-
The electric conductivity can be evaluated from the Kubo formula related to the current-current correlation for a system in thermal equilibrium. It also can be derived by extracting the proportionality coefficient of the induced electric current responding to the applied external electric field according to Ohm's law
${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{j}}}} = \sigma {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{E}}}}$ . Ohm's law can be extended to a covariant form applicable to the non-Abelian plasma [28,40-47]$ j^\mu_a = \sigma^{\mu\nu}_{ab}F^b_{\nu\lambda}u^\lambda, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ a,b = 1,2,...,8, $
(1) where
$ F^b_{\nu\lambda} $ and$ u^\lambda $ are the field strength tensor and the fluid velocity, respectively. The current$ j^\mu_a $ is induced by the color-electric field$ F^b_{\nu\lambda}u^\lambda $ . Therefore, the proportionality coefficient$ \sigma^{\mu\nu}_{ab} $ is the color-electric conductivity tensor through which we can study the conductivity properties.The kinetic equation for partons is given by [41,45,46,48]
$ p^\mu D_\mu Q^i(p,x)+\frac{g}{2}\theta^ip^\mu \{F_{\mu\nu}(x),\partial^\nu_pQ^i(p,x)\} = C, $
(2) $ Q^i(p,x) $ with$ i\in{g,q,\overline{q}} $ denote the distribution functions of gluon, quark, and antiquark, respectively, which are$ (N_c^2-1)\times(N_c^2-1) $ and$ N_c\times N_c $ matrices respectively;$ \theta^{g} = \theta^{q} = 1 $ ,$ \theta^{\bar{q}} = -1 $ , and$ \partial_{\nu}^{(p)} $ denotes the four-momentum derivative.$ D_\mu $ ($ {\cal{D}}_\mu $ ) represents the covariant derivatives$D_\mu = \partial_\mu-{\rm i}g[A_\mu(x),\cdots]$ (${\cal{D}}_\mu = \partial_\mu-{\rm i}g[{\cal{A}}_\mu(x)\cdots]$ ) with the gauge field$ A^{\mu} = A^{\mu}_a \tau^a $ ($ {\cal{A}}^{\mu} = {\cal{A}}^{\mu}_a T^a $ ), where$ \tau^a $ ($ T^a $ ) is the${SU}(N_{c})$ group generators in the fundamental (adjoint) representation with$ {\rm{Tr}}[\tau^a,\tau^b] = \dfrac{1}{2}\delta^{ab} $ (${{\rm Tr}[T^a,T^b]} = N_c\delta^{ab}$ ).$F_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu-\partial_\nu A_\mu-{\rm i}g[A_\mu,A_\nu]$ represents the strength tensor in the fundamental representation, and$ {\cal{F}}_{\mu\nu} $ is its counterpart in the adjoint representation.$ C $ is the collision term.The transport equations are supplemented by the Yang-Mills equation
$ D_\mu F^{\mu\nu}(x) = j^\nu(x) $ , and the color current$ j^\nu(x) $ is given in the fundamental representation as$ \begin{aligned}[b] j^\nu(x) =& -\frac{g}{2}\int_pp^\nu[Q^q(p,x)-Q^{\bar{q}}(p,x)-\frac{1} {3}{\rm Tr}[Q^q(p,x)\\& -Q^{\bar{q}}(p,x)]+2\tau^a {\rm Tr}[T^aQ^g(p,x)]], \end{aligned}$
(3) where
$\int_p = \int \dfrac{{\rm d}^4p}{(2\pi)^3}2 \Theta(p_0) \delta(p^2).$ In the Vlasov approximation
$ C = 0 $ , by solving the QGP transport equations (2) and (3) associated with Eq. (1) in the linear response approximation, one can obtain the color-electric conductivity of the QGP [40,41,43, 45,46] in the hard thermal loop (HTL) approximation. -
Viscosity will modify the distribution functions of the constituents of a microscopic system [6,10,81-83]. If only shear viscosity is taken into account, the distribution function becomes
$ Q = Q_o+\delta Q = Q_o+\frac{c'}{2T^3}\frac{\eta}{s}Q_o(1\pm Q_o)p^\mu p^\nu\langle \nabla_\mu u_\nu \rangle. $
(4) In Eq. (4), "
$ + $ "("$ - $ ") is for boson (fermion), and$ c' = $ $ \pi^4/90\zeta(5) $ ($ c' = 14 \pi^4/1350\zeta(5) $ ) is for massless boson (fermion) [6,10,82,83].$ \langle \nabla_\mu u_\nu \rangle = \nabla_\mu u_\nu + \nabla_\nu u_\mu - \dfrac{2}{3} \Delta_{\mu\nu}\nabla_{\gamma}u^{\gamma} $ ;$ \nabla_{\mu} = (g_{\mu\nu} - u_{\mu}u_{\nu})\partial^{\nu}$ ;$ \Delta^{\mu\nu} = g^{\mu\nu} - u^{\mu}u^{\nu} $ ; and$ \eta, s $ ,$ T $ , and$ Q_o $ represent the shear viscosity, entropy density, temperature of the system, and equilibrium distribution function of boson or fermion, respectively. This ansatz of the distribution function is widely used in hydrodynamic simulations to study the phenomenology of relativistic heavy ion collisions.Note that only when the system is slightly off-equilibrium, it is possible to evaluate the small deflection of the distribution
$ \delta Q $ from its equilibrium value$ Q_o $ due to non-equilibrium effect [81]. The viscous corrected distribution function used in (4) is much smaller than the equilibrium one$ \delta Q<<Q_o $ , which implies a small value of the velocity gradient. Therefore, the color-electromagnetic fields dominate interaction in QGP system, and the collision terms in transport equations may be neglected. In Refs. [23,24], the authors have extended the ideal chromohydrodynamic equations [46,84,85] to the viscous ones by expanding the collisionless kinetic equation (2) in momentum moments in terms of distribution function modified by shear viscosity (4). It is argued that chromohydrodynamics can describe the polarization effect as the kinetic theory [24,86]. In addition, the fluid equations dealing with conservative equations of the macroscopic physical quantities are much simpler than those of the kinetic theory. Therefore, one can study the connection of the color-electric conductivity and shear viscosity of a quark gluon system with viscous chromohydrodynamics.The constitutive equations for the viscous chromohydrodynamics are [23,24],
$ D_\mu n^\mu = 0, \ \ \ \ \ D_\mu T^{\mu\nu}-\frac{g}{2}\{F^\nu_\mu,n^\mu(x)\} = 0 $
(5) with
$ n^\mu(x) = \int_p p^\mu Q(p,x), \ \ T^{\mu\nu}(x) = \int_p p^\mu p^\nu Q(p,x), $
(6) where
$ Q(p,x) $ is the distribution function modified by shear viscosity (4). For detailed derivation of viscous chromohydrodynamic equations, please refer to Refs. [23,24,85].The four-flow
$ n^\mu $ and energy momentum tensor$ T^{\mu\nu} $ can be expressed in the form [23,24]$ \begin{aligned}[b] n^\mu =& n(x) u^\mu, \\ T^{\mu\nu} =& \frac{1}{2}(\epsilon(x)+p(x)) \{u^\mu,u^\nu\}-p(x)g^{\mu\nu}+\pi^{\mu\nu}, \end{aligned} $
(7) where
$ \begin{aligned}[b] \pi^{\mu\nu} = &\eta \langle \nabla^\mu u^\nu \rangle = \eta \{(g^{\mu\rho}-u^\mu u^\rho)\partial_\rho u^\nu+(g^{\nu\rho}\\&-u^\nu u^\rho)\partial_\rho u^\mu-\frac{2}{3}(g^{\mu\nu}-u^\mu u^\nu)\partial_\sigma u^\sigma\}. \end{aligned} $
(8) If
$ \eta = 0 $ , the distribution function (4) remains the ideal form;$ \pi^{\mu\nu} $ will be absent in (7), and the chromohydrodynamic equations will turn to the ideal ones [84,85].The color current (3) reads
$ j^\mu(x) = -\frac{g}{2}\left(nu^\mu-\frac{1}{3}{\rm Tr} [nu^\mu]\right). $
(9) Eqs. (5), (7) and (9) make up the basic set of equations of viscous chromohydrodynamics. In those equations,
$ n $ ,$ \epsilon $ , and$ p $ represent the particle density, energy density, and pressure, respectively. Usually, hydrodynamic quantities have both colorless and colorful parts; as an example, the particle density can be written as [23,24,85]$ n^\mu_{\alpha\beta} = n_0^\mu I_{\alpha\beta}+\frac{1}{2}n_a^\mu \tau^a_{\alpha\beta} , $
(10) where
$ \alpha,\beta = 1,2,3 $ are color indices, and$ I $ is the identity matrix [85]. -
To perform further analysis, we will linearize the hydrodynamic quantities around the stationary, colorless, and homogeneous state, which is described by
$ \bar{n} $ ,$ \bar{u}^\mu $ ,$ \bar{p} $ , and$ \bar{\epsilon} $ . As an example, the particle density$ n(x) $ can be denoted as$ n(x) = \bar{n}+\delta n(x). $
(11) The covariant derivatives of the hydrodynamic quantities in the stationary, colorless, and homogeneous state vanish, for example,
$ D_\mu\bar{n} = 0 $ . In that state, the color current$ j^\mu(x) = 0 $ . The diagonalized fluctuation quantity should be much smaller than the corresponding stationary one$ \delta n\ll \bar{n} $ [23,24,85]. As in Eq. (10), all fluctuation quantities contain both colorless and colorful components,$ \delta n_{\alpha\beta} = \delta n_0 I_{\alpha\beta}+\frac{1}{2}\delta n_a \tau^a_{\alpha\beta}. $
(12) Substituting the linearized hydrodynamic quantities such as those in Eqs. (11) and (12) into Eq. (7) and their corresponding conservation equations (5), projecting them on
$ \bar{u}^\mu $ and$ (g^{\mu\nu}-\bar{u}^\mu\bar{u}^\nu) $ , considering only the equations for colorful parts of fluctuations, and performing the Fourier transformation, one can obtain equations that can describe color phenomena in the viscous QGP [23,24]$ \bar{n}k_\mu\delta u^\mu_a+ k_\mu\delta n_a\bar{u}^\mu = 0, $
(13) $ \bar{u}^\mu k_\mu\delta\epsilon_a+(\bar{\epsilon}+\bar{p})k_\mu\delta u^\mu_a = 0, $
(14) $ \begin{aligned}[b]& (\bar{\epsilon}+\bar{p})(\bar{u}\cdot K)\delta u^\nu_a+(-k^\nu+\bar{u}^\nu(\bar{u}\cdot K))\delta p_a + \eta\{(K^2 \\&\quad-(K\cdot \bar{u}))\delta u^\nu_a + (k^\mu k^\nu-k^\mu \bar{u}^\nu)\delta u_{\mu,a}+\frac{2}{3}(\bar{u}^\nu (K\cdot \bar{u})\\&\quad -k^\nu)k_\rho\delta u^\rho_a\} = {\rm i} g\bar{n}\bar{u}_\mu F_a^{\mu\nu}(K), \end{aligned} $
(15) with
$ \bar{u}\cdot K = \bar{u}^\mu k_\mu $ .According to Eq. (9), the color current due to the color fluctuations of the hydrodynamic quantities is given by [23,24]
$ j^{\,\mu}_a = -\frac{g}{2}\left(\bar{n}\delta u^\nu_a+ \delta n_a\bar{u}^\mu-\frac{1}{3} {\rm Tr} [\bar{{n}}\delta {u}^\mu_{a}+ \delta {n}_{a}\bar{{u}}^\mu]\right). $
(16) By introducing an EoS,
$ \delta p_a = c_s^2\delta\epsilon_a $ to complete the fluid equations (13), (14), and (15) (the explicit formulism for$ c_s $ will be introduced later), we can solve the color fluctuations of hydrodynamic quantities$ \delta n_a $ ,$ \delta u_{\nu,a} $ , and$ \delta\epsilon_a $ [23,24]:$ \delta n_a = -\frac{\overline{n}k_\mu\delta u_a^\mu}{K\cdot \overline{u}}, \ \ \ \ \ \delta\epsilon_a = -\frac{(\overline{\epsilon}+ \overline{p})k_\mu\delta u_a^\mu}{K\cdot \overline{u}}, $
(17) $ \begin{aligned}[b] \delta u_{\sigma,a} =& \frac{1}{1+D(K^2-(K\cdot \overline{u})^2)}\cdot \frac{g\overline{n}}{(\overline{\epsilon}+\overline{p})(K\cdot\overline{ u})}\{g_{\sigma\nu}\\&+(B+E)(k_\sigma k_\nu-\overline{u}_\sigma k_\nu(K\cdot \overline{u}))\}\cdot \overline{u}_\mu iF_a^{\mu\nu}, \end{aligned} $
(18) with
$ \begin{aligned} B = -\frac{c_s^2} {\omega^2-c_s^2k^2}, \ D = \frac{\eta}{sT\omega}, \ E = -\frac{\dfrac{\eta\omega}{sT} \left(1+4\dfrac{c_s^2k^2} {\omega^2-c_s^2k^2}\right)} {3\omega^2-3c_s^2k^2- 4\dfrac{\eta\omega k^2} {sT}}. \end{aligned} $
(19) Substituting the solved
$ \delta n_a $ and$ \delta u^\mu_a $ into Eq. (16), one can obtain the induced color current due to the color fluctuations of hydrodynamic quantities$ \begin{aligned}[b] j_a^\mu =& -\frac{{\rm i}\omega^2_p}{(K\cdot\overline{ u})}\cdot \frac{1}{1+D(K^2-(K\cdot \overline{u})^2)}\left(g^{\mu\sigma}-\frac{\overline{u}^\mu k^\sigma} {K\cdot \overline{u}}\right) \\& \cdot \{g_{\sigma\nu}+(B+E)(k_\sigma k_\nu-\overline{u}_\sigma k_\nu(K\cdot \overline{u}))\}\overline{u}_\rho F_a^{\rho\nu} , \end{aligned}$
(20) where
$ \omega^2_p = \dfrac{g^2\bar{n}^2}{2(\bar{\epsilon}+\bar{p})} $ is the square of the plasma frequency. For a detailed derivation of$ j_a^\mu $ in chromohydrodynamic approach, please refer to Refs. [23,24]. -
According to Eq. (1), we can extract the conductivity tensor from equation (20)
$ \begin{aligned}[b] \sigma_{ab}^{\mu \nu} =& -\frac{\rm i}{\omega}\frac{\delta^{ab}\omega_p^2}{1-Dk^2}\Bigg\{g^{\mu \nu}+(B+E)(k^\mu k^\nu-\overline{u}^\mu k^\nu (K\cdot \overline{u}) ) \\&-\frac{\overline{u}^\mu k^\nu}{(K\cdot \overline{u})}-(B+E)\left(\frac{K^2\overline{u}^\mu k^\nu}{K\cdot \overline{u}}-\overline{u}^\mu k^\nu (K\cdot \overline{u})\right) \Bigg\}. \end{aligned} $
(21) The diagonalized spatial component of
$ \sigma_{ab}^{\mu \nu} $ in the color space from equation (21) reads$ \sigma^{ij} = -\frac{\rm i}{\omega} \frac{\omega_p^2}{1-Dk^2} \{g^{ij}+(B+E)k^ik^j \}. $
(22) For an isotropic, homogeneous plasma medium,
$ \sigma^{ij} $ reduces to two scalar functions according to project operators [41,58,87]$ \sigma^{ij} = \sigma_L\frac{k^ik^j}{k^2}+\sigma_T\left(\delta^{ij}-\frac{k^ik^j}{k^2}\right). $
(23) $ \sigma_L $ and$ \sigma_T $ are the longitudinal and transverse color-electric conductivities, which are independent response functions and do not mix. From the relation between the dielectric functions and the conductivities, the longitudinal conductivity describes the response of the medium to a scalar potential$ \phi $ , and the transverse one reflects the medium response to a vector potential$ {\bf{A}} $ in electrodynamics; for details, please refer to §3.1 in Ref. [87].According to Eqs. (22) and (23), we can obtain
$ \sigma_L = \sigma^{ij}\frac{k_ik_j}{k^2} = \frac{\rm i}{\omega} \frac{\omega_p^2}{1-Dk^2}\{1-(B+E)k^2 \}, $
(24) and
$ \sigma_T = \frac{1}{2}\left(\delta_{ij}-\frac{k_ik_j}{k^2}\right)\sigma^{ij} = \frac{\rm i}{\omega} \frac{\omega_p^2}{1-Dk^2}. $
(25) Substituting
$ B $ ,$ D $ , and$ E $ mentioned in (19) into (24) and (25) and adopting the effective sound speed [23,24,84,85]$ c_s = \sqrt{\dfrac{1}{3\left(1+\dfrac{1}{2y}\log\dfrac{1-y}{1+y}\right)}+\dfrac{1}{y^2}} \;\; \left(y = \dfrac{k}{\omega}\right), $
one can obtain the scaled longitudinal color-electric conductivity
$ \begin{aligned}[b] \frac{\sigma_L(\omega,k)}{\omega_p} =& -\frac{{\rm i}\omega}{1-\dfrac{\eta k^2} {sT\omega}}\frac{3\omega_p}{k^2}\left(1-\frac{\omega}{2k} \log\frac{\omega+k+{\rm i}\xi}{\omega-k+{\rm i}\xi}\right)\\&+\frac{{\rm i}\omega_p} {1-\dfrac{\eta k^2}{sT\omega}} \frac{\eta}{sT}\frac{1} {1+ 4\dfrac{\eta\omega } {sT}{\left(1-\dfrac{\omega}{2k}\log\dfrac{\omega+k+{\rm i}\xi}{\omega-k+{\rm i}\xi}\right)}}\\& \cdot \Bigg\{3\left(1-\frac{\omega}{2k} \log\frac{\omega+k+{\rm i}\xi}{\omega-k+{\rm i}\xi}\right)\\&+\frac{12\omega^2}{k^2}\left(1-\frac {\omega}{2k} \cdot\log\frac{\omega+k+{\rm i}\xi}{\omega-k+{\rm i}\xi}\right)^2\Bigg\}, \end{aligned} $
(26) and the transverse one
$ \frac{\sigma_T}{\omega_p} = \frac{{\rm i}\omega_p}{\omega} \frac{1}{1-\dfrac{\eta k^2}{s\omega T}}. $
(27) As shown in Eqs. (26) and (27), the longitudinal and transverse conductivities are usually complex functions of
$ \omega,k $ . It is argued that, in electrodynamics, the real part of the conductivity describes a finite dissipation of energy [87]. While the imaginary part of the conductivity defines the phase lag between the applied electric field and the induced electric current, which manifests that the medium response has a time delay with respect to the applied disturbation [87,88]. -
As the collisionless approximations of the QGP transport equations are adopted in the derivation of the chromohydrodynamic equations, we may obtain the conductivities in the level of HTL approximation in the presence of shear viscosity. When
$ \eta/s = 0 $ , (26) turns to$ \sigma_L(\omega,k) = -\frac{3{\rm i}\omega\omega_p^2}{k^2}\left(1-\frac{\omega}{2k} \log\frac{\omega+k+{\rm i}\xi}{\omega-k+{\rm i}\xi}\right). $
(28) One can obtain (28) in terms of the dielectric tensor
$ \varepsilon^{ij} $ in the HTL approximation [41,45,46,58] as well as (23) and (24) associated with the relation between the conductivity tensor and the dielectric tensor (31) [43,45,46,58,87] discussed in the following. Therefore, (28) is the HTL result of the longitudinal color-electric conductivity. According to (28), one can obtain the real part of$ \sigma_L $ $ {\rm Re} \sigma_L(\omega,k) = \frac{3\pi\omega_p^2}{4k}\frac{2\omega^2}{k^2}\Theta(k^2-\omega^2). $
(29) $ \Theta $ is the Heaviside step function, which equals to unity for$ k>\omega $ . There is a discrepancy of the factor$ \dfrac{2\omega^2}{k^2} $ between (29) and (3.36) in Ref. [52] obtained from the transverse polarization self-energy$ \Pi_T(\omega,k) $ within the framework of the Boltzmann equation in the collisionless limit and$ k>>\omega $ .As shown in Eq. (27), the transverse color-electric conductivity
$ \sigma_T $ is a pure imaginary function of$ \omega,k $ . When$ \eta/s = 0 $ , (27) cannot recover the HTL result, which can be derived in terms of the HTL dielectric tensor and Eqs. (31), (23), and (25). The viscous chromohydrodynamics can describe the polarization effect as the kinetic theory, which facilitates us to investigate the viscous effect on the electromagnetic properties of the QGP. However, some dynamical information will be lost during the derivation from the kinetic theory to the chromo hydrodynamics [12,84-86]. Nevertheless, the chromohydrodynamics can describe some dynamical information of the system relevant to the longitudinal dielectric properties of the plasma, which can still capture some interesting physics of the QGP.From the discussion in the last two paragraphs, it is evident that, in the chromohydrodynamic approach, the conductivity properties of the QGP are mainly demonstrated by the longitudinal part of the color-electric conductivity
$ \sigma_L(\omega,k) $ . Note that another study shows that the conductivity properties of the QGP under the magnetic field are also mainly derived from the longitudinal part. To the one-loop order, the transverse (with respect to the magnetic field direction) electric conductivity of the QGP vanishes$ \sigma_\bot = 0 $ [65].In the following, we will apply
$ k = 0.2\omega_p $ and$ T = \omega_p $ to perform numerical analysis to study$ \omega $ -dependent behavior of the color-electric conductivity with different values of shear viscosity. We present the real part of the scaled longitudinal color-electric conductivity with respect to frequency at different shear viscosities in Fig. 1. The black, red, green, and blue curves are the cases of$ \eta/s = 0,0.1,0.2,0.3 $ respectively. Fig. 1 shows that, in the space-like region$ \dfrac{\omega}{k}<1 $ , the real part of the longitudinal color-electric conductivity monotonously increases withfrequency. For low frequencies$ \dfrac{\omega}{k}\leqslant 0.3 $ , the viscous curves of${\rm{Re}} \sigma_{L}/\omega_{p}$ almost superpose each other; shear viscosity has a trivial effect on the conductivity. As the frequency increases, the viscous effects on the color-electric conductivity become appreciable, and${\rm{Re}} \sigma_{L}/\omega_{p}$ reduces with the increase in shear viscosity. While for$ \dfrac{\omega}{k}>0.875 $ , for a fixed frequency,$ {\rm{Re}} \sigma_{\rm{L}}/\omega_{\rm{p}} $ increases with shear viscosity, showing a reversed dependence of the longitudinal color-electric conductivity on shear viscosity compared to the case in the small frequency region. In the time-like region$ \dfrac{\omega}{k}>1 $ , the real part of the longitudinal color-electric conductivity begins to vanish.Figure 1. (color online) Real part of the scaled longitudinal color-electric conductivity of the QGP for different ratios of shear viscosity to entropy density
$ \frac{\eta}{s} = 0,0.1,0.2,0.3 $ .The imaginary part of the longitudinal color-electric conductivity is displayed in Fig. 2. In the space-like region, there is a critical frequency which is around
$ \omega_c\sim 0.6k $ ; the imaginary part of the longitudinal color-electric conductivity decreases with frequency for$ \omega\leqslant\omega_c $ . It indicates that shear viscosity has no demonstrable effects on the imaginary part of the conductivity in that frequency region. For$ \omega>\omega_c $ ,${\rm{Im}} \sigma_{L}/\omega_{p}$ rises quickly with increasing frequency. Simultaneously, viscous effects on${\rm{Im}} \sigma_{L}/\omega_{p}$ become remarkable, and${\rm{Im}} \sigma_{L}/\omega_{p}$ diminishes with increasing shear viscosity. In the time-like region,${\rm{Im}} \sigma_{L}/\omega_{p}$ reduces with frequency, while shear viscosity enhances the imaginary part of the longitudinal color-electric conductivity.Figure 2. (color online) Imaginary part of the scaled longitudinal color-electric conductivity of the QGP for different ratios of shear viscosity to entropy density
$ \frac{\eta}{s} = 0,0.1,0.2,0.3 $ .From Eq. (26), it is clear that the real part of
$ \sigma_L/\omega_p $ is determined by the imaginary part of the logarithmic function$\log \dfrac{\omega+k+{\rm i}\xi}{\omega-k+{\rm i}\xi}$ , and${\rm Im}\sigma_{L}/\omega_{p}$ is related to the real part of that function correspondingly. The logarithmic function can be expressed by [23,46]$ \log \frac{\omega+k+{\rm i}\xi}{\omega-k+{\rm i}\xi} = \log\mid \frac{\omega+k}{\omega-k}\mid-{\rm i}\pi\Theta(k^2-\omega^2) . $
(30) In the time-like region
$ \omega>k $ ,$ \Theta(k^2-\omega^2) = 0 $ , which results in${\rm{Re}} \sigma_{L}/\omega_{p}$ beginning to vanish in that frequency region, as shown in Fig. 1. There is a singularity located at the position$ \omega = k $ for the real part of the logarithmic function$ \log\mid \dfrac{\omega+k}{\omega-k}\mid $ , which leads to a divergence behavior of${\rm{Im}} \sigma_{L}/\omega_{p}$ at$ \omega/k = 1 $ , as shown in Fig. 2.It is instructive to understand viscous effects on the color-electric conductivity from the viewpoint of dielectric properties. The fields in the medium are different from those in vacuum, and the dielectric functions dominate those differences. Moreover, other electromagnetic properties of the medium can be derived from the latter in principle. Mrowczynski et al. have found that the dielectric tensor and conductivity tensor are related to each other as follows [43,45,46]:
$ \sigma_{ab}^{\alpha\beta}(k) = -{\rm i}\omega[\varepsilon_{ab}^{\alpha\beta}(k)-\delta^{\alpha\beta}\delta_{ab}]. $
(31) If the dielectric tensor and conductivity tensor are expressed according to project operators (23) simultaneously, one can obtain
$ \sigma_L = -{\rm i}\omega\{\varepsilon_L-1 \}. $
(32) In (32),
$ \varepsilon_L $ is the longitudinal dielectric function. Therefore, from (32), the real part of the longitudinal color-electric conductivity relates to the imaginary part of the longitudinal dielectric function. One can obtain the imaginary part of$ \sigma_L $ from the real part of$ \varepsilon_L $ . The longitudinal color-electric conductivity (26) is consistent with the longitudinal dielectric function obtained in Refs. [23,24] in terms of Eq. (32). Furthermore, if the HTL dielectric function$ \varepsilon_L $ [40,41,45,46] is applied to (32), we obtain (28), i.e., the result of the longitudinal conductivity in the HTL approximation.It is argued in Ref. [20] that the electric conductivity arises from competition between "ordered" electric force and "disordered" scatterings. Thus the dissipation involving the disordered scatterings will affect the charge transport. The electric conductivity reflects the medium response to the applied external electric field. The medium properties may be involved in its response to the applied fields. Shear viscosity modifies the distribution functions of the medium constituents, which may play an important role in determining the medium response. Therefore, shear viscosity will have an impact on the charge transport naturally.
It should be stressed that when several different irreversible transport processes (such as heat conductivity, electric conductivity, and shear viscosity) occur simultaneously in a plasma medium, the transport processes may interfere with each other [89]. The driving force due to the gradient of a kind of physical quantity can result in another kind of current [89]. For example, an electric current is produced in a circuit composed of different metals when the junctions are at different temperatures, which is known as the thermoelectric effect or Seebeck effect [71]. Some authors have addressed the Seebeck effect for the hot and dense hadronic matter with a temperature gradient [90] and the QGP in magnetic fields [91] in the context of ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions. Recently, another study showed that a density gradient of a given charge can generate dissipative currents of another charge [92]. Therefore, it is natural to expect that the velocity gradient might produce an electric current in the system. As a result, shear viscosity could influence the charge transport coefficient, i.e., the electric conductivity.
With the viscous chromohydrodynamic approach, we centered our attention on physics related to the color fluctuation phenomena in QGP at a short time scale where the collision terms of transport equations can be neglected [84,85]. The collisionless kinetic theory is usually applied to study the QGP properties; some important results have been achieved, which coincide with those derived from the diagrammatic approach with hard loop approximation — the HTL approximation. We also applied the collisionless transport equations to derive chromohydrodynamic equations while incorporating dissipative effects. The neglect of the collision terms in transport theory does not imply that there are no dissipative interactions in plasma. It is argued in Ref. [24] that, in addition to the collision terms, the interaction between particles due to the mean field [93] and the turbulent plasma fields [94,95] can induce dissipation in plasma. In addition to the neglect of the collision terms, the derivation from the kinetic theory to chromohydrodynamics results in the loss of some dynamical information [24,84]. Nevertheless, the fluid equations still have rich dynamical content, capturing some correct physics of the QGP. Therefore, we can gain some insight into the physics of the electromagnetic properties of the QGP by applying viscous chromohydrodynamics.
Color-electric conductivity in a viscous quark-gluon plasma
- Received Date: 2020-12-15
- Available Online: 2021-05-15
Abstract: Several different transport processes, such as heat, momentum, and charge transports, may occur simultaneously in a thermal plasma system. The corresponding transport coefficients are heat conductivity, shear viscosity, and electric conductivity. In the present study, we investigate the color-electric conductivity of the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) in the presence of shear viscosity, focusing on the connection between the charge transport and momentum transport. To achieve this goal, we solve the viscous chromohydrodynamic equations obtained from the QGP kinetic theory associated with the distribution function modified by shear viscosity. According to the solved color fluctuations of hydrodynamic quantities, we obtain the induced color current through which the color-electric conductivity is derived. Numerical analysis shows that the conductivity properties of the QGP are mainly demonstrated by the longitudinal part of the color-electric conductivity. Shear viscosity has an appreciable impact on real and imaginary parts of the color-electric conductivity in some frequency regions.