Impact factor of Chinese Physics C is 3.6 in 2023 Impact factor of Chinese Physics C is 3.6 in 2022 2021 Impact Factor 2.944
Advanced Search
×
近期发现有不法分子冒充我刊与作者联系，借此进行欺诈等不法行为，请广大作者加以鉴别，如遇诈骗行为，请第一时间与我刊编辑部联系确认（《中国物理C》（英文）编辑部电话：010-88235947,010-88236950），并作报警处理。
本刊再次郑重声明：
（1）本刊官方网址为cpc.ihep.ac.cn和https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1674-1137
（2）本刊采编系统作者中心是投稿的唯一路径，该系统为ScholarOne远程稿件采编系统，仅在本刊投稿网网址（https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/cpc）设有登录入口。本刊不接受其他方式的投稿，如打印稿投稿、E-mail信箱投稿等，若以此种方式接收投稿均为假冒。
（3）所有投稿均需经过严格的同行评议、编辑加工后方可发表，本刊不存在所谓的“编辑部内部征稿”。如果有人以“编辑部内部人员”名义帮助作者发稿，并收取发表费用，均为假冒。
                  
《中国物理C》（英文）编辑部
2024年10月30日
Chinese Physics C> 2017, Vol. 41> Issue(10) : 101001 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/10/101001

On the decays of d* in a constituent chiral quark model

  • 1.

     Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

  • 2.

     Theoretical Physics Center for Science Facilities(TPCSF), CAS, Beijing 100049, China

  • 3.

     School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China

  • 4.

      School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China

  • 5.

     College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China

  • After summarizing the experimental results and present status of the d*(2380) observed at WASA@COSY, two "extreme" models for explaining its structure, a compact hexaquark dominated model and a loose △△'-D12π model, are briefly discussed, especially the former. By comparing their results with the corresponding data, the differences of the two models are addressed. As a remedy for the latter model, a mixing model and its result are also quoted for a comparison. It is shown that the compact hexaquark dominated structure might be more promising. However, the mixing model is also a possible structure, and more accurate Γd*→NNπ data are needed for confirmation.
      PCAS:
  • 加载中

  • References

    [1] H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rept., 639:1(2016)
    [2] H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Rept. Prog. Phys., 80(7):076201(2017)
    [3] F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meissner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B. S. Zou, arXiv:1705.00141[hep-ph]
    [4] Y. Dong, A. Faessler, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 94:282(2017)
    [5] A. Ali, J. S. Lange, and S. Stone, arXiv:1706.00610[hep-ph]
    [6] H. Clement, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 93:195(2017) arXiv:1610.0559v1[Nucl-ex]
    [7] M. Bashkanov et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 102 052301(2009)
    [8] P. Adlarson et al (WASA-at-COSY Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:242302(2011)
    [9] P. Adlarson et al (WASA-at-COSY Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B, 721:229(2013); Phys. Rev. C, 88:055208(2013); Phys. Lett. B, 743:325(2015)
    [10] M. Bashkanov, H. Clement, and T. Skorodko, Eur. Phys. J. A, 51:87(2015)
    [11] P. Adlarson et al (WASA-at-COSY Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 112(20):202301(2014)
    [12] COSY confirms existence of six-quark states:CERN COURIER, Vol. 54, No. 6, p6, July 23, 2014
    [13] M. Bashkanov, Stanley J. Brodsky, and H. Clement, Phys. Lett. B, 727:438(2013)
    [14] X. Q. Yuan et al, Phys. Rev. C, 60:045203(1999)
    [15] A. Gal and H. Garcilazo, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:172301(2013)
    [16] A. Gal and H. Garcilazo, Nucl. Phys. A, 928:73(2014)
    [17] The WASA-at-COSY Collaboration, arXiv:1702.07212V1[nucl-ex]
    [18] J. Dyson, Phys Rev. Lett., 13:815(1964)
    [19] T. Kamae and T. Fujita, Phys. Rev. Lett., 38:471(1977)
    [20] P. J. Mulders, A. T. M. Aerts, and J. J. De Swart, Phys. Rev. D, 21:2653(1980)
    [21] M. Oka and K. Yazaki, Phys. Lett., 90B:41(1980)
    [22] P. J. Mulders and A. W. Thomas, J. Phys. G, 9:1159(1983)
    [23] M. Cvetic, B. Golli, N. Mankoc-Borstnik, and M. Rosina, Phys. Lett. B, 93:489(1980)
    [24] K. Maltman, Nucl. Phys. A, 438:669(1985)
    [25] T. Goldman et al, Phys. Rev. C, 39:1889(1989)
    [26] R. D. Mota, A. Valcarce, F. Fernandez, D. R. Entem, and H. Garcilazo, Phys. Rev. C, 65:034006(2002)
    [27] J. L. Ping, H. X. Huang, H. R. Pang, F. Wang, and C. W. Wong, Phys. Rev. C, 79:024001(2009)
    [28] H. Huang, J. Ping, and F. Wang, Phys. Rev. C, 89(3):034001(2014)
    [29] F. Huang, Z. Y. Zhang, P. N. Shen, and W. L. Wang, Chin. Phys. C, 39(7):071001(2015)
    [30] F. Huang, P. N. Shen, Y. B. Dong, and Z. Y. Zhang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 59(2):622002(2016)
    [31] A. Gal, Acta Phys. Polon. B, 47:471(2016)
    [32] A. Gal, EPJ Web Conf., 130:01030(2016)
    [33] M. N. Platonova and V. I. Kukulin, Phys. Rev. C, 87:025202(2013)
    [34] M. N. Platonova and V. I. Kukulin, Nucl. Phys. A, 946:117(2016)
    [35] M. N. Platonova and V. I. Kukulin, Phys. Rev. D, 94(5):054039(2016)
    [36] H. X. Chen, E. L. Cui, W. Chen, T. G. Steele, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. C, 91(2):025204(2015)
    [37] W. Park, A. Park, and S. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. D, 92(1):014037(2015)
    [38] J. A. Niskanen, Phys. Rev. C, 95(5):054002(2017)
    [39] A. Gal, Phys. Lett. B, 769:436(2017)
    [40] Z. Y. Zhang, Y. W. Yu, P. N. Shen, L. R. Dai, A. Faessler, and U. Straub, Nucl. Phys. A, 625:59(1997); L. R. Dai, Z. Y. Zhang, Y. W. Yu, and P. Wang, Nucl. Phys. A, 727:321(2003)
    [41] Q. B. Li, P. N. Shen, Z. Y. Zhang, Y. W. Yu, X. Q. Yuan, and S. Yang, J. Phys. G, 25:1807(1999); Q. B. Li, P. N. Shen, Z. Y. Zhang, and Y. W. Yu, Nucl. Phys. A, 683:487(2001)
    [42] Yubing Dong, Pengnian Shen, Fei Huang, and Zongye Zhang, Phys. Rev. C, 91:064002(2015)
    [43] Yubing Dong, Fei Huang, Pengnian Shen, and Zongye Zhang, Phys. Rev. C, 94:014003(2016)
    [44] M. Albaladejo and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. C, 88:014006(2013)
    [45] X. Cao, B. S. Zou, and H. S. Xu, Phys. Rev. C, 81:065201(2010)
    [46] F. Hinterberger and A. Sibirtsev, Eur. Phys. J. A, 21:313(2004)
    [47] A. I. Titov, B. Kampfer, and B. L. Reznik, Eur. Phys. J. A, 7:543(2000)
    [48] V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and U. G. Meissner, Eur. Phys. J. A, 4:259(1999)
    [49] Yubing Dong, Fei Huang, Pengnian Shen, and Zongye Zhang, arXiv:1702.03658v2[nucl-th]; Phys. Lett. B, 769:223-226(2017)

  • Access

    加载中

Get Citation
Yubing Dong, Fei Huang, Pengnian Shen and Zongye Zhang. On the decays of d* in a constituent chiral quark model[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(10): 101001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/10/101001
Yubing Dong, Fei Huang, Pengnian Shen and Zongye Zhang. On the decays of d* in a constituent chiral quark model[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(10): 101001.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/10/101001 shu
Milestone
Received: 2017-07-08
Fund

    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11475192, 11475181, 11521505, 11565007, 11635009), fund provided to the Sino-German CRC 110 Symmetries and the Emergence of Structure in QCD project by NSFC (11621131001), the IHEP Innovation Fund (Y4545190Y2) and F. Huang is grateful for the support of the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (2015358)

Article Metric

Article Views(1735)
PDF Downloads(22)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

On the decays of d* in a constituent chiral quark model

    Corresponding author: Yubing Dong,
    Corresponding author: Fei Huang,
    Corresponding author: Pengnian Shen,
    Corresponding author: Zongye Zhang,
  • 1. Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 2. Theoretical Physics Center for Science Facilities(TPCSF), CAS, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3. School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
  • 4.  School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
  • 5. College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
  • Received Date: 2017-07-08
  • Available Online: 2017-10-05
Fund Project:  Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11475192, 11475181, 11521505, 11565007, 11635009), fund provided to the Sino-German CRC 110 Symmetries and the Emergence of Structure in QCD project by NSFC (11621131001), the IHEP Innovation Fund (Y4545190Y2) and F. Huang is grateful for the support of the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (2015358)

Abstract: After summarizing the experimental results and present status of the d*(2380) observed at WASA@COSY, two "extreme" models for explaining its structure, a compact hexaquark dominated model and a loose △△'-D12π model, are briefly discussed, especially the former. By comparing their results with the corresponding data, the differences of the two models are addressed. As a remedy for the latter model, a mixing model and its result are also quoted for a comparison. It is shown that the compact hexaquark dominated structure might be more promising. However, the mixing model is also a possible structure, and more accurate Γd*→NNπ data are needed for confirmation.

    HTML

Reference (49)

目录

Link
IOPScience
SCOAP3
arXiv
Chinese Physical Society
Journal information
Introduction
Editorial Board
Others
Subscribe
Contact us
QQ: 1307685413
Tel: +86-010-88235947
Fax: +86-010-88233126
E-mail: cpc@ihep.ac.cn

  • CPC Website

  • IOP Website

  • CPC WeChat

Copyright © Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19B Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China 京ICP备05002789号-1

Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  E-mail: info@rhhz.net

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return