-
In this section, we thoroughly examine the quantum-corrected AdS-RN black hole, which is encapsulated within Kiselev spacetime. Our objective is to perform an exhaustive analysis of its attributes, particularly its thermodynamic topology from the perspective of generalized Helmholtz free energy, which is of paramount importance to our study. We will explore the spacetime metric of the quantum-corrected charged AdS black hole encircled by a Kiselev spacetime. This metric is distinguished by its spherical symmetry and is formulated as follows [51]:
$ {\rm d}s^2=f(r){\rm d}t^2-f(r)^{-1}{\rm d}r^2-r^2{\rm d}\Omega^2, $
(1) Thus, according to [51],
$ f(r)=-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{\sqrt{r^2-a^2}}{r}+\frac{r^2}{\ell^2}-\frac{c}{r^{3\omega+1}}+\frac{Q^2}{r^2}, $
(2) Here, we note that r > a is used to prevent the formation of imaginary structures. In other words, we consider the quantum fluctuation effects when r is approximately larger than a. In our research, we aim to clarify the parameters that define the black hole in question. The parameter M denotes the black hole's mass, while the parameter a represents how quantum corrections affect the black hole's characteristics. The symbol
$ \ell $ represents the length scale relevant to the asymptotically AdS spacetime. The parameter$ c $ is associated with the cosmological fluid encircling the black hole, and Q indicates the black hole's electric charge. To initiate our discussion, comprehending the rationale for choosing the specific metric and analyzing the origin of each term is crucial. Vissers proposed that the Kiselev black hole model can be expanded to include a spacetime with N components. This extension is marked by a linear correlation between energy and pressure for each component, as detailed in the cited literature [52, 53]. In our analysis, we consider various values for ω, such as ω = –1/3, ω = –2/3, ω = –1, and ω = –4/3. The parameter a is intricately connected to changes in the black hole's mass due to quantum corrections. The underlying theory for this parameter is extensively discussed in [54]. As an independent variable, a possesses the distinctive feature that, when set to zero, the metric reverts to the familiar AdS-Reissner-Nordstrm metric, now shrouded by a cosmic fluid. Theoretically, a can assume any value as long as it is smaller than the event horizon's radius, aligning with the notion that it constitutes a minor modification to the conventional black hole metric,$ {\rm d}M=T{\rm d}S+V{\rm d}P+\phi {\rm d}Q+{\cal{C}}{\rm d}c+{\cal{A}}{\rm d}a. $
(3) To determine the entropy of the quantum-corrected Schwarzschild black hole located in Kiselev spacetime, it is noted in [6] that this entropy is consistent with the Hawking-Bekenstein entropy formula. As a result,
$ S=\frac{A}{4}=\pi r_+^2. $
(4) The formula for pressure is given by
$ P = 3/8\pi\ell^2 $ [55]. The mass and Hawking temperature of the quantum-corrected AdS-RN black hole, enveloped by Kiselev spacetime, are calculated as follows:$ M=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi}}\bigg(\sqrt{S-\pi a^2}-c\pi^{\frac{3\omega+1}{2}}S^{-\frac{3\omega}{2}}+\frac{8PS^{3/2}}{3}+\pi Q^2S^{-1/2}\bigg), $
(5) and
$ \begin{aligned}[b]T_{H}=\;&\big(\frac{\partial M}{\partial S}\big)_{P,Q}=\frac{1}{4\sqrt{\pi}}\Bigg(\frac{1}{\sqrt{S-\pi a^2}}+8P\sqrt{S}\\&+3\frac{c\omega}{\sqrt{\pi}}\big(\frac{\pi}{S}\big)^{\frac{3\omega}{2}+1}-\frac{\pi Q^2}{S^{3/2}}\Bigg).\end{aligned} $
(6) The first law of thermodynamics robustly accommodates variations in the black hole's defining parameters, or hair, which include the black hole's area, cosmological constant, electric charge, quintessence parameter, and quantum correction parameter. For a comprehensive discussion on integrating the quintessence parameter as a thermodynamic variable, our study further develops this framework to include the variability of the quantum correction parameter.
-
Thermodynamic topology is a method that integrates topology into the study of black hole thermodynamics. This approach involves assigning topological numbers to each zero point in the phase diagram. The topological number is determined as the residue of the generalized Helmholtz free energy at the critical point. This unique number can unveil new features and classifications of black hole thermodynamics that conventional methods fail to capture. For instance, it can differentiate between conventional and novel critical points, each bearing distinct implications for the first-order phase transition. The Helmholtz off-shell free energy is an extension of the Helmholtz free energy that accommodates non-equilibrium states of a system. The conventional Helmholtz free energy is the internal energy of the system with the product of temperature and entropy of the system subtracted, representing the amount of useful work obtainable from a closed thermodynamic system at a constant temperature and volume. In contrast, the Helmholtz off-shell free energy is the Legendre transform of the internal energy concerning the entropy, which can be expressed as [26, 56−60]
$ F(S,V,Y)=U(S,V,Y)-TS. $
(7) Here, S represents entropy, V denotes volume, Y encompasses other extensive variables, T represents temperature, and U signifies internal energy. The Helmholtz off-shell free energy is instrumental in analyzing phase transitions and critical points of black holes within various frameworks, such as AdS or dS spaces, and can accommodate scenarios with or without electric charge, including nonlinear electromagnetic fields. To elucidate the thermodynamic properties of black holes, we employ diverse quantities. For instance, mass and temperature can serve as two variables to articulate the generalized free energy. Drawing upon the mass-energy equivalence in black hole physics, we can recast our generalized free energy function to a conventional thermodynamic function as follows [26, 56−60]:
$ {\cal{F}}=M-\frac{S}{\tau}, $
(8) where
$ \tau $ represents the Euclidean time period, and T, which is the inverse of$ \tau $ , denotes the temperature of the ensemble. The vector$ \phi $ is defined as follows [26, 56−60]:$ \phi=(\phi^{r_H},\phi^\Theta)=\left(\frac{\partial{\cal{F}}}{\partial r_{H}},-\cot\Theta\csc\Theta\right), $
(9) Here,
$ r_H $ represents the radius of the event horizon, and the parameter$ 0 \leq \Theta \leq \pi $ is introduced due to the axis limit [26]. It should be noted that the vector field$ \phi $ points outward at the points where$ \Theta = 0 $ and$ \pi $ due to the divergence of the component$ \phi $ at these points. This is analyzed using Duan’s$ \phi $ -mapping topological current. The vector$ \phi_\Theta $ has infinite magnitude and points away from the origin when$ \Theta $ is either 0 or$ \pi $ . The variables$ r_H $ and$ \Theta $ can take any values from 0 to infinity and from 0 to$ \pi $ , respectively. Additionally, we can rewrite the vector as$\phi = ||\phi|| {\rm e}^{{\rm i}\Theta}$ , where$ ||\phi|| = \sqrt{\phi_a \phi_a} $ , or$\phi = \phi^{r_H} + {\rm i}\phi$ . Topology can be applied to black hole thermodynamics to classify the critical points and phase transitions of black hole systems according to their topological charges and numbers. A critical point is a point in the phase diagram where the system changes state or behavior, such as a phase transition or stability change. A topological charge is a quantity that measures the winding number of a vector field around a critical point. A winding number is an integer that counts how many times a vector field wraps around a point in a plane. A topological number is the sum of all the topological charges in a system, which reflects the global topological nature of the system. One way to perform the topological analysis of black hole thermodynamics is to use Duan's topological current$ \phi $ -mapping theory. This theory maps the thermodynamic variables to a vector field$ \phi $ in a two-dimensional plane and defines a topological current$ j^{\mu} $ as [26, 56−60]$ j^{\mu}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}\varepsilon_{ab}\partial_{\nu}n^{a}\partial_{\rho}n^{b}, \quad \mu,\nu,\rho=0,1,2,, $
(10) where
$ n = (n^1, n^2) $ ,$ n^1 = \dfrac{\phi^r}{\|\phi\|} $ , and$ n^2 = \dfrac{\phi^\theta}{\|\phi\|} $ . The topological current is nonzero only at the zero points of$ \phi $ , which correspond to the critical points of the thermodynamic system. The topological charge Q at each critical point is given by [26, 56−60]$ Q_t=\int_\Sigma\Sigma_{i=1}^{n}\beta_{i}\eta_{i}\delta^2(\overrightarrow{x}-\overrightarrow{z})_{i}=\Sigma_{i=1}^{n}\beta_{i}\eta_{i}=\Sigma_{i=1}^{n}\widetilde{\omega}_{i}, $
(11) where
$ \beta_i $ is the positive Hopf index, which counts the loops of the vector$ \phi_a $ in the$ \phi $ space when$ x^\mu $ is near the zero point$ z_i $ . Meanwhile,$ \eta_i = {\rm{sign}}(j_0(\phi/x)_{z_i}) = \pm 1 $ . The quantity$ \widetilde{\omega}_{i} $ represents the winding number for the$ i $ -th zero point of$ \phi $ . The winding number can be calculated by the following formula [26, 56−60]:$ W=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{c_{i}}{\rm d}\Omega, $
(12) Then, the total charge will be
$ Q=\sum\limits_{i}\widetilde{\omega}_{i}. $
(13) Using this method, one can classify different types of black holes according to their topological charges and numbers. The generalized Helmholtz free energy method is another way to perform the topological analysis of black hole thermodynamics; it is based on the generalized off-shell Helmholtz free energy, which is a function of the thermodynamic variables that is valid for any state of the system, not only for the equilibrium states. Using this method, one can plot the generalized off-shell Helmholtz free energy as a function of V for a fixed T and identify the critical points and phase transitions of the black hole system by looking at the shape and features of the curve.
-
Topological techniques are instrumental in analyzing the critical points and phase transitions within black hole thermodynamics. This is achieved by attributing a topological invariant to each critical point on the phase diagram. A topological invariant is a numerical value that delineates the nature and sequence of the phase transition occurring at a critical juncture. This invariance can be determined through the application of the residue theorem or by employing Duan's topological current theory. In this section, our objective is to scrutinize the thermodynamic topology of the aforementioned black holes. We will subsequently elucidate the specifics of our computational approach. Thus, in accordance with the preceding equation, the Helmholtz free energy for this black hole is deduced as follows:
$ \begin{aligned}[b]\\[-10pt]{\cal{F}}=\frac{4 r^{-3 w-1} \left(\dfrac{3}{8} \pi P \sqrt{r^2-a^2} r^{3 w+1}-\dfrac{3}{8} \pi c P r+\dfrac{3}{8} \pi P Q^2 r^{3 w}+r^{3 w+4}\right)}{3 \pi P}-\frac{\pi r^2}{\tau }.\\\end{aligned} $ (14) Two vector fields,
$ \phi^{rh} $ and$ \phi^\theta $ , are calculated in accordance with the concepts previously discussed as follows:$ \phi^{rh}=\frac{r}{2 \sqrt{r^2-a^2}}+\frac{3}{2} c \omega r^{-3 \omega-1}+\frac{4 r^2}{\pi p}-\frac{Q^2}{2 r^2}-\frac{2 \pi r}{\tau }, $
(15) and
$ \phi^\theta=-\frac{\cot\theta}{\sin\theta}, $
(16) Also, we obtain
$ \tau $ as follows:$ \tau=\frac{4 \pi ^2 P \sqrt{r^2-a^2} r^{3 \omega+3}}{3 \pi c P r \omega \sqrt{r^2-a^2}+\pi (-P) Q^2 \sqrt{r^2-a^2} r^{3 \omega}+8 \sqrt{r^2-a^2} r^{3 \omega+4}+\pi P r^{3 \omega+3}}, $
(17) In our study, we consider the thermodynamic topology associated with a quantum-corrected charged AdS black hole enveloped by Kiselev spacetime. The illustrations are bifurcated, showcasing the normalized field lines on the right. The illustrations reveal a singular zero point in Fig. 1 (b), 1 (f), Fig. 2 (b), 2 (d), Fig. 4 (b), 4 (d), and Fig. 5 (b), indicative of the one topological charge determined by the free parameters introduced herein. This charge correlates with the winding number and resides within the blue contour loops at coordinates
$ (r,\theta) $ . The sequence of the illustrations is dictated by the parameter ω; for instance, in Fig. 1, ω is set to$-{1}/{3}$ , and for Fig. 2 through Fig. 5, ω assumes the values$-{2}/{3}$ ,$-{4}/{3}$ , –1, and 0, respectively. To construct these contours, we selected free parameters (Q = 1; a = 0.4, 0.7; c = 0.4, 0.7). The findings from Fig. 1 (b), 1 (f), Fig. 2 (b), 2 (d), Fig. 4 (b), 4 (d), and Fig. 5 (b) reveal that the distinctive feature of a positive topological charge of unity is the zero point enclosed within the contour. Our discourse explores the black hole stability by scrutinizing the winding numbers alongside the specific heat capacity. The affirmative winding numbers infer the thermodynamic stability of the on-shell black hole, which is further substantiated by the specific heat capacity calculations. Considering the solitary on-shell black hole, its topological number aligns with the winding number of 1. This indicates the presence of a single stable on-shell black hole, equating to a topological number that mirrors a positive winding number across all BH configurations$ (W = \widetilde{\omega} = +1) $ . Conversely, Fig. 3 (b) and 3 (c), corresponding to the free parameters (Q = 1; a = 0.4; c = 0.7), portray three topological charges$ (\widetilde{\omega} = -1,+1,-1) $ , culminating in a total topological charge of W = –1. This is a departure from the preceding figures and transpires when ω = –4/3 for the specified black hole. Moreover, Fig. 1 (d), with free parameters Q = 1; a = 0.7; c = 0.4, and Fig. 5 (d) and 5 (e), with free parameters (Q = 1; a = 0.7; c = 0), exhibit four topological charges ($ \widetilde{\omega} = -1,+1, -1,+1 $ ), resulting in a total topological charge of W = 0. The above elucidations confirm that unlike in Fig. 3 (b) and 3 (c) and Fig. 5 (d) and 5 (e), despite pivotal parameters like a, c, and ω directly swaying the count of topological charges, their total topological charge predominantly tallies to +1. Nonetheless, Fig. 3 (b) and 3 (c) and Fig. 5 (d) and 5 (e) stand out with divergent outcomes from other instances, marking a noteworthy observation. In Figs. 1 (a), 1 (c), 1 (e), 2 (a), 2 (c), 3 (a), 4 (a), 4 (c), 5 (a), and 5 (c), we chart the trajectory corresponding to Eq. (17) across varied free parameter values. We summarize these results in Table 1.Figure 1. (color online) Curve of Eq. (17) with respect to (Q = 1; a = 0.4; c = 0.7) in Fig. 1 (a), (Q = 1; a =0.7; c = 0.4) in Fig. 1 (c), and (Q = 1; a = 0.4; c = 0.4) in Fig. 1 (e) for ω = –1/3. In Fig. 1 (b), 1 (d), and 1 (f), the blue arrows represent the vector field n on a portion of the
$ (r-\theta) $ plane for the quantum-corrected AdS-RN black holes in Kiselev spacetime. The blue loops enclose the ZPs.Figure 2. (color online) Curve of equation (17) with respect to (Q = 1; a = 0.4; c = 0.7) in Fig. 2 (a) and (Q = 1; a =0.4; c = 0.4) in Fig. 2 (c) for ω = –2/3. In Fig. 2 (b) and 2 (d), the blue arrows represent the vector field n on a portion of the
$ (r-\theta) $ plane for the quantum-corrected AdS-RN black holes in Kiselev spacetime. The blue loops enclose the ZPs.Figure 4. (color online) Curve of Eq. (17) with respect to (Q = 1; a = 0.4; c = 0.7) in Fig. 4 (a) and (Q = 1; a =0.7; c = 0.4) in Fig. 4 (c) for ω = –1. In Fig. 4 (b) and 4 (d), the blue arrows represent the vector field n on a portion of the (
$ r-\theta $ ) plane for the quantum-corrected AdS-RN black holes in Kiselev spacetime. The blue loops enclose the ZPs.Figure 5. (color online) Curve of Eq. (17) with respect to (Q = 1; a = 0.4; c = 0) in Fig. 5 (a) and (Q = 1; a =0.7; c = 0) in Fig. 5 (c) for ω = 0. In Fig. 5 (b), 5 (d), and5 (e), the blue arrows represent the vector field n on a portion of the
$ (r-\theta) $ plane for the quantum-corrected AdS-RN black holes in Kiselev spacetime. The blue loops enclose the ZPs.Figure 3. (color online) Curve of Eq. (17) with respect to (Q = 1; a = 0.7; c = 0.4) in Fig. 3 (a) for ω = -4/3. In Fig. 3 (b) and 3 (c), the blue arrows represent the vector field n on a portion of the (
$ r-\theta $ ) plane for the quantum-corrected AdS-RN black holes in Kiselev spacetime. The blue loops enclose the ZPs.Free parameters $\widetilde{\omega}$ W (Q = 1; a = 0.4; c = 0.7; ω = –1/3) +1 +1 (Q = 1; a = 0.7; c = 0.4; ω = –1/3) +1,-1,+1 +1 (Q = 1; a = 0.4; c = 0.4; ω = –1/3) +1 +1 (Q = 1; a = 0.4; c = 0.7; ω = –2/3) +1 +1 –(Q = 1; a =0.4; c = 0.4; ω = -2/3) +1 +1 (Q = 1; a = 0.7; c = 0.4; ω = –4/3) –1,+1,-1 -1 –(Q = 1; a = 0.4; c = 0.7; ω = –1) +1 +1 (Q = 1; a = 0.7; c = 0.4; ω = –1) +1 +1 (Q = 1; a = 0.4; c = 0; ω = 0) +1 +1 (Q = 1; a = 0.7; c = 0; ω = 0) –1,+1,-1,+1 0 Table 1. Summary of the results.
Thermodynamic topology of quantum corrected AdS-Reissner-Nordstrom black holes in Kiselev spacetime
- Received Date: 2024-06-13
- Available Online: 2024-11-15
Abstract: In this paper, we consider the intricate thermodynamic topology of quantum-corrected Anti-de Sitter-Reissner-Nordstrm (AdS-RN) black holes within the framework of Kiselev spacetime. By employing the generalized off-shell Helmholtz free energy approach, we meticulously compute the thermodynamic topology of these selected black holes. Furthermore, we establish their topological classifications. Our findings reveal that quantum correction terms influence the topological charges of black holes in Kiselev spacetime, leading to novel insights into topological classifications. Our research findings elucidate that, in contrast to the scenario in which ω = 0 and a = 0.7 with total topological charge W = 0 and ω = –4/3 with total topological charge W = –1, in other cases, the total topological charge for the black hole under consideration predominantly stabilizes at +1. This stabilization occurs with the significant influence of the parameters a, c, and ω on the number of topological charges. Specifically, when ω assumes the values of ω = –1/3, ω = –2/3, and ω = –1, the total topological charge will consistently be W = +1.