraction of p (3 iq) relative to inclusive protons decreases with increasing energy, can also lead to such a difference.