Comment on “Proof of ‘Irreducibility Postulation’ and Its Applications”

Zhao Yumin; Chen Jinquan

近期发现有不法分子冒充我刊与作者联系，借此进行欺诈等不法行为，请广大作者加以鉴别，如遇诈骗行为，请第一时间与我刊编辑部联系确认（《中国物理C》（英文）编辑部电话：010-88235947,010-88236950），并作报警处理。

本刊再次郑重声明：

（1）本刊官方网址为cpc.ihep.ac.cn和https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1674-1137

（2）本刊采编系统作者中心是投稿的唯一路径，该系统为ScholarOne远程稿件采编系统，仅在本刊投稿网网址（https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/cpc）设有登录入口。本刊不接受其他方式的投稿，如打印稿投稿、E-mail信箱投稿等，若以此种方式接收投稿均为假冒。

（3）所有投稿均需经过严格的同行评议、编辑加工后方可发表，本刊不存在所谓的“编辑部内部征稿”。如果有人以“编辑部内部人员”名义帮助作者发稿，并收取发表费用，均为假冒。

《中国物理C》（英文）编辑部

2024年10月30日

Chinese Physics C> 1997, Vol. 21> Issue(S1) : 455-456

Comment on “Proof of ‘Irreducibility Postulation’ and Its Applications”

Zhao Yumin ¹ ,
Chen Jinquan ²

1 Department of Physics, Southeast University, Nanjing, China;
2 Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
This comment points that the proof of the so-called "irreducibility postulation" is incorrect. The mistake lies in the fact that the symmetrization operator therein has no physical correspondence, and as a consequence, it provides nothing new or interesting in the concept of physics.
- irreducibility ,
- non-accidental degeneracy ,
- accidental degeneracy

[1]	Abdusalam Abdukerim , Wei Chen , Xun Chen , Yunhua Chen , Chen Cheng , Xiangyi Cui , Yingjie Fan , Deqing Fang , Changbo Fu , Mengting Fu , Lisheng Geng , Karl Giboni , Linhui Gu , Xuyuan Guo , Ke Han , Changda He , Di Huang , Yan Huang , Yanlin Huang , Zhou Huang , Xiangdong Ji , Yonglin Ju , Shuaijie Li , Huaxuan Liu , Jianglai Liu , Wenbo Ma , Yugang Ma , Yajun Mao , Yue Meng , Kaixiang Ni , Jinhua Ning , Xuyang Ning , Xiangxiang Ren , Changsong Shang , Lin Si , Guofang Shen , Andi Tan , Anqing Wang , Hongwei Wang , Meng Wang , Qiuhong Wang , Siguang Wang , Wei Wang , Xiuli Wang , Zhou Wang , Mengmeng Wu , Shiyong Wu , Weihao Wu , Jingkai Xia , Mengjiao Xiao , Pengwei Xie , Binbin Yan , Jijun Yang , Yong Yang , Chunxu Yu , Jumin Yuan , Ying Yuan , Xinning Zeng , Dan Zhang , Tao Zhang , Li Zhao , Qibin Zheng , Jifang Zhou , Ning Zhou , Xiaopeng Zhou , (PandaX-II Collaboration) . Study of background from accidental coincidence signalsin the PandaX-II experiment. Chinese Physics C, 2022, 46(10): 103001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac7cd8
[2]	M.V. Smirnov , Zhoujun Hu , Shuaijie Li , Jiajie Ling . Potential of octant degeneracy resolution in JUNO. Chinese Physics C, 2019, 43(3): 033001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/43/3/033001
[3]	YU Jing-Yi , WANG Zhe , CHEN Shao-Min . A precise calculation of delayed coincidence selection efficiency and accidental coincidence rate. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(5): 056201. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/5/056201
[4]	ZHANG Zhen-Hua , LÜ Gang , WEI Ke-Wei . Probing the mass degeneracy of particles with different spins. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(5): 053101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/5/053101
[5]	ZOU Peng-Cheng . Reply to 《Comment on “The Proof of Irreducibility Postulation and Its Applications”》. Chinese Physics C, 2001, 25(9): 937-939.
[6]	Zou Pengcheng , Huang Yongchang . Proof of “Irreducible Postulation” and Its Applications. Chinese Physics C, 1995, 19(S4): 375-378.

Access

Get Citation

Zhao Yumin and Chen Jinquan. Comment on “Proof of ‘Irreducibility Postulation’ and Its Applications”[J]. Chinese Physics C, 1997, 21(S1): 455-456.

Zhao Yumin and Chen Jinquan. Comment on “Proof of ‘Irreducibility Postulation’ and Its Applications”[J]. Chinese Physics C, 1997, 21(S1): 455-456. shu

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 1996-01-12

Article Metric

Article Views(482)
PDF Downloads(6)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Comment on “Proof of ‘Irreducibility Postulation’ and Its Applications”

Zhao Yumin ^1,
Chen Jinquan ^2,

1 Department of Physics, Southeast University, Nanjing, China;
2 Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

Received Date: 1996-01-12

Abstract: This comment points that the proof of the so-called "irreducibility postulation" is incorrect. The mistake lies in the fact that the symmetrization operator therein has no physical correspondence, and as a consequence, it provides nothing new or interesting in the concept of physics.