-
The experiment was carried out with electron beams at energies in the range of 40–130 MeV. A tungsten plate with a size of 4.5 × 4.5 cm and a thickness of 0.5 cm was used as a converter. In the experiments (Ee = 60, 80, 105, and 130 MeV), cobalt metal samples were irradiated with a bremsstrahlung flux formed in the tungsten converter. To compare the results of experiments performed under different conditions at an energy of 40 MeV, the target was directly irradiated with the electron beam. The main parameters of the experiments are given in Table 1.
Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Experiment 3 Experiment 4 Experiment 5 Energy of electrons/MeV 40 60 80 105 130 Electron beam pulse current/mA 48 40 40 58 50 Irradiation time/min 20 25 15 20 15.5 Integral number of electrons incident on the tungsten converter, ×1015 7.2 ± 0.72 7.5 ± 0.75 4.5 ± 0.45 8.7 ± 0.87 5.8 ± 0.58 Mass of cobalt target/mg 312.0 155.7 145.8 729.5 372.8 Dimensions of cobalt target, cm×cm 1.25×1.25 1.35×0.6 1.25×0.68 1.25×1.25 1.25×1.25 Cooling time/min 50 56 56 39 107 Measuring time of spectra/day 21.8 12.4 8.2 8.1 28.8 Table 1. Main parameters of the experiments.
The electron linac was operated in the stable mode with a beam pulse width of 2 μs and a repetition rate of 10 Hz. The electron current was measured with a high-sensitivity inductive current sensor [16]. After irradiation, the target was transferred to the test room, where the induced activity in the irradiated target was measured using a high-purity germanium detector (HPGe detector). The spectra of γ-quanta of irradiated targets in the energy range from 50 keV to 3.7 MeV were measured using a CANBERRA GC3018 HPGe detector with a volume of 145 cm3. We used the HPGe γ-detector with resolutions of 0.8 keV at 122 keV and of 1.76 keV at 1332 keV in combination with standard measurement electronics and a 8K ADC/MCA (Multiport II Multichannel Analyzer). The relative efficiency of this detector is 34.7%. For γ-activity measurements, the activated sample were placed at 56 and 130 mm from the detector surface to maintain the detector dead time at approximately 5% and reduce counting losses due to the coincidence summing effect. Compton background was missed at approximately 3 hours after irradiation, so the targets were located 10 mm from the detector surface for measuring γ-rays of long-lived isotopes in the target.
Energy and efficiency calibrations of the HPGe detector were carried out using the standard gamma-ray sources 22Na, 54Mn, 57Co, 65Zn, 88Y, 113Sn, 133Ba, 139Ce, 152Eu, 207Bi, and 241Am. The gamma-ray spectra were processed using the program DEIMOS32 [17], which fits the count area of the full-energy peaks with a Gaussian function. The processed peaks were identified on the basis of gamma-ray energy and intensity and the half-life of generated residual nuclei. Typical γ-ray spectra of reaction products from irradiated cobalt with a bremsstrahlung end-point energy of 130 MeV are shown in Fig. 1.
Figure 1. Spectra of residual activity of the irradiated sample of 59Co (top-to-bottom) at 2 h (a), 6 h (b), and 40 days (c) after irradiation. The spectra measurement duration was 10 min (a), 1 h (b), and 7 days (c), respectively. The bremsstrahlung end-point energy used for the irradiation was 130 MeV.
The experimental yields of the reactions Yexp were normalized to one electron of the accelerated beam incident on the bremsstrahlung target and calculated using the following formula:
$ {Y}_{\rm exp}=\frac{{S}_{p} \cdot {C}_{\rm abs}}{\epsilon \cdot {I}_{\gamma }}\frac{{t}_{\rm real}}{{t}_{\rm live}}\frac{1}{N}\frac{1}{{N}_{e}}\frac{{\rm e}^{\lambda \cdot {t}_{\rm cool}}}{(1-{\rm e}^{-\lambda \cdot {t}_{\rm real}})}\frac{\lambda \cdot {t}_{\rm irr}}{(1-{\rm e}^{-\lambda \cdot {t}_{\rm irr}})}, $
(1) where
$ {S}_{p} $ is the full-energy-peak area;$ \epsilon $ is the full-energy-peak detector efficiency;$ {I}_{\gamma } $ is the gamma emission probability;${C}_{\rm abs}$ is the correction for self-absorption of gamma rays in the sample;${t}_{\rm real}$ and${t}_{\rm live}$ are the real and live times of the measurement, respectively;$ N $ is the number of atoms in the activation sample;$ {N}_{e} $ is the integral number of incident electrons;$ \lambda $ is the decay constant;${t}_{\rm cool}$ is the cooling time; and${t}_{\rm irr}$ is the irradiation time. The main γ-ray energies and intensities used to determine the yield of reaction products are listed in Table 2. The nuclear data in Table 2 were extracted from Ref. [18].Product of reaction Half-life Reaction Threshold/MeV Eγ/keV (Iγ(%)) 58gCo 70.86 d 59Co(γ, n) 10.45 810.76 (99.45) 58mCo 9.10 h 59Co(γ, n) 10.48 24.89 (0.0397) 57Co 271.74 d 59Co(γ, 2n) 19.03 122.06 (85.6), 136.47 (10.68) 56Co 77.236 d 59Co(γ, 3n) 30.40 846.77 (99.94), 1037.84 (14.05), 1238.29 (66.46), 1771.36 (15.41), 2598.5 (16.97) 55Co 17.53 h 59Co(γ, 4n) 40.49 477.2 (20.2), 931.1 (75), 1408.5 (16.9) 53Fe 8.51 m 59Co(γ, 5n1p) 58.93 377.88 (42) 52Fe 8.275 h 59Co(γ, 6n1p) 69.61 168.688 (99.2) 56Mn 2.58 h 59Co(γ, 1n2p) 27.98 846.76 (98.85), 1810.73 (26.9), 2113.09 (14.2) 54Mn 312.2 d 59Co(γ, 1n1α) 17.17 834.85 (99.98) 59Co(γ, 3n2p) 45.46 52gMn 5.59 d 59Co(γ, 3n1α) 38.16 744.23 (90), 935.54 (94.5), 1434.06 (100) 59Co(γ, 5n2p) 66.45 52mMn 21.1 min 59Co(γ, 3n1α) 38.54 377.74 (1.68), 1434.06 (98.2) 59Co(γ, 5n2p) 66.83 51Cr 27.7 d 59Co(γ, 3n1p1α) 44.71 320.08 (9.91) 59Co(γ, 5n3p) 73.00 49Cr 42.3 min 59Co(γ, 5n1p1α) 66.97 62.29 (16.4), 90.64 (53.2), 152.93 (30.3) 59Co(γ, 7n3p) 95.26 Table 2. Spectroscopic data from Ref. [18] for product-nuclei from photonuclear reactions.
The yields Ytheor of photonuclear reactions representing the convolution of the photonuclear reaction cross section σ(E) and distribution density of the number of bremsstrahlung photons over energy per one electron of the accelerator W(E, Eγmax) were determined as a result of the experiment. For the yield measurement of a natural mixture of isotopes, the result is the yield of isotope production in all possible reactions on the natural mixture:
$ {Y}_{\rm theor}=\underset{{E}_{\rm th}}{\overset{{E}_{\gamma {\rm max}}}{\int }}\sigma \left(E\right)W\left(E,{E}_{\gamma {\rm max}}\right){\rm d}E, $
(2) where Eγmax is the kinetic energy of electrons hitting the tungsten radiator, E is the energy of bremsstrahlung photons produced on the radiator, and Eth is the threshold of the studied photonuclear reaction.
The use of the relative yields makes it possible to obtain the dependence of the probability of photonuclear reactions on the maximum energy of bremsstrahlung under different experimental conditions. The calibration with respect to the yield of the most probable reaction excludes the influence of the total photon absorption cross section. In our case, the 59Co(γ, n)58m+gCo reaction was chosen as a dominant reaction because of its wide application in this capacity. The half-lives of the isotopes 58mCo and 58gCo are 9.10 hours and 70.86 days, respectively. 58mCo decays by IT with a branching fraction of 100%. Given that 58mCo has the single gamma line with Eγ = 24.89 keV, it is not possible to experimentally determine the yield of this isotope by the usual method from the peak in the residual activity spectrum; the detector used detects γ-quanta starting from 50 keV. We could determine only the cumulative yield of 58m+gCo. Thus, the net photopeak counts of 58gCo from different spectra were taken after the decay of more than ten half-lives of 58mCo.
Theoretical values of the relative yields can be calculated using the following formula:
$ {Y}_{{\rm rel},i}=\frac{\displaystyle \int_{E_{\rm th}}^{E_{\gamma{\rm max}}} \sigma_{i} \left(E\right)W\left(E,{E}_{\gamma {\rm max}}\right){\rm d}E}{\displaystyle\int_{E_{\rm th}}^{E_{\gamma {\rm max}}} \sigma_{(\gamma ,n)}\left(E\right)W\left(E,{E}_{\gamma {\rm max}}\right){\rm d}E}. $
(3) Owing to the assumption on the unchanged shape of the bremsstrahlung spectrum, the bremsstrahlung photon production cross section σ(E, Eγmax) must be taken as the function W (E, Eγmax):
$ {Y}_{{\rm rel},i}=\frac{\displaystyle \int_{E_{\rm th}}^{E_{\gamma{\rm max}}}{\sigma }_{i}\left(E\right)\sigma \left(E,{E}_{\gamma {\rm max}}\right){\rm d}E}{\displaystyle \int_{E_{\rm th}}^{E_{\gamma{\rm max}}}{\sigma }_{(\gamma ,n)}\left(E\right)\sigma \left(E,{E}_{\gamma {\rm max}}\right){\rm d}E}, $
(4) where σ(E, Eγmax) is calculated based on the Zeltzer-Berger tables [19].
The total and partial cross sections σ(E) of the 59Co(γ, xnyp) reaction were computed for monochromatic photons with the TALYS code. The phenomenological models used below are generally parameterized in terms of Lorentzian forms with giant resonance parameters:
• σXl: strength of the giant resonance,
• EXl: energy of the giant resonance,
• ГXl: width of the giant resonance.
The photoreaction cross section data were compared to theoretical calculations on the basis of three standard models of the γSF, namely the Kopecky-Uhl generalized Lorentzian model (GLO) [20], Brink-Axel standard Lorentzian model (SLO) [21, 22], and simplified modified Lorentzian model (MLO) [23]. In addition to these phenomenological models (GLO, SLO, and MLO), two microscopic models, namely the Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov model with QRPA, proposed by Goriely et al. (HFB+QRPA) [24], and the Gogny-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov model with QRPA, proposed by Goriely et al. (GHF+QRPA) [25], were used. This approach is natural, because it involves the use of a single-particle nuclear level scheme, which means that the individual properties of each nucleus are considered.Fig. 2 shows experimental data and results of TALYS models on the cross section of reactions (γ, n), (γ, 2n), (γ, n)+ (γ, np), and (γ, 1n2p) on 59Co.
GLO was suggested to predict the correct behavior of the E1 γ-strength functions in the low-energy range by adopting the temperature-dependent width along with the non-zero limiting value as Eγ goes to zero. We used SLO for all multipoles higher than 1. The MLO model was developed to provide an improved estimate of the E1 and M1 PSFs for all nuclei. The HFB+QRPA model is based on the Skyrme force. In this model, some phenomenological corrections are introduced to take into account the damping of the collective motion as well as the deformation effects. The GHF+QRPA model allows for a consistent description of axially symmetric deformations; it phenomenologically includes the impact of multiparticle multihole configuration as a function of their densities.
The photon flux in the sample was simulated using Geant4 [26]. The energy spectrum of bremsstrahlung in the location of cobalt samples is shown in Fig. 3. In the experiments at 60 and 80 MeV, the shape of the electron beam was round, setting a diameter of 5.5 mm. In the experiments at 40, 105, and 130 MeV, the shape of the electron beam was a rectangle with a size of 2 mm × 20 mm.
-
The relative yields Yrel of the photonuclear reactions measured in the bremsstrahlung end-point energy range of 40–130 MeV from the conducted experiment are given in Table 3 and Figs. 4–7.
Isotope Bremsstrahlung end-point energy/MeV Relative yields (%) Experiment TALYS-1.96 GLO SLO MLO HFB+QRPA GHF+QRPA
57Co40 18 ± 2 23 19 24 29 19 60 17 ± 2 26 21 26 31 21 80 17 ± 2 27 22 27 31 21 105 18 ± 2 28 23 28 32 22 130 21 ± 2 28 23 28 32 22
56Co40 0.33 ± 0.04 0.40 0.23 0.34 0.25 0.27 60 0.32 ± 0.03 1.45 0.81 1.04 0.72 0.84 80 0.44 ± 0.02 1.82 1.04 1.26 0.87 1.00 105 0.51 ± 0.04 2.08 1.22 1.43 0.99 1.12 130 0.52 ± 0.05 2.17 1.34 1.55 1.08 1.20
55Co60 0.0071 ± 0.0008 0.059 0.033 0.034 0.022 0.026 80 0.015 ± 0.003 0.125 0.074 0.071 0.047 0.052 105 0.029 ± 0.005 0.170 0.103 0.098 0.067 0.071 130 0.091 ± 0.009 0.195 0.125 0.117 0.081 0.084 53Fe 105 0.0056 ± 0.0006 0.048 0.031 0.029 0.021 0.019 52Fe 130 0.0006 ± 0.0001 0.0032 0.0021 0.0019 0.0014 0.0013
56Mn60 0.048 ± 0.005 0.21 0.11 0.12 0.05 0.06 80 0.096 ± 0.011 0.43 0.24 0.23 0.11 0.11 105 0.155 ± 0.016 0.56 0.32 0.31 0.15 0.15 130 0.396 ± 0.044 0.63 0.38 0.36 0.18 0.17
54Mn60 0.65 ± 0.07 0.88 0.56 0.81 0.72 0.64 80 0.77 ± 0.08 1.39 0.87 1.10 0.92 0.85 105 0.93 ± 0.10 1.85 1.16 1.38 1.13 1.03 130 1.26 ± 0.14 2.06 1.31 1.52 1.23 1.13
52gMn60 0.0044 ± 0.006 0.021 0.012 0.012 0.008 0.009 80 0.015 ± 0.002 0.064 0.038 0.037 0.025 0.027 105 0.022 ± 0.003 0.139 0.088 0.084 0.059 0.058 130 0.137 ± 0.017 0.227 0.149 0.143 0.103 0.098
52mMn60 0.0025 ± 0.0005 0.022 0.012 0.012 0.008 0.009 80 0.019 ± 0.003 0.067 0.039 0.036 0.024 0.026 105 0.038 ± 0.005 0.138 0.085 0.076 0.054 0.053 130 0.091 ± 0.012 0.226 0.146 0.130 0.093 0.089 51Cr 105 0.071 ± 0.008 0.24 0.15 0.14 0.10 0.09 130 0.154 ± 0.014 0.41 0.26 0.24 0.18 0.16 49Cr 105 0.0007 ± 0.0001 0.009 0.006 0.006 0.004 0.004 130 0.009 ± 0.001 0.031 0.021 0.020 0.014 0.013 Table 3. Relative yields of the photonuclear reactions on 59Co at the bremsstrahlung end-point energies of 40–130 MeV from the conducted experiment.
Figure 4. (color online) Relative yields of the 59Co(γ, xn)57,56,55Co reactions as a function of the bremsstrahlung end-point energy from the present study (solid squares) and literature data, [4] (open triangles), [10] (open circles), and [13] (open squares), as well as theoretically calculated values using different models for the E1 gamma-ray strength function in TALYS values.
Figure 5. (color online) Relative yields of the 59Co(γ, xn1p)52,53Fe reactions as a function of the bremsstrahlung end-point energy from the present work (solid squares) and literature data [4] (open triangles), [10] (open circles), and [13] (open squares), as well as the theoretically calculated values using different models for the E1 gamma-ray strength function in TALYS values.
Figure 6. (color online) Relative yields for the production of 52g,52m,54,56Mn from reactions 59Co(γ, xn1α) and 59Co(γ, xn2p) as a function of the bremsstrahlung end-point energy from the present study (solid squares), literature data [13] (open squares), and the theoretically calculated values using different models for the E1 gamma-ray strength function in TALYS values.
Figure 7. (color online) Relative yields for the production of 49,51Cr from reactions 59Co(γ, xn1p1α) and 59Co(γ, xn3p) as a function of the bremsstrahlung end-point energy from the present study (solid squares), literature data [13] (open squares), as well as theoretically calculated values using different models for the E1 gamma-ray strength function in TALYS values.
-
Figure 4 shows relative yields of the 59Co(γ, xn)57,56,55Co reactions. Within the limits of error, our results on relative yields of the 59Co(γ, 2n)57Co reaction in 40 MeV agree well with calculations based on models GLO, SLO and MLO, and with literature data [13]. The experimental points at 60, 67 [13], and 80 MeV are located at lower positions than the calculated data. Our results on the relative yield of the 59Co(γ, 3n)56Co reaction in 40 MeV agree well with calculations based on model SLO. The experimental points at 40 [13], 60, 67 [13], and 80 MeV are located at lower positions than the calculated data. The experimental points on the relative yield of the 59Co(γ, 4n)55Co reaction are also located at lower positions than the calculated data. Given that there are not sufficient experimental points in this area, we cannot draw clear conclusions on the cross sections.
-
It can be seen from Fig. 5 that the experimentally obtained relative yields for the 59Co(γ, 6n1p)52Fe reaction at energies of 162 and 200 MeV in previous studies [13] are not in agreement with the values simulated with TALYS, according to different models. The experimental points at 130 MeV are in agreement with the calculated values based on different models without GLO.
It can be seen from Fig. 5 that the experimentally obtained relative yields for the 59Co(γ, 5n1p)53Fe reaction at energy 102 MeV [13] is not in agreement with the values simulated with TALYS, according to different models. The experimental points at 105 MeV are in agreement with the calculated values based on model HFB+QRPA.
-
It can be seen from Fig. 6 that the experimentally obtained relative yields for the production of 52gMn at the bremsstrahlung end-point energies of 60, 80, and 105 MeV are in agreement with the values simulated with TALYS, according to different models (SLO and MLO). Fig. 6 also shows that the experimentally obtained relative yields for the production of 52mMn at the bremsstrahlung end-point energies of 60, 80, and 105 MeV are in agreement with the values simulated with TALYS, according to models SLO and MLO. Literature data [13] are located at much lower positions than the calculated curves.
Figure 6 shows that the experimentally obtained relative yields for the production of 54Mn at the bremsstrahlung end-point energy of 40 MeV are in agreement with the values simulated with TALYS, according to model GLO. Fig. 6 also shows that the relative yields for the production of 54Mn are an order of magnitude greater than those for the reaction 59Co(γ, 1n2p)56Mn.
Figure 6 shows that the experimentally obtained relative yields for the 59Co(γ, 1n2p)56Mn reaction at the bremsstrahlung end-point energies of 40–100 MeV that are not in agreement with the values simulated with TALYS.
Finally, according to Fig. 6, it is clear that relative yields for reactions producing 54Mn, 52gMn, and 52mMn are not constantly increasing functions. This is due to the fact that in the initial energy region, the main channels for the formation of the 54Mn, 52gMn, and 52mMn isotopes are reactions with the emission of an alpha-particle. Near the energies of the reaction threshold, the 59Co(γ, xn2p)54,52g,52mMn reaction is accompanied with the release of alpha-particles. Consequently, its cross sections decrease. A further increase in the relative yields is associated with the reactions 59Co(γ, xn2p)54,52g,52mMn.
-
It can be seen from Fig. 7 that the experimentally obtained relative yields for the production of 49Cr at an energy of 102 MeV reported in previous studies [13] are not in agreement with the values simulated with TALYS based on different models. However, our experimental points are in agreement with the simulated values based on TALYS with models MLO and HFB+QRPA. Fig. 7 also shows that the experimentally obtained relative yields for the production of 51Cr at energies of 102 and 162 MeV reported in the literature [13] are not in agreement with simulated values based on TALYS with different models.
Furthermore, Fig. 7 shows that the relative yields for reactions producing 51Cr and 49Cr are not constantly increasing functions. This is due to the fact that in the initial energy region, the main channels for the formation of 51Cr and 49Cr isotopes are reactions with emission of alpha-particles. At energies close to the threshold of the reactions 59Co(γ, 5n3p)51Cr and 59Co(γ, 7n3p)49Cr, the cross sections for reactions with the emission of alpha-particles decrease. Therefore, in this energy region in Fig. 7, a decrease in values was observed.
The E1 photon absorption by isotopes of the 59Co (J π = 7/2–) nucleus leads to the excitation of the giant dipole resonance. Upon the decay of the giant dipole resonance via a reaction involving the emission of an alpha particle and three neutrons, a 52Mn nucleus arises in the ground or excited state. Cascades of gamma transitions from excited states lead to the production of the isomeric or ground state of 52Mn. The 52mMn isomeric state decays through electron capture or the isomer transition channel. The probability p for isomer transition to the ground state is 1.75%. Usually, the isomeric and ground states strongly differ in spins. Therefore, the isomeric ratio is represented in most cases through the yields of high- to low-spin states. In the case of 52m,gMn, the spin of the isomeric state of 52mMn is 2+ (low-spin state, l) and that of the unstable ground state of 52gMn is 6+ (high-spin state, h). Therefore, the isomeric ratio of 52m,gMn was computed as the ratio of the high- to low-spin states.
The isomeric ratios for the production of 52m,gMn from reactions 59Co(γ, 3n1α) and 59Co(γ, 5n2p) at different bremsstrahlung end-point energies are plotted in Fig. 8. The measured isomeric yield ratios for the pairs 52m,gMn at 80, 105, and 130 MeV are 0.79 ± 0.18, 0.90 ± 0.14, and 1.03 ± 0.16, respectively. Fig. 8(a) shows that the experimentally obtained isomeric ratio for the pairs 52m,gMn at the bremsstrahlung end-point energies of 80–130 MeV are in agreement with the values simulated with TALYS on the basis of GLO and SLO.Fig. 8(b) shows that our data on isomeric ratio complement the missing experimental data in the literature [10, 13]. Fig. 8(b) includes lines to guide the analysis of literature data [10] (blue dashed line) and [13] (red dashed line). The red line shows exponential growth in the region of 50−600 MeV and further saturation. The blue line coincides with an unchanged linear function surrounded by an isomer ratio value of 0.84. It is necessary to conduct experiments in the energy region of 130−300 MeV to obtain accurate information.
Figure 8. (color online) Isomeric yield ratios of the pairs 52m,gMn produced in 59Co(γ, 3n1α) and 59Co(γ, 5n2p) reactions as a function of the bremsstrahlung end-point energy from the present study (solid squares), literature data [10] (open circles), [13] (open squares), and the theoretically calculated values using different models for the E1 gamma-ray strength function in TALYS values.
Photonuclear reactions on 59Co at bremsstrahlung end-point energies of 40–130 MeV
- Received Date: 2024-03-21
- Available Online: 2024-11-15
Abstract: Relative yields were measured in the 40−130 MeV bremsstrahlung induced reactions of 59Co. The experiments were performed with the beam from the electron linear accelerator LINAC-200 using the activation and off-line γ-ray spectrometric techniques. The bremsstrahlung photon flux was calculated with the Geant4 program. The cross sections were calculated by using the computer code TALYS-1.96 with different models and were found to be in good agreement with the experimental data.