Erratum: Lattice study of the two-photon decay widths for scalar and pseudo-scalar charmonium [Chin. Phys. C 44(8), 083108 (2020)]

Ying Chen; Ming Gong; Ning Li; Chuan Liu; Yu-Bin Liu; Zhaofeng Liu; Jian-Ping Ma; Yu Meng; Chao Xiong; Ke-Long Zhang

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac4bcd

Chinese Physics C> 2022, Vol. 46> Issue(5) : 059001 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac4bcd

Erratum: Lattice study of the two-photon decay widths for scalar and pseudo-scalar charmonium [Chin. Phys. C 44(8), 083108 (2020)]

Ying Chen ^1,2 ,
Ming Gong ^1,2 ,
Ning Li ^3,, ,
Chuan Liu ^4,5 ,
Yu-Bin Liu ⁶ ,
Zhaofeng Liu ^1,2 ,
Jian-Ping Ma ^2,7 ,
Yu Meng ⁸ ,
Chao Xiong ⁸ ,
Ke-Long Zhang ⁸

1.
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
2.
School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3.
School of Science, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an 710032, China
4.
School of Physics and Center for High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
5.
Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, China
6.
School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
7.
Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
8.
School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

References

[1] Zuoheng Zou, Yu Meng, and Chuan Liu, Lattice calculation of χ_c0→2γ decay width, 11 (2021), arXiv:2111.00768

[1]	A. Gandhi , Aman Sharma , Rebecca Pachuau , Namrata Singh , L. S. Danu , S. V. Suryanarayana , B. K. Nayak , A. Kumar . Erratum: Measurement of (n, α) and (n, 2n) reaction cross sections at a neutron energy of 14.92 ± 0.02 MeV for potassium and copper with uncertainty propagation, [A. Gandhi, Aman Sharma, Rebecca Pachuau et al., Chin. Phys. C 46, 014002 (2022)]. Chinese Physics C, 2022, 46(7): 079001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac5e26
[2]	Yu-Chen Liu , Kazuya Mameda , Xu-Guang Huang . Erratum: Covariant Spin Kinetic Theory I: Collisionless Limit, [Y.-C. Liu, K. Mameda, and X.-G. Huang, Chin. Phys. C 44, 094101 (2020)]. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(8): 089001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac009b
[3]	Yong Tang , Yue-Liang Wu . Erratum and Addendum: Flavor non-universal gauge interactions and anomalies in B-meson decays (Chin. Phys. C, 42 (3): 033104 (2018)). Chinese Physics C, 2020, 44(6): 069101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/44/6/069101
[4]	B. S. Ishkhanov , S. V. Sidorov , T. Yu. Tretyakova , E. V. Vladimirova . Erratum and Addendum: Empirical pairing gaps and neutron-proton correlations (Chin. Phys. C, 43(1): 014104 (2019)). Chinese Physics C, 2020, 44(6): 069102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/44/6/069102
[5]	Ying Chen , Ming Gong , Ning Li , Chuan Liu , Yu-Bin Liu , Zhaofeng Liu , Jian-Ping Ma , Yu Meng , Chao Xiong , Ke-Long Zhang , (CLQCD Collaboration) . Lattice study of two-photon decay widths for scalar and pseudo-scalar charmonium. Chinese Physics C, 2020, 44(8): 083108. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/44/8/083108
[6]	Ligong Bian , Huai-Ke Guo , Jing Shu . Erratum and Addendum: Gravitational Waves, baryon asymmetry of the universe and electric dipole moment in the CP-violating NMSSM (Chin. Phys. C, 42(9): 093106 (2018)). Chinese Physics C, 2019, 43(12): 129101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/43/12/129101
[7]	Chao-Yi Lü , P. Wang , Y. B. Dong , P. N. Shen , Z. Y. Zhang , D. M. Li . Phenomenological study on the decay widths of Υ(nS)→d^(2380)+X^. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(6): 064102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/6/064102
[8]	. Retraction Notice: Impact of charm H1-ZEUS combined data and determination of the strong coupling in two different schemes (Chin. Phys. C 41(11) 113104 (2017)). Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(8): 089001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/8/089001
[9]	Ying Chen , Wei-Feng Chiu , Ming Gong , Long-Cheng Gui , Zhao-Feng Liu . Exotic vector charmonium and its leptonic decay width. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(8): 081002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/8/081002
[10]	. Retraction Notice: “High power acceleration of an HSC type injector for cancer therapy”, Chin. Phys. C 40(7) 077001. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(9): 099101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/9/099101
[11]	LI Xu-Xin , YUE Chong-Xing , CHEN Jian-Xing , DAI Jie-Nian . Production of a neutral scalar associatedwith a photon at the LHC in the topcolor-assisted technicolor model. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(6): 485-488 . doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/6/002
[12]	FU Yong-Ping , LI Yun-De . Large transverse momentum dilepton production in heavy ion collisions with two-photon processes. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(2): 109-112. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/2/001
[13]	K. B. Vijaya Kumar , Antony Prakash Monteiro . Light meson spectrum and their leptonic decay widths in the frame work of constituent quark models. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1396-1398. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/052
[14]	Helmut Vogel (on behalf of the CLEO collaboration) . Charmonium spectroscopy and decay at CLEO-c. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 621-625. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/002
[15]	Frederic Jugeau . Holographic models of the scalar sector of QCD. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1516-1519. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/088
[16]	P. Gauzzi (for the KLOE collaboration) . KLOE results on scalar and pseudoscalar mesons. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 632-637. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/004
[17]	ZHANG Zhi-Qing , XIAO Zhen-Jun . Study of scalar meson a₀(980) from B→a₀(980)π decays. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(5): 528-534. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/5/002
[18]	H. Nakazawa . Two-photon processes at Belle. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 801-806. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/031
[19]	ZHU Wen-Han , ZHAO Yan-E , ZHANG Yun-Long , XU Zi-Zong , WANG Xiao-Lian . Experimental study of multi-photon contamination on the measurement offluorescent decay time. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(11): 912-915. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/32/11/013
[20]	Bian Jianguo , Huang Tao . Pseudo-Scalar Meson Solutions of the Equal-Time Equation IN QCD. Chinese Physics C, 1994, 18(2): 127-136.

Access

Get Citation

Ying Chen, Ming Gong, Ning Li, Chuan Liu, Yu-Bin Liu, Zhaofeng Liu, Jian-Ping Ma, Yu Meng, Chao Xiong and Ke-Long Zhang. Erratum: Lattice study of the two-photon decay widths for scalar and pseudo-scalar charmonium [Chin. Phys. C 44(8), 083108 (2020)][J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac4bcd

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2022-01-10

Article Metric

Article Views(1125)
PDF Downloads(26)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Erratum: Lattice study of the two-photon decay widths for scalar and pseudo-scalar charmonium [Chin. Phys. C 44(8), 083108 (2020)]

Corresponding author: Ning Li, lining@xatu.edu.cn

1. Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

2. School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

3. School of Science, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an 710032, China

4. School of Physics and Center for High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

5. Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, China

6. School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China

7. Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

8. School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received Date: 2022-01-10

Available Online: 2022-05-15

Abstract:

HTML

It is bought to the authors' attention from a recent study [1] that, one should consider the final state photon exchange symmetry in the process of two-photon decay widths for various charmonia. This renders the form factors in Eq. (23)-Eq. (26) of the original paper differ by a factor of two and the final decay width by a factor of four. Therefore, Eq. (23)-Eq. (26) now should read,

$ \begin{aligned}[b] F(0,0)_{B1} = & 2\times0.1283(1)(3)(77)\;, \\ = &0.2566(2)(6)(154)\; \end{aligned} $

(1)

$ \begin{aligned}[b] F(0,0)_{C1} = & 2\times0.1240(4)(13)(68)\;, \\= &0.248(8)(26)(136)\; \end{aligned} $

(2)

$ \begin{aligned}[b] G(0,0)_{B1} = & 2\times0.1017(7)(102)(126)\;, \\ = &0.2034(14)(204)(252)\; \end{aligned} $

(3)

$ \begin{aligned}[b] G(0,0)_{C1} = & 2\times0.0907(8)(19)(90)\;,\\ = &0.1814(16)(38)(180)\;, \end{aligned} $

(4)

and the decay widths shown in Eq.(27) of the original paper should be modified to the following:

$ \begin{aligned}[b] \Gamma(\eta_c\rightarrow \gamma\gamma)_{B1} = & 4\times1.62(19)\;{\rm{KeV}} , \\ = &6.48(76)\;{\rm{KeV}} , \end{aligned} $

(5)

$ \begin{aligned}[b] \Gamma(\eta_c\rightarrow \gamma\gamma)_{C1} = & 4\times1.51(17)\;{\rm{KeV}} , \\ = &6.04(68)\;{\rm{KeV}} , \end{aligned} $

(6)

$ \begin{aligned}[b] \Gamma(\chi_{c0}\rightarrow \gamma\gamma)_{B1} = & 4\times1.18(38)\;{\rm{KeV}} , \\ = &4.72(152)\;{\rm{KeV}} , \end{aligned} $

(7)

$ \begin{aligned}[b] \Gamma(\chi_{c0}\rightarrow \gamma\gamma)_{C1} = & 4\times0.93(19)\;{\rm{KeV}} , \\ = &3.72(76)\;{\rm{KeV}} . \end{aligned} $

(8)

The decay widths are now in better agreement with the experiment values.

Reference (1)

Erratum: Lattice study of the two-photon decay widths for scalar and pseudo-scalar charmonium [Chin. Phys. C 44(8), 083108 (2020)]

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article