Processing math: 100%

Phase transition in modified thermodynamics of Kerr-AdS black holes

  • In this study, we investigate the critical phenomena of Kerr-AdS black holes under the modified first law of thermodynamics. Specifically, we considered modified black hole thermodynamics that exhibit a van der Waals-like phase structure. All critical exponents were calculated, and then, a swallowtail diagram of free energy was plotted. Comparing with existing results, the main difference is the correspondence between the thermal quantities of Kerr-AdS black holes and the van der Waals system. In a previous study [Y. D. Tsai, X. N. Wu, and Y. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 85 044005 (2012)], the correspondence was (ΩH,J)(V,P), while in our study, the correspondence was(J,ˆΩH)(V,P). This difference was owing to the rotating effect. The modified black hole thermodynamics were associated with rotating observers. The free energy in such a reference contains extra rotating energy, which induces a Legendre transformation in the (ˆΩH,J) cross-section, causing the difference in correspondence.
  • Since Bekenstein and Hawking [1, 2] demonstrated that black holes can be observed as thermodynamic objects with temperature, it is widely accepted that black hole thermodynamics has been an exciting and challenging field in theoretical physics. As fascinating phenomena in black hole thermodynamics, phase transitions and critical behaviors have attracted the attention of several researchers. Based on the analogy between black holes and thermodynamic objects, Hawking and Page proved the existence of a phase transition between the Schwarzschild-AdS black hole and thermal AdS space [3]. After their pioneering research, several studies were conducted in this direction, and rich phase structures were discovered [48]. The later-established AdS/CFT correspondence has further stimulated attention toward asymptotically anti-de Sitter (AdS) black holes [9, 10]. In different AdS black hole backgrounds, phase structures and critical phenomena have been studied and promoted [1119].

    Note that the energy definition of Kerr-AdS black holes is not unique. This is because the standard Komar energy expression diverges at infinity. Henneaux and Teitelboim [20] first derived the energy m/Ξ2, which satisfies the first law of black hole thermodynamics. The authors [21] proposed the energy m/Ξ3/2 by applying the Hamiltonian approach. Using the Iyer-Wald formalism, Gao et al. [22] clarified the origins of the two different energy definitions of Kerr-AdS black holes. They found the energies associated with different observers at infinity, and there is a relative rotation between the two types of observers. The associated thermodynamics for the different energies are also obtained in [22]. For non-rotating and rotating observers, the energies are m/Ξ2 andm/Ξ3/2, respectively. The energy m/Ξ2 corresponds to the standard thermodynamics of black hole, and its related critical phenomena have been studied, including phase transition and critical exponents [16]. The other energy m/Ξ3/2 is related to the modified first law of black hole thermodynamics [22]. Considering that the phase transition is associated with the degrees of freedom within the system, and there is only a relative rotation between two observers, it is reasonably conjectured that there should be similar phase structures in modified thermodynamics. In the current study, we investigate whether the phase transition structure exists under the modified first law of thermodynamics. Furthermore, the observer dependence of the phase structure is discussed.

    This paper is organized as follows. Section II briefly reviews the basic knowledge of the Kerr-AdS black hole. Section III discusses the modified first law and thermodynamic quantities. The main results are presented in Sections IV and V; the phase structure of the modified first law is shown. Discussions are given in the last section.

    The Kerr-AdS black hole solution of the Einstein equations in the Boyer-Lindquist coordinates is expressed as

    ds2=Δρ2(dtasin2θΞdϕ)2+ρ2Δdr2+ρ2Σdθ2+Ξsin2θρ2(adtr2+a2Ξdϕ)2,

    (1)

    with

    ρ2=r2+a2cos2θ,Ξ=1a2l2,Σ=1a2l2cos2θ,Δ=(r2+a2)(1+r2l2)2mr.

    (2)

    Here, Λ=3l2 is the cosmological constant, m,a are the mass parameter and angular momentum parameter, respectively. The associated thermodynamic quantities are [16]

    T=3r4++(a2+l2)r2+l2a24πl2r+(r2++a2),S=π(r2++a2)Ξ,ΩH=aΞr2++a2,

    (3)

    where r+ represents the horizon radius satisfying Δ(r+)=0; T, S, and ΩH are defined as the Hawking temperature, Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, and angular velocity, respectively. The energy M and angular momentum J are M=mΞ2 and J=amΞ2 , respectively.

    In 2012, S. Gunasekaran et al. [23] introduced the extended phase space for AdS black hole, where the cosmological constant Λ can be interpreted as a pressure term via the following relation:

    P=Λ8π.

    (4)

    The first law of black hole thermodynamics and the Smarr formula are

    δM=TδS+ΩHδJ+VδP,

    (5)

    M2=TS+ΩHJVP,

    (6)

    where the thermodynamic volume V is 4πl2r+(a2+r2+)3(a2+l2). Following Gunasekaran et al.'s perspective, several studies have focused on exploring the thermodynamic properties of AdS black holes on the extended phase space [2427].

    There is ambiguity on the energy notion of Kerr-AdS black holes [20, 21], which has been a long standing issue. In the recent article [22], the authors proposed a natural criteria to justify the notion of energy. In particular, they examined whether the associated first law of the black hole thermodynamics exists. Within the Iyer-Wald formalism, two versions of the first law and the Smarr formula were established for different energies. The difference originated from the choice of the Killing vectors. The standard energy notion m/Ξ2 is associated with the Killing vector T=t+13aΛϕ. The relevant thermodynamic quantities, first law, and standard results are presented in Section II. The other energy notion ˆM=m/Ξ3/2 is related to the Killing vector 1Ξt. By employing the notation from [22], the corresponding thermodynamic quantities can be expressed as

    ˆΩH=ΩHΞ,ˆT=TΞ,ˆV=VΞ.

    (7)

    The modified first law of black hole thermodynamics is presented as

    δˆM=ˆTδS+ˆΩHδJ+ˆVδP.

    (8)

    Based on the concrete expressions of the Killing vectors, there exists a relative rotation between two types of observers. Contrary to a naive observation, T coincides with the generator of the conformal boundary, corresponding to non-rotating observers, whereas rotating observers are related to t.

    Using Eq. (7), the functions ˆΩH, J, and ˆT can be expressed as

    J=3a(a2+r2+)(3+8Pπr2+)2(38a2Pπ)2r+,

    (9)

    ˆΩH=2aP(a2+38Pπ)2π3a2+r2+,

    (10)

    ˆT=1924a2Pπ[a2(3+8Pπr2+)+3(r2++8Pπr4+)]4πr+(a2+r2+).

    (11)

    The above equations can be viewed as equations of state of the Kerr-AdS black hole.

    In this section, we focus on the phase structure of modified black hole thermodynamics on the (ˆΩH,J) plane. A previous study [16] had considered similar problems for standard black hole thermodynamics on the (J,ΩH) section, without considering the extended phase space.

    According to the equations of state (9)−(11), the isotherms for various temperatures on the ˆΩHJ plane are presented in Fig. 1. Qualitatively, Fig. 1 is similar to the liquid/gas PVT diagram [28]. Under the following correspondence,

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  (color online) Isotherms of the Kerr-AdS black hole with l=1 in the ˆΩHJ plane. Qualitatively, the isotherms near the critical temperature ˆTc behave similar to a van der Waals system. The black solid line is the critical isotherm.

    ˆΩHP,JV,

    (12)

    there is a van der Waals-like phase structure. By contrast, the correspondence in the previous article [16] was JP,ΩHV.

    As the temperature decreases until ˆTc, an inflection point is formed. Therefore, the temperature ˆTc and angular velocity ˆΩH at the critical point satisfy [28]

    (ˆΩHJ)ˆTc=0,(2ˆΩHJ2)ˆTc=0.

    (13)

    Combining with the equations of state (9)−(11), the critical point is

    Jc=3(4+2)(1+22)3/25+42(6+52)448(3+2)2Pπ,

    (14)

    ˆΩHc=223(23+172)πP(2+32),

    (15)

    ˆTc=7(2+32)2P9π32π(1+22)3/2(6+52).

    (16)

    In this subsection, we first discuss the coexistence condition between two states, from which the law of equal area is obtained. For two stable states, ˆa and ˆb, it is well-known that the coexistence condition is represented by the free energy being equal [28], i.e., G(ˆa)=G(ˆb). Compared with the PTV system, the free energy for the black hole system should be

    dG=SdˆT+JdˆΩH.

    (17)

    Fixing the temperature, one can obtain the free energy by integrating the above equation along the isothermal curve. The difference in free energy between two states should be ˆbˆaJdˆΩH (this integral is along the isothermal curve that connects the two states). From Fig. 2(a), because ˆa and ˆb are coexistent states,

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (color online) (a) The brown solid line represents an isotherm with temperature ˆT=0.248291 and l=1; ˆa and ˆb are coexistence states. Because of the equal free energy requirement of coexistence states, i.e., G(ˆa)=G(ˆb), area(A) = area(B). (b) The red dashed line is the coexistence curve of phase transition above ˆTc. The black solid line represents the critical isotherm with l=1.

    G(ˆa)G(ˆb)=ˆΩHˆbˆΩHˆaJdˆΩH=0,

    (18)

    implying that the areas of region A and region B in Fig. 2(a) are equal, corresponding to the Maxwell equal area law.

    To investigate the critical behavior near the critical point, we should define the order parameter. Analogous to the van der Waals system, η=JbJa2 is defined as the order parameter. The coexistence curve is the red dashed line in Fig. 2(b).

    For a van der Waals system, near the critical point, one can obtain the critical exponents [28]. For the correspondence (12), the analogous critical exponents can be obtained as follows.

    Degree of critical isotherm:

    ˆΩHˆΩHc=Aδ|JJc|δsign(JJc),ˆT=ˆTc.

    (19)

    Degree of coexistence curve:

    η=Aβ(ˆTˆTc)β,ˆT>ˆTc.

    (20)

    Degree of heat capacity(J=Jc):

    CJ={Aα{(ˆTˆTc)}α,ˆT<ˆTcAα{+(ˆTˆTc)}α,ˆT>ˆTc.

    (21)

    Degree of isothermal compressibility:

    κT=1J(JˆΩH)ˆT={Aγ{(ˆTˆTc)}γ,ˆT<ˆTcAγ{+(ˆTˆTc)}γ,ˆT>ˆTc.

    (22)

    In the following subseciton, we calculate explicitly the critical exponents for modified black hole thermodynamics.

    1   Degree of critical isotherm

    At the critical point, the first and second derivatives of ˆΩH with respect to J satisfy

    (ˆΩHJ)ˆTc=0,(2ˆΩHJ2)ˆTc=0.

    (23)

    The third derivative can be calculated as

    (3ˆΩHJ3)ˆTc=16384(πP)7/29872+1230,

    (24)

    hence, δ=3 according to the definition of δ in Eq. (19).

    2   Degree of coexistence curve

    In Fig. 2(b), we plot the curve of the coexisting states using Maxwell's equal-area law. Along this curve, all thermodynamical quantities depend only on temperature. To find the value of the degree of the coexistence curve, β, we should obtain the relations between η and ˆT near the critical point. Therefore, we expand ˆΩH in terms of J and ˆT to the third order as

    ˆΩHˆΩHc(ˆTˆΩH)J|c(ˆTˆTc)+12(2ˆTˆΩH)J|c(ˆTˆTc)2+(ˆT(JˆΩH)ˆT)J|c(ˆTˆTc)(JJc)+16(3ˆTˆΩH)J|c(ˆTˆTc)3+16(3JˆΩH)ˆT|c(JJc)3+12(2ˆT(JˆΩH)ˆT)J|c(ˆTˆTc)2(JJc)+12(ˆT(2JˆΩH)ˆT)J|c(ˆTˆTc)(JJc)2.

    (25)

    For simplicity, let us introduce

    ω=ˆΩHˆΩHc,¯t=ˆTˆTc,j=JJc,

    (26)

    then, Eq. (25) becomes

    ω=c10¯t+c20¯t2+c11¯tj+c30¯t3+c03j3+c21¯t2j+c12¯tj2.

    (27)

    According to the equations of state (9)−(11), one can calculate all coefficients in Eq. (27) as

    c10=2π,c20=6(29241)π3/21P,c11=643(21)π2P, c30=9(11215)π2P,c03=16384(πP)7/29872+123,c21=5442P53312+7539π5/2,c12=20483(432)π3P2.

    (28)

    The equilibrium condition ˆΩa=ˆΩb implies ω(ja,t)=ω(jb,t), which in turn yields

    ωbωa=(jbja)[c11¯t+c21¯t2+c12¯t(ja+jb)+c03(j2a+jajb+j2b)]=0.

    (29)

    By employing Maxwell's equal area law, the area of the shaded region in Fig. 3 is equal to the area of the rectangle cdˆbˆa in Fig. 3. Therefore, we obtain

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  (color online) According to the equal area law, i.e., area(A) = area(B), the area of the shaded region should be equal to the area of the rectangle cdˆbˆa.

    JbJaˆΩdJ=(JbJa)12(Ωb+Ωa),

    (30)

    The left side of Eq. (30) represents the area of the shaded region in Fig. 3 , and the right side represents the area of the rectangle cdba in Fig. 3. The factor 12(Ωb+Ωa) originates from the equilibrium condition ˆΩa=ˆΩb.) By using Eq. (26), Eq. (30) becomes

    JbJaˆΩdJ=[JbJa(ˆΩˆΩc)d(JJc)]+ˆΩc[(JbJc)(JaJc)]=[jbja(ˆΩˆΩc)dj]+ˆΩc(jbja)=[jbjaωdj]+ˆΩc(jbja)=(JbJa)12(ˆΩb+ˆΩa)=(jbja)12([ˆΩbˆΩc]+[ˆΩaˆΩc])+(jbja)ˆΩc=(jbja)12(ωb+ωa)+(jbja)ˆΩc.

    (31)

    The above result implies that

    jbjaωdj=(jbja)12(ωb+ωa).

    (32)

    Substituting Eq. (27) into Eq. (32), one can obtain

    jbja(c10¯t+c20¯t2+c11¯tj+c30¯t3+c03j3+c21¯t2j+c12¯tj2)dj=c10¯t(jbja)+c20¯t2(jbja)+12c11¯t(j2bj2a)+c30¯t3(jbja)+14c03(jb+ja)(j2b+j2a)+12c21¯t2(jb+ja)+13c12¯t(j2b+jajb+j2a)]=(jbja)12(ωa+ωb),

    (33)

    dividing both sides of Eq. (33) by (jbja) yields

    c10¯t+c20¯t2+12c11¯t(jb+ja)+c30¯t3+14c03(jb+ja)(j2b+j2a)+12c21¯t2(jb+ja)+13c12¯t(j2b+jajb+j2a)=c10¯t+c20¯t2+12c11¯t(jb+ja)+c30¯t3+12c03(j3b+j3a)+12c21¯t2(jb+ja)+12c12¯t(j2b+j2a).

    (34)

    Eliminating similar terms on both sides of Eq. (34) yields

    14c03(jb+ja)(j2b+j2a)+13c12¯t(j2b+jajb+j2a)=12c03(j3b+j3a)+12c12¯t(j2b+j2a).

    (35)

    Then, we can obtain

    14c03(j3b+j2bja+jbj2a+j3a)+13c12¯t(j2b+jajb+j2a)=12c03(j3b+j3a)+12c12¯t(j2b+j2a),

    (36)

    which implies

    0=14c03(j3ajaj2bj2ajb+j3b)+16c12¯t(j2b2jajb+j2a)=14c03(jb+ja)(jbja)2+16c12¯t(jbja)2.

    (37)

    By simplifying the above equation, we can obtain

    (jbja)2[14c03(ja+jb)+16c12¯t]=0.

    (38)

    Denoting jjbja=JbJa,j+jb+ja and considering Eq. (38), j+ can be solved as

    j+=2c12¯t3c03,

    (39)

    Substituting Eq. (39) into Eq. (29) yields

    j=4c11¯t+(4c2123c034c21)¯t2c03.

    (40)

    Near the critical point, the temperature dependence of the order parameter is

    JbJa2Aβ(ˆTˆTc)1/2.

    (41)

    Thus, β=12.

    3   Critical exponent of heat capacity

    According to definition (21), the critical exponent of heat capacity can be obtained as follows. Recall that the energy ˆM is expressed by

    ˆM=(a2+r2+)(r2+l2+1)2r+(1a2l2)3/2,

    (42)

    then, the heat capacity CJ can be calculated as

    CJ=(ˆMˆT)J|c=38P0.

    (43)

    Since the heat capacity neither diverges nor vanishes, α and α are both zero, i.e., α=α=0.

    4   Degree of isothermal compressibility

    The isothermal comprssibility κT is defined as

    κT=1J(JˆΩH)ˆT,

    (44)

    which diverges at the critical point. ˜ω,˜t , and ˜j are introduced as

    ˜ω=ˆΩHˆΩHcˆΩHc,˜t=ˆTˆTcˆTc,˜j=JJcJc,

    (45)

    which yields

    ˆΩH=ˆΩHc˜ω+ˆΩHc,ˆT=ˆTc˜t+ˆTc,J=Jc˜j+Jc,

    (46)

    and

    ω=ˆΩHc˜ω,¯t=ˆTc˜t,j=Jc˜j.

    (47)

    Eq. (27) can be rewritten as

    ˜ω=~c10˜t+~c20˜t2+~c11˜t˜j+~c30˜t3+~c03˜j3+~c21˜t2˜j+~c12˜t˜j2.

    (48)

    Using Eq. (44), we obtain

    1JκT=1(JˆΩH)ˆT=(ˆΩHJ)ˆT.

    (49)

    Combining Eqs. (41), (46), (47), and (48) yields

    1JκT=(ˆΩHJ)ˆT=(ˆΩH˜j˜jJ)ˆT=ˆΩHcJc(˜ω˜j)˜t(ωj)¯t,

    (50)

    namely

    κT1(ωj)¯t=c11¯t+3c03j2+o(¯t)=C1¯t+o(¯t),

    (51)

    where C1 is a real constant; Eq. (41) is used in the last step. Based on the definition of γ and γ in Eq. (22), we obtain γ=γ=1.

    1   Free energy

    According to the differential expression dG=SdˆT+JdˆΩH, at constant angular velocity ˆΩH, we can employ Eqs. (3), (10), and (11) to plot the GˆT diagram.

    From Fig. 4, the swallowtail structure is analogous to the van der Waals system. This further confirms the similarity between the modified thermodynamics and the PVT system.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  (color online) Qualitative behavior of free energy as a function of temperature for various angular velocities with l=1. The angular velocity decreases from bottom to top. The green solid line corresponds to ˆΩH>ˆΩHc, the yellow solid line represents ˆΩH=ˆΩHc, and the remaining red solid lines correspond to ˆΩH<ˆΩHc. For ˆΩH<ˆΩHc, the existence of the swallowtail structure implies that a first-order phase transition occurs in the system.
    2   Widom scaling law

    It is well-known that, in the vicinity of the critical point, the free energy can be expressed as a homogenous function, with corresponding homogenous indices p and q [28]. Based on the previous discussions, we observe that the critical exponents satisfy the following expected relations:

    α+2β+γ=2,α+β(γ+1)=2,

    (52)

    γ(δ+1)=(2α)(δ1),γ=β(δ1).

    (53)

    The free energy has the following scaling symmetry

    gs(Λpϵ,Λqj)=Λgs(ϵ,j),p=12,q=34.

    (54)

    In terms of p and q [28], the critical exponets read

    α=2p1q,

    (55)

    β=1qp,

    (56)

    γ=2q1p,

    (57)

    δ=q1q.

    (58)

    The above scaling relations can be considered as consistency checks for the critical exponents we obtained in this section.

    In standard black hole thermodynamics, the phase structure on the (P,V) section has been investigated [1719, 23, 29]. In this section, we study the phase structures on the (P, ˆV) section in modified black hole thermodynamics. In Fig. 5, we plot the PˆV diagram corresponding to the Kerr-AdS black hole.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  (color online) P-ˆV diagram of the Kerr-AdS black hole with J=1. The brown solid line is the critical isotherm, and the red dot is the critical point.

    Following the method used in [29], after neglecting all higher order terms of J, the equation of state can be written as

    P=3π6ˆT3ˆV12 62/33πˆV2/3+2πJ2(436π2/3ˆT3ˆV+3)3(36π2/3ˆTˆV4/3+ˆV)2,

    (59)

    where ˆV satisfies

    ˆV=4πr3+3+48π(4πPr2++1)J2r+(8πPr2++3)2.

    (60)

    Following the critical point condition PˆV|TC=0,2PˆV2|TC=0, we can obtain

    Pc=0.003J,ˆVc=129.603J3/2,ˆTc=0.041J.

    (61)

    Consider the phase transition that occurs below the critical temperature ˆTc. In Fig. 5, a van der Waals-like phase structure can be observed. The behavior of physical variables near the critical point is quantitatively described by the critical exponents. Following a similar method as in Section IV, we obtain

    α=α=0,β=12,γ=1,δ=3.

    (62)

    The above results show that the phase structure for the modified black hole thermodynamics in the (P,ˆV) section is almost the same as the standard one [30, 31]; the only difference is that all thermal quantities have a deformation factor 1Ξ, which is shown in Eq. (7).

    In Kerr-AdS spacetime, there exist two sets of the first law of thermodynamics because of different choices of observers at infinity. In particular, we investigated the critical phenomena of black hole thermodynamics associated with rotating observers. Based on the modified first law and mass formula, we obtained the phase structures in the extended phase space for both the (ˆΩH,J) cross-section and (P,ˆV) cross-section. In comparison with previous results [16], the phase structure within the (ˆΩH,J) plane remained analogous to the van der Waals-like phase structure. However, the difference was in the correspondence of thermodynamic quantities. According to a previous study [16], the correspondence is JP, ΩHV, but in our case, it is ˆΩHP,JV. The aforementioned changes result from differences in observers. Compared to non-rotating observers, the energy measured by rotating observers includes a rotational kinetic energy part ˆΩHJ. This variation is equivalent to performing a Legendre transformation in the extended phase space with respect to the conjugate coordinates J and ˆΩH; thus, the thermodynamic quantities correspond differently. Additionally, we discussed the phase structures on the (P,ˆV) plane in modified thermodynamics. We found that the obtained results closely resemble those in standard thermodynamics.

    The authors thank Xiaokai He and Naqing Xie for their useful advice. The authors also thank the referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. These opinions have greatly enhanced the quality of this paper.

    [1] J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333
    [2] S.W. Hawking, Commum.Math.Phys. 43, 199 (1975) doi: 10.1007/BF02345020
    [3] S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, Commun. Math. Phys. 87, 577 (1983) doi: 10.1007/BF01208266
    [4] G. Arcioni and E. Lozano-Tellechea, Phys.Rev, D 72, 104021 (2005) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.104021
    [5] R. G. Cai, L. M. Cao, and Y. W. Sun, JHEP 11, 039 (2007) doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/039
    [6] R. G. Cai, Z. J. Lu, and Y. Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 55, 853 (1997) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.853
    [7] S. Carlip and S. Vaidya, Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 3827 (2003) doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/20/16/319
    [8] C. O. Lousto, Phys. Rev. D 51, 1733 (1995) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1733
    [9] E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998) doi: 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2
    [10] A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson et al., Phys. Rev. D 60, 104026 (1999) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.104026
    [11] R. Banerjee, S. K. Modak, and S. Samanta, Phys. Rev. D 84, 064024 (2011) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.064024
    [12] M. M. Caldarelli, G. Cognola, and D. Klemm, Class. Quant. Grav. 17, 399 (2000) doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/17/2/310
    [13] M. Natsuume, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 186, 491 (2010) doi: 10.1143/PTPS.186.491
    [14] X. N. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 62, 124023 (2000) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.124023
    [15] A. Sahay, T. Sarkar, and G. Sengupta, JHEP 04, 118 (2010) doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2010)118
    [16] Y.-D. Tsai, X.-N. Wu, and Y. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 85, 044005 (2012) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.044005
    [17] S.-W Wei and Y.-X Liu, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084015 (2016) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.084015
    [18] P. Cheng, S.-W Wei, and Y.-X Liu, Phys. Rev. D 94, 024025 (2016) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.024025
    [19] J. X. Mo and W. B. Liu, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2836 (2014) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2836-0
    [20] M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Commun. Math. Phys. 98, 391 (2012) doi: 10.1007/BF01205790
    [21] P. T. Chruściel, J. Jezierski, and J. Kijowski, Phys. Rev. D 92, 084030 (2015) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.084030
    [22] Y. j. Gao, Z. b. Di, and S. j. Gao, General mass formulas for charged Kerr-AdS black holes, (2023), arXiv: gr-qc/2304.10290
    [23] S. Gunasekaran, D. Kubizňák, and R. B. Mann, JHEP 11, 110 (2012) doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2012)110
    [24] R. Zhao, H. H. Zhao, S. Ma et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2645 (2013) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2645-x
    [25] S. W Wei and Y. X Liu, Phys. Rev. D 87, 044014 (2013) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.044014
    [26] H. Xu, W. Xu and L. Zhao, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3074 (2014) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3074-1
    [27] G. G. Luciano and E. N. Saridakis, JHEP 12, 114 (2023) doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2023)114
    [28] R. E. Reichl, A Modern Course in Statistical Physics, (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, 1980)
    [29] D. Kubizňák and R. B. Mann, Phys. Rev. D 84, 024037 (2012) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.024037
    [30] J. X. Zhao, M. S. Ma, L. C. Zhang et al., Astrophys. Space Sci. 352, 763 (2014) doi: 10.1007/s10509-014-1989-5
    [31] B. Tang, Chin. Phys.C 45, 055101 (2021) doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abe369
  • [1] J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333
    [2] S.W. Hawking, Commum.Math.Phys. 43, 199 (1975) doi: 10.1007/BF02345020
    [3] S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, Commun. Math. Phys. 87, 577 (1983) doi: 10.1007/BF01208266
    [4] G. Arcioni and E. Lozano-Tellechea, Phys.Rev, D 72, 104021 (2005) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.104021
    [5] R. G. Cai, L. M. Cao, and Y. W. Sun, JHEP 11, 039 (2007) doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/039
    [6] R. G. Cai, Z. J. Lu, and Y. Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 55, 853 (1997) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.853
    [7] S. Carlip and S. Vaidya, Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 3827 (2003) doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/20/16/319
    [8] C. O. Lousto, Phys. Rev. D 51, 1733 (1995) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1733
    [9] E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998) doi: 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2
    [10] A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson et al., Phys. Rev. D 60, 104026 (1999) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.104026
    [11] R. Banerjee, S. K. Modak, and S. Samanta, Phys. Rev. D 84, 064024 (2011) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.064024
    [12] M. M. Caldarelli, G. Cognola, and D. Klemm, Class. Quant. Grav. 17, 399 (2000) doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/17/2/310
    [13] M. Natsuume, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 186, 491 (2010) doi: 10.1143/PTPS.186.491
    [14] X. N. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 62, 124023 (2000) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.124023
    [15] A. Sahay, T. Sarkar, and G. Sengupta, JHEP 04, 118 (2010) doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2010)118
    [16] Y.-D. Tsai, X.-N. Wu, and Y. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 85, 044005 (2012) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.044005
    [17] S.-W Wei and Y.-X Liu, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084015 (2016) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.084015
    [18] P. Cheng, S.-W Wei, and Y.-X Liu, Phys. Rev. D 94, 024025 (2016) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.024025
    [19] J. X. Mo and W. B. Liu, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2836 (2014) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2836-0
    [20] M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Commun. Math. Phys. 98, 391 (2012) doi: 10.1007/BF01205790
    [21] P. T. Chruściel, J. Jezierski, and J. Kijowski, Phys. Rev. D 92, 084030 (2015) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.084030
    [22] Y. j. Gao, Z. b. Di, and S. j. Gao, General mass formulas for charged Kerr-AdS black holes, (2023), arXiv: gr-qc/2304.10290
    [23] S. Gunasekaran, D. Kubizňák, and R. B. Mann, JHEP 11, 110 (2012) doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2012)110
    [24] R. Zhao, H. H. Zhao, S. Ma et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2645 (2013) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2645-x
    [25] S. W Wei and Y. X Liu, Phys. Rev. D 87, 044014 (2013) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.044014
    [26] H. Xu, W. Xu and L. Zhao, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3074 (2014) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3074-1
    [27] G. G. Luciano and E. N. Saridakis, JHEP 12, 114 (2023) doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2023)114
    [28] R. E. Reichl, A Modern Course in Statistical Physics, (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, 1980)
    [29] D. Kubizňák and R. B. Mann, Phys. Rev. D 84, 024037 (2012) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.024037
    [30] J. X. Zhao, M. S. Ma, L. C. Zhang et al., Astrophys. Space Sci. 352, 763 (2014) doi: 10.1007/s10509-014-1989-5
    [31] B. Tang, Chin. Phys.C 45, 055101 (2021) doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abe369
  • 加载中

Figures(5)

Get Citation
Qin Liu, Xiaoning Wu and Xiao Zhang. Phase transition of modified thermodynamics of the Kerr-AdS black hole[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad8a3a
Qin Liu, Xiaoning Wu and Xiao Zhang. Phase transition of modified thermodynamics of the Kerr-AdS black hole[J]. Chinese Physics C.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad8a3a shu
Milestone
Received: 2024-09-09
Article Metric

Article Views(951)
PDF Downloads(23)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Phase transition in modified thermodynamics of Kerr-AdS black holes

    Corresponding author: Qin Liu, qliu@st.gxu.edu.cn
    Corresponding author: Xiaoning Wu, wuxn@amss.ac.cn
    Corresponding author: Xiao Zhang, xzhang@amss.ac.cn
  • 1. School of Physical Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
  • 2. Guangxi Center for Mathematical Research, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
  • 3. Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science and Hua Loo-Keng Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • 4. School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Abstract: In this study, we investigate the critical phenomena of Kerr-AdS black holes under the modified first law of thermodynamics. Specifically, we considered modified black hole thermodynamics that exhibit a van der Waals-like phase structure. All critical exponents were calculated, and then, a swallowtail diagram of free energy was plotted. Comparing with existing results, the main difference is the correspondence between the thermal quantities of Kerr-AdS black holes and the van der Waals system. In a previous study [Y. D. Tsai, X. N. Wu, and Y. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 85 044005 (2012)], the correspondence was (ΩH,J)(V,P), while in our study, the correspondence was(J,ˆΩH)(V,P). This difference was owing to the rotating effect. The modified black hole thermodynamics were associated with rotating observers. The free energy in such a reference contains extra rotating energy, which induces a Legendre transformation in the (ˆΩH,J) cross-section, causing the difference in correspondence.

    HTML

    I.   INTRODUCTION
    • Since Bekenstein and Hawking [1, 2] demonstrated that black holes can be observed as thermodynamic objects with temperature, it is widely accepted that black hole thermodynamics has been an exciting and challenging field in theoretical physics. As fascinating phenomena in black hole thermodynamics, phase transitions and critical behaviors have attracted the attention of several researchers. Based on the analogy between black holes and thermodynamic objects, Hawking and Page proved the existence of a phase transition between the Schwarzschild-AdS black hole and thermal AdS space [3]. After their pioneering research, several studies were conducted in this direction, and rich phase structures were discovered [48]. The later-established AdS/CFT correspondence has further stimulated attention toward asymptotically anti-de Sitter (AdS) black holes [9, 10]. In different AdS black hole backgrounds, phase structures and critical phenomena have been studied and promoted [1119].

      Note that the energy definition of Kerr-AdS black holes is not unique. This is because the standard Komar energy expression diverges at infinity. Henneaux and Teitelboim [20] first derived the energy m/Ξ2, which satisfies the first law of black hole thermodynamics. The authors [21] proposed the energy m/Ξ3/2 by applying the Hamiltonian approach. Using the Iyer-Wald formalism, Gao et al. [22] clarified the origins of the two different energy definitions of Kerr-AdS black holes. They found the energies associated with different observers at infinity, and there is a relative rotation between the two types of observers. The associated thermodynamics for the different energies are also obtained in [22]. For non-rotating and rotating observers, the energies are m/Ξ2 andm/Ξ3/2, respectively. The energy m/Ξ2 corresponds to the standard thermodynamics of black hole, and its related critical phenomena have been studied, including phase transition and critical exponents [16]. The other energy m/Ξ3/2 is related to the modified first law of black hole thermodynamics [22]. Considering that the phase transition is associated with the degrees of freedom within the system, and there is only a relative rotation between two observers, it is reasonably conjectured that there should be similar phase structures in modified thermodynamics. In the current study, we investigate whether the phase transition structure exists under the modified first law of thermodynamics. Furthermore, the observer dependence of the phase structure is discussed.

      This paper is organized as follows. Section II briefly reviews the basic knowledge of the Kerr-AdS black hole. Section III discusses the modified first law and thermodynamic quantities. The main results are presented in Sections IV and V; the phase structure of the modified first law is shown. Discussions are given in the last section.

    II.   KERR-ADS BLACK HOLE THERMODYNAMICS
    • The Kerr-AdS black hole solution of the Einstein equations in the Boyer-Lindquist coordinates is expressed as

      ds2=Δρ2(dtasin2θΞdϕ)2+ρ2Δdr2+ρ2Σdθ2+Ξsin2θρ2(adtr2+a2Ξdϕ)2,

      (1)

      with

      ρ2=r2+a2cos2θ,Ξ=1a2l2,Σ=1a2l2cos2θ,Δ=(r2+a2)(1+r2l2)2mr.

      (2)

      Here, Λ=3l2 is the cosmological constant, m,a are the mass parameter and angular momentum parameter, respectively. The associated thermodynamic quantities are [16]

      T=3r4++(a2+l2)r2+l2a24πl2r+(r2++a2),S=π(r2++a2)Ξ,ΩH=aΞr2++a2,

      (3)

      where r+ represents the horizon radius satisfying Δ(r+)=0; T, S, and ΩH are defined as the Hawking temperature, Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, and angular velocity, respectively. The energy M and angular momentum J are M=mΞ2 and J=amΞ2 , respectively.

      In 2012, S. Gunasekaran et al. [23] introduced the extended phase space for AdS black hole, where the cosmological constant Λ can be interpreted as a pressure term via the following relation:

      P=Λ8π.

      (4)

      The first law of black hole thermodynamics and the Smarr formula are

      δM=TδS+ΩHδJ+VδP,

      (5)

      M2=TS+ΩHJVP,

      (6)

      where the thermodynamic volume V is 4πl2r+(a2+r2+)3(a2+l2). Following Gunasekaran et al.'s perspective, several studies have focused on exploring the thermodynamic properties of AdS black holes on the extended phase space [2427].

    III.   MODIFIED BLACK HOLE THERMODYNAMICS
    • There is ambiguity on the energy notion of Kerr-AdS black holes [20, 21], which has been a long standing issue. In the recent article [22], the authors proposed a natural criteria to justify the notion of energy. In particular, they examined whether the associated first law of the black hole thermodynamics exists. Within the Iyer-Wald formalism, two versions of the first law and the Smarr formula were established for different energies. The difference originated from the choice of the Killing vectors. The standard energy notion m/Ξ2 is associated with the Killing vector T=t+13aΛϕ. The relevant thermodynamic quantities, first law, and standard results are presented in Section II. The other energy notion ˆM=m/Ξ3/2 is related to the Killing vector 1Ξt. By employing the notation from [22], the corresponding thermodynamic quantities can be expressed as

      ˆΩH=ΩHΞ,ˆT=TΞ,ˆV=VΞ.

      (7)

      The modified first law of black hole thermodynamics is presented as

      δˆM=ˆTδS+ˆΩHδJ+ˆVδP.

      (8)

      Based on the concrete expressions of the Killing vectors, there exists a relative rotation between two types of observers. Contrary to a naive observation, T coincides with the generator of the conformal boundary, corresponding to non-rotating observers, whereas rotating observers are related to t.

    IV.   PHASE STRUCTURE ON (ˆΩH, J) SECTION
    • Using Eq. (7), the functions ˆΩH, J, and ˆT can be expressed as

      J=3a(a2+r2+)(3+8Pπr2+)2(38a2Pπ)2r+,

      (9)

      ˆΩH=2aP(a2+38Pπ)2π3a2+r2+,

      (10)

      ˆT=1924a2Pπ[a2(3+8Pπr2+)+3(r2++8Pπr4+)]4πr+(a2+r2+).

      (11)

      The above equations can be viewed as equations of state of the Kerr-AdS black hole.

      In this section, we focus on the phase structure of modified black hole thermodynamics on the (ˆΩH,J) plane. A previous study [16] had considered similar problems for standard black hole thermodynamics on the (J,ΩH) section, without considering the extended phase space.

      According to the equations of state (9)−(11), the isotherms for various temperatures on the ˆΩHJ plane are presented in Fig. 1. Qualitatively, Fig. 1 is similar to the liquid/gas PVT diagram [28]. Under the following correspondence,

      Figure 1.  (color online) Isotherms of the Kerr-AdS black hole with l=1 in the ˆΩHJ plane. Qualitatively, the isotherms near the critical temperature ˆTc behave similar to a van der Waals system. The black solid line is the critical isotherm.

      ˆΩHP,JV,

      (12)

      there is a van der Waals-like phase structure. By contrast, the correspondence in the previous article [16] was JP,ΩHV.

      As the temperature decreases until ˆTc, an inflection point is formed. Therefore, the temperature ˆTc and angular velocity ˆΩH at the critical point satisfy [28]

      (ˆΩHJ)ˆTc=0,(2ˆΩHJ2)ˆTc=0.

      (13)

      Combining with the equations of state (9)−(11), the critical point is

      Jc=3(4+2)(1+22)3/25+42(6+52)448(3+2)2Pπ,

      (14)

      ˆΩHc=223(23+172)πP(2+32),

      (15)

      ˆTc=7(2+32)2P9π32π(1+22)3/2(6+52).

      (16)
    • A.   Law of equal area and order parameter

    • In this subsection, we first discuss the coexistence condition between two states, from which the law of equal area is obtained. For two stable states, ˆa and ˆb, it is well-known that the coexistence condition is represented by the free energy being equal [28], i.e., G(ˆa)=G(ˆb). Compared with the PTV system, the free energy for the black hole system should be

      dG=SdˆT+JdˆΩH.

      (17)

      Fixing the temperature, one can obtain the free energy by integrating the above equation along the isothermal curve. The difference in free energy between two states should be ˆbˆaJdˆΩH (this integral is along the isothermal curve that connects the two states). From Fig. 2(a), because ˆa and ˆb are coexistent states,

      Figure 2.  (color online) (a) The brown solid line represents an isotherm with temperature ˆT=0.248291 and l=1; ˆa and ˆb are coexistence states. Because of the equal free energy requirement of coexistence states, i.e., G(ˆa)=G(ˆb), area(A) = area(B). (b) The red dashed line is the coexistence curve of phase transition above ˆTc. The black solid line represents the critical isotherm with l=1.

      G(ˆa)G(ˆb)=ˆΩHˆbˆΩHˆaJdˆΩH=0,

      (18)

      implying that the areas of region A and region B in Fig. 2(a) are equal, corresponding to the Maxwell equal area law.

      To investigate the critical behavior near the critical point, we should define the order parameter. Analogous to the van der Waals system, η=JbJa2 is defined as the order parameter. The coexistence curve is the red dashed line in Fig. 2(b).

    • B.   Critical exponents

    • For a van der Waals system, near the critical point, one can obtain the critical exponents [28]. For the correspondence (12), the analogous critical exponents can be obtained as follows.

      Degree of critical isotherm:

      ˆΩHˆΩHc=Aδ|JJc|δsign(JJc),ˆT=ˆTc.

      (19)

      Degree of coexistence curve:

      η=Aβ(ˆTˆTc)β,ˆT>ˆTc.

      (20)

      Degree of heat capacity(J=Jc):

      CJ={Aα{(ˆTˆTc)}α,ˆT<ˆTcAα{+(ˆTˆTc)}α,ˆT>ˆTc.

      (21)

      Degree of isothermal compressibility:

      κT=1J(JˆΩH)ˆT={Aγ{(ˆTˆTc)}γ,ˆT<ˆTcAγ{+(ˆTˆTc)}γ,ˆT>ˆTc.

      (22)

      In the following subseciton, we calculate explicitly the critical exponents for modified black hole thermodynamics.

    • 1.   Degree of critical isotherm
    • At the critical point, the first and second derivatives of ˆΩH with respect to J satisfy

      (ˆΩHJ)ˆTc=0,(2ˆΩHJ2)ˆTc=0.

      (23)

      The third derivative can be calculated as

      (3ˆΩHJ3)ˆTc=16384(πP)7/29872+1230,

      (24)

      hence, δ=3 according to the definition of δ in Eq. (19).

    • 2.   Degree of coexistence curve
    • In Fig. 2(b), we plot the curve of the coexisting states using Maxwell's equal-area law. Along this curve, all thermodynamical quantities depend only on temperature. To find the value of the degree of the coexistence curve, β, we should obtain the relations between η and ˆT near the critical point. Therefore, we expand ˆΩH in terms of J and ˆT to the third order as

      ˆΩHˆΩHc(ˆTˆΩH)J|c(ˆTˆTc)+12(2ˆTˆΩH)J|c(ˆTˆTc)2+(ˆT(JˆΩH)ˆT)J|c(ˆTˆTc)(JJc)+16(3ˆTˆΩH)J|c(ˆTˆTc)3+16(3JˆΩH)ˆT|c(JJc)3+12(2ˆT(JˆΩH)ˆT)J|c(ˆTˆTc)2(JJc)+12(ˆT(2JˆΩH)ˆT)J|c(ˆTˆTc)(JJc)2.

      (25)

      For simplicity, let us introduce

      ω=ˆΩHˆΩHc,¯t=ˆTˆTc,j=JJc,

      (26)

      then, Eq. (25) becomes

      ω=c10¯t+c20¯t2+c11¯tj+c30¯t3+c03j3+c21¯t2j+c12¯tj2.

      (27)

      According to the equations of state (9)−(11), one can calculate all coefficients in Eq. (27) as

      c10=2π,c20=6(29241)π3/21P,c11=643(21)π2P, c30=9(11215)π2P,c03=16384(πP)7/29872+123,c21=5442P53312+7539π5/2,c12=20483(432)π3P2.

      (28)

      The equilibrium condition ˆΩa=ˆΩb implies ω(ja,t)=ω(jb,t), which in turn yields

      ωbωa=(jbja)[c11¯t+c21¯t2+c12¯t(ja+jb)+c03(j2a+jajb+j2b)]=0.

      (29)

      By employing Maxwell's equal area law, the area of the shaded region in Fig. 3 is equal to the area of the rectangle cdˆbˆa in Fig. 3. Therefore, we obtain

      Figure 3.  (color online) According to the equal area law, i.e., area(A) = area(B), the area of the shaded region should be equal to the area of the rectangle cdˆbˆa.

      JbJaˆΩdJ=(JbJa)12(Ωb+Ωa),

      (30)

      The left side of Eq. (30) represents the area of the shaded region in Fig. 3 , and the right side represents the area of the rectangle cdba in Fig. 3. The factor 12(Ωb+Ωa) originates from the equilibrium condition ˆΩa=ˆΩb.) By using Eq. (26), Eq. (30) becomes

      JbJaˆΩdJ=[JbJa(ˆΩˆΩc)d(JJc)]+ˆΩc[(JbJc)(JaJc)]=[jbja(ˆΩˆΩc)dj]+ˆΩc(jbja)=[jbjaωdj]+ˆΩc(jbja)=(JbJa)12(ˆΩb+ˆΩa)=(jbja)12([ˆΩbˆΩc]+[ˆΩaˆΩc])+(jbja)ˆΩc=(jbja)12(ωb+ωa)+(jbja)ˆΩc.

      (31)

      The above result implies that

      jbjaωdj=(jbja)12(ωb+ωa).

      (32)

      Substituting Eq. (27) into Eq. (32), one can obtain

      jbja(c10¯t+c20¯t2+c11¯tj+c30¯t3+c03j3+c21¯t2j+c12¯tj2)dj=c10¯t(jbja)+c20¯t2(jbja)+12c11¯t(j2bj2a)+c30¯t3(jbja)+14c03(jb+ja)(j2b+j2a)+12c21¯t2(jb+ja)+13c12¯t(j2b+jajb+j2a)]=(jbja)12(ωa+ωb),

      (33)

      dividing both sides of Eq. (33) by (jbja) yields

      c10¯t+c20¯t2+12c11¯t(jb+ja)+c30¯t3+14c03(jb+ja)(j2b+j2a)+12c21¯t2(jb+ja)+13c12¯t(j2b+jajb+j2a)=c10¯t+c20¯t2+12c11¯t(jb+ja)+c30¯t3+12c03(j3b+j3a)+12c21¯t2(jb+ja)+12c12¯t(j2b+j2a).

      (34)

      Eliminating similar terms on both sides of Eq. (34) yields

      14c03(jb+ja)(j2b+j2a)+13c12¯t(j2b+jajb+j2a)=12c03(j3b+j3a)+12c12¯t(j2b+j2a).

      (35)

      Then, we can obtain

      14c03(j3b+j2bja+jbj2a+j3a)+13c12¯t(j2b+jajb+j2a)=12c03(j3b+j3a)+12c12¯t(j2b+j2a),

      (36)

      which implies

      0=14c03(j3ajaj2bj2ajb+j3b)+16c12¯t(j2b2jajb+j2a)=14c03(jb+ja)(jbja)2+16c12¯t(jbja)2.

      (37)

      By simplifying the above equation, we can obtain

      (jbja)2[14c03(ja+jb)+16c12¯t]=0.

      (38)

      Denoting jjbja=JbJa,j+jb+ja and considering Eq. (38), j+ can be solved as

      j+=2c12¯t3c03,

      (39)

      Substituting Eq. (39) into Eq. (29) yields

      j=4c11¯t+(4c2123c034c21)¯t2c03.

      (40)

      Near the critical point, the temperature dependence of the order parameter is

      JbJa2Aβ(ˆTˆTc)1/2.

      (41)

      Thus, β=12.

    • 3.   Critical exponent of heat capacity
    • According to definition (21), the critical exponent of heat capacity can be obtained as follows. Recall that the energy ˆM is expressed by

      ˆM=(a2+r2+)(r2+l2+1)2r+(1a2l2)3/2,

      (42)

      then, the heat capacity CJ can be calculated as

      CJ=(ˆMˆT)J|c=38P0.

      (43)

      Since the heat capacity neither diverges nor vanishes, α and α are both zero, i.e., α=α=0.

    • 4.   Degree of isothermal compressibility
    • The isothermal comprssibility κT is defined as

      κT=1J(JˆΩH)ˆT,

      (44)

      which diverges at the critical point. ˜ω,˜t , and ˜j are introduced as

      ˜ω=ˆΩHˆΩHcˆΩHc,˜t=ˆTˆTcˆTc,˜j=JJcJc,

      (45)

      which yields

      ˆΩH=ˆΩHc˜ω+ˆΩHc,ˆT=ˆTc˜t+ˆTc,J=Jc˜j+Jc,

      (46)

      and

      ω=ˆΩHc˜ω,¯t=ˆTc˜t,j=Jc˜j.

      (47)

      Eq. (27) can be rewritten as

      ˜ω=~c10˜t+~c20˜t2+~c11˜t˜j+~c30˜t3+~c03˜j3+~c21˜t2˜j+~c12˜t˜j2.

      (48)

      Using Eq. (44), we obtain

      1JκT=1(JˆΩH)ˆT=(ˆΩHJ)ˆT.

      (49)

      Combining Eqs. (41), (46), (47), and (48) yields

      1JκT=(ˆΩHJ)ˆT=(ˆΩH˜j˜jJ)ˆT=ˆΩHcJc(˜ω˜j)˜t(ωj)¯t,

      (50)

      namely

      κT1(ωj)¯t=c11¯t+3c03j2+o(¯t)=C1¯t+o(¯t),

      (51)

      where C1 is a real constant; Eq. (41) is used in the last step. Based on the definition of γ and γ in Eq. (22), we obtain γ=γ=1.

    • C.   Free energy and Widom scaling

      1.   Free energy
    • According to the differential expression dG=SdˆT+JdˆΩH, at constant angular velocity ˆΩH, we can employ Eqs. (3), (10), and (11) to plot the GˆT diagram.

      From Fig. 4, the swallowtail structure is analogous to the van der Waals system. This further confirms the similarity between the modified thermodynamics and the PVT system.

      Figure 4.  (color online) Qualitative behavior of free energy as a function of temperature for various angular velocities with l=1. The angular velocity decreases from bottom to top. The green solid line corresponds to ˆΩH>ˆΩHc, the yellow solid line represents ˆΩH=ˆΩHc, and the remaining red solid lines correspond to ˆΩH<ˆΩHc. For ˆΩH<ˆΩHc, the existence of the swallowtail structure implies that a first-order phase transition occurs in the system.

    • 2.   Widom scaling law
    • It is well-known that, in the vicinity of the critical point, the free energy can be expressed as a homogenous function, with corresponding homogenous indices p and q [28]. Based on the previous discussions, we observe that the critical exponents satisfy the following expected relations:

      α+2β+γ=2,α+β(γ+1)=2,

      (52)

      γ(δ+1)=(2α)(δ1),γ=β(δ1).

      (53)

      The free energy has the following scaling symmetry

      gs(Λpϵ,Λqj)=Λgs(ϵ,j),p=12,q=34.

      (54)

      In terms of p and q [28], the critical exponets read

      α=2p1q,

      (55)

      β=1qp,

      (56)

      γ=2q1p,

      (57)

      δ=q1q.

      (58)

      The above scaling relations can be considered as consistency checks for the critical exponents we obtained in this section.

    V.   PHASE STRUCTURE ON (P, ˆV) SECTION
    • In standard black hole thermodynamics, the phase structure on the (P,V) section has been investigated [1719, 23, 29]. In this section, we study the phase structures on the (P, ˆV) section in modified black hole thermodynamics. In Fig. 5, we plot the PˆV diagram corresponding to the Kerr-AdS black hole.

      Figure 5.  (color online) P-ˆV diagram of the Kerr-AdS black hole with J=1. The brown solid line is the critical isotherm, and the red dot is the critical point.

      Following the method used in [29], after neglecting all higher order terms of J, the equation of state can be written as

      P=3π6ˆT3ˆV12 62/33πˆV2/3+2πJ2(436π2/3ˆT3ˆV+3)3(36π2/3ˆTˆV4/3+ˆV)2,

      (59)

      where ˆV satisfies

      ˆV=4πr3+3+48π(4πPr2++1)J2r+(8πPr2++3)2.

      (60)

      Following the critical point condition PˆV|TC=0,2PˆV2|TC=0, we can obtain

      Pc=0.003J,ˆVc=129.603J3/2,ˆTc=0.041J.

      (61)

      Consider the phase transition that occurs below the critical temperature ˆTc. In Fig. 5, a van der Waals-like phase structure can be observed. The behavior of physical variables near the critical point is quantitatively described by the critical exponents. Following a similar method as in Section IV, we obtain

      α=α=0,β=12,γ=1,δ=3.

      (62)

      The above results show that the phase structure for the modified black hole thermodynamics in the (P,ˆV) section is almost the same as the standard one [30, 31]; the only difference is that all thermal quantities have a deformation factor 1Ξ, which is shown in Eq. (7).

    VI.   DISCUSSION
    • In Kerr-AdS spacetime, there exist two sets of the first law of thermodynamics because of different choices of observers at infinity. In particular, we investigated the critical phenomena of black hole thermodynamics associated with rotating observers. Based on the modified first law and mass formula, we obtained the phase structures in the extended phase space for both the (ˆΩH,J) cross-section and (P,ˆV) cross-section. In comparison with previous results [16], the phase structure within the (ˆΩH,J) plane remained analogous to the van der Waals-like phase structure. However, the difference was in the correspondence of thermodynamic quantities. According to a previous study [16], the correspondence is JP, ΩHV, but in our case, it is ˆΩHP,JV. The aforementioned changes result from differences in observers. Compared to non-rotating observers, the energy measured by rotating observers includes a rotational kinetic energy part ˆΩHJ. This variation is equivalent to performing a Legendre transformation in the extended phase space with respect to the conjugate coordinates J and ˆΩH; thus, the thermodynamic quantities correspond differently. Additionally, we discussed the phase structures on the (P,ˆV) plane in modified thermodynamics. We found that the obtained results closely resemble those in standard thermodynamics.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • The authors thank Xiaokai He and Naqing Xie for their useful advice. The authors also thank the referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. These opinions have greatly enhanced the quality of this paper.

Reference (31)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return