-
NMG is a ghost-free and parity-preserving theory in three-dimensional spacetime. The massive graviton of the NMG has two polarization states and spin-2 similar to those in the four-dimensional theory. The action of NMG with cosmological constant
$ \Lambda $ is given by [69]$ S = \frac{1}{16\text{π}}\int {\rm d}^3 x \sqrt{-g} \left(R-2\Lambda +\frac{1}{m_{\rm{g}}^2}\left(R_{\mu\nu} R^{\mu\nu}-\frac{3}{8}R^2\right)\right), $
(1) where the mass of the graviton is denoted by
$ m_{\rm{g}} $ .$ G $ is herein set to unity. We consider the spacelike stretched WAdS3 black hole obtained from Eq. (1). The metric is [66, 67]$ {\rm d}s^2 = -N(r)^2 {\rm d}t^2+\ell^2 R(r)^2({\rm d}\phi+N^\phi(r){\rm d}t)^2 +\frac{\ell^4 {\rm d}r^2}{4R(r)^2 N(r)^2}, $
(2) where
$ \begin{aligned}[b] R(r)^2 & = \frac{r}{4}\left(3(\nu^2-1)r+(\nu^2+3)(r_++r_-)-4\nu\sqrt{r_+r_-(\nu^2+3)}\right),\\ N(r)^2 & = \displaystyle\frac{\ell^2(\nu^2+3)(r-r_+)(r-r_-)}{4R(r)^2},\\ N^{\phi} & = \displaystyle\frac{2\nu r - \sqrt{r_+r_-(\nu^2+3)}}{2R(r)^2}. \end{aligned} $
(3) The negative cosmological constant is denoted by the AdS radius
$ \ell $ , and the inner and outer horizons are located at$ r_- $ and$ r_+ $ , respectively. There is a free parameter$ \nu $ called the warped factor based on which the asymptotic WAdS3 geometry is determined to be squashed or stretched [62, 70]. For$ \nu<1 $ , it becomes a squashed WAdS3 spacetime, which has naked closed timelike curves (CTCs) [62, 66, 71]; hence, we do not consider this parameter regime of factor$ \nu $ . When$ \nu>1 $ , the boundary is a stretched WAdS3, and the black hole is free from CTCs. Hence, we consider stretched black holes alone. Note that$ \nu = 1 $ is an AdS3 spacetime. The mass and angular momentum of the black hole are [70, 72-74]$ \begin{aligned}[b] M &= \frac{\nu(\nu^2+3)}{\ell (20\nu^2-3)}\left((r_+ + r_-)\nu-\sqrt{r_+ r_- (\nu^2+3)}\right),\\ J &= \frac{\nu(\nu^2+3)}{4\ell (20\nu^2-3)}\left((5\nu^2+3)r_+ r_- -2 \nu (r_+ + r_-)\sqrt{r_+ r_- (\nu^2+3)}\right).\end{aligned} $
(4) The extremal condition is satisfied at
$ r_- = r_+ $ . In terms of the mass and angular momentum,$ J \leqslant \frac{\ell(20\nu^2-3)}{4\nu(\nu^2+3)}{M}^2, $
(5) where the equality represents the extremal condition. Furthermore, the angular velocity at the outer horizon is [66]
$ \Omega_+ = \frac{2}{2r_+ \nu -\sqrt{r_+ r_- (\nu^2+3)}}. $
(6) According to the Wald formula [75], the entropy of the WAdS3 black hole is computed in [73].
$ S_{{\rm{BH}}} = \frac{8\text{π} \nu^3}{(20\nu^2-3)}\left(r_+ - \frac{1}{2\nu}\sqrt{(\nu^2+3)r_+ r_-}\right), $
(7) and the Hawking temperature is [73]
$ T_{\rm{H}} = \frac{(\nu^2+3)(r_+ - r_-)}{4\text{π} \ell(2\nu r_+ - \sqrt{(\nu^2+3)r_+ r_-})}. $
(8) We can also consider the timelike solutions from Eq. (1), which are also divided into squashed and stretched cases. Although the timelike stretched solution includes CTCs, it is herein considered as the corresponding vacuum to a spacelike stretched WAdS3 black hole. The metric of the timelike stretched solution is that of the Gödel spacetime [76]. The mass of the Gödel spacetime is [68]
$ M_{\rm{G}} = -\frac{4\ell^2\omega^2}{(19\ell^2\omega^2-2)},\quad \omega^2\ell^2 = \frac{2\nu^2}{3-\nu^2}, $
(9) which plays an important role as the vacuum of the WAdS3 black hole. For the AdS3 black hole, the diffeomorphism generators obey a specific Virasoro algebra, preserving the boundary condition. According to the central charge of the algebra, we can determine its dual CFT2 [61]. Under the AdS3/CFT2 correspondence, the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of the AdS3 black hole exactly matches the Cardy formula of the dual CFT2. In terms of the WAdS3 black hole, the correspondence is for
$ \nu = 1 $ , and a similar dual description is now found for$ \nu>1 $ . This is the WAdS3/WCFT2 correspondence [67], which is briefly reviewed herein.The asymptotic boundary condition in Eq. (2) is [77]
$ \begin{aligned}[b] g_{tt} &= \ell^2 + {\cal{O}}(r^{-1}),\quad g_{tr} = {\cal{O}}(r^{-2}),\quad g_{t\phi} = \ell^2 \nu r+{\cal{O}}(1),\\ g_{rr} &= \frac{\ell^2}{(\nu^2+3)r^2} + {\cal{O}}(r^{-3}),\quad g_{r\phi} = {\cal{O}}(r^{-1}),\\ g_{\phi\phi} &= \frac{3}{4}r^2\ell^2(\nu^2-1)+{\cal{O}}(r), \end{aligned} $
(10) which can be preserved by the diffeomorphism generators. Furthermore, these generators obey the semidirect sum of Witt algebra. Based on the generators, the algebra of the charges is constructed and found to be the semidirect sum of the Virasoro algebra generated by
$ L_n^\pm $ . Subsequently, WCFT2 is determined according to Virasoro algebra. Moreover, the eigenvalues of the energy spectra$ h^\pm $ with respect to$ L_0^\pm $ can be associated with the charges of the WAdS3 black hole. To complete the correspondence, the zero-th state of the dual WCFT2 must be coincident with the zero-mass WAdS3 black hole [65]. This is achieved by introducing shifted operators$ h^+\rightarrow \tilde{h}^+ = \frac{1}{k}{M}^2-{J},\quad h^-\rightarrow \tilde{h}^- = \frac{1}{k}{M}^2,\quad k = \frac{4\nu(\nu^2+3)}{\ell(20\nu^2-3)}. $
(11) Such an association between WCFT2 and WAdS3 exactly matches the computation of the Cardy formula and the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. The Cardy formula is as follows [65]
$ S_{\rm{CFT}} = 2\text{π} \sqrt{-4\tilde{h}^{-{\rm{(vac)}}}\tilde{h}^-}+2\text{π}\sqrt{-4\tilde{h}^{+{\rm{(vac)}}}\tilde{h}^+}, $
(12) where
$ \tilde{h}^{\pm{\rm{(vac)}}} $ is the value of$ \tilde{h}^\pm $ at the vacuum geometry. Here, the vacuum geometry is found to be the Gödel geometry [65, 67]. Then,$ \tilde{h}^{\pm{\rm{(vac)}}} = \frac{1}{k}({M}^{{\rm{(vac)}}})^2,\quad {M}^{{\rm{(vac)}}} = {\rm i}{M}_{\rm{G}}. $
(13) This indicates that
$ S_{\rm{CFT}} = S_{\rm{BH}}. $
(14) The Cardy formula computed in WCFT2 exactly corresponds to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of the WAdS3 black hole. This is called the WAdS3/WCFT2 correspondence [67]. We investigate the changes in the WAdS3 black hole side due to the scatting of a scalar field, under WAdS3/WCFT2 correspondence.
-
We assume that an external scalar field is scattered by a WAdS3 black hole. The black hole absorbs the scalar field under scattering and changes with the absorbed amount of the scalar field. The change in the state of the black hole can be measured in terms of the fluxes representing the transferred conserved quantities of the scalar field when the scalar field passes through the outer horizon of the black hole. The fluxes are computed from the solution of the scalar field at the outer horizon. A massive scalar field is assumed, and its action is given by
$ S_\Phi = -\frac{1}{2} \int {\rm d}^3 \sqrt{-g}(\partial_\mu \Phi \partial^\mu \Phi^*+\mu^2 \Phi \Phi^*), $
(15) which is a complex scalar field with mass
$ \mu $ . Then, the field equations are$\begin{aligned}[b] \frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}\partial_\mu (\sqrt{-g}g^{\mu\nu} \partial_\nu \Phi)-\mu^2\Phi & = 0,\\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}\partial_\mu (\sqrt{-g}g^{\mu\nu} \partial_\nu \Phi^*)-\mu^2\Phi^* & = 0. \end{aligned}$
(16) We take the ansatz to be
$ \Phi(t,r,\phi) = {\rm e}^{-{\rm i}\omega t}{\rm e}^{{\rm i}m\phi}{\cal{R}}(r), $
(17) where
$ {\cal{R}}(r) $ is the radial function to be solved. The radial equation is nontrivial in Eq. (16), which is expressed as$ \frac{1}{{\cal{R}}}\partial_r \left(\frac{4N^2 R^2}{\ell^4} \partial_r {\cal{R}}\right)+\frac{1}{N^2} (\omega +N^\phi m )^2-\frac{m^2}{R^2 \ell^2} -\mu^2 = 0. $
(18) The radial equation in Eq. (18) reduces to a Schrödinger-type equation under the tortoise coordinate. The transformation for the tortoise coordinate is defined as
$ \frac{{\rm d}r^*}{{\rm d}r} = \frac{\ell^4}{4N^2 R^2}. $
(19) The Schrödinger-type equation is obtained as follows
$ \frac{1}{{\cal{R}}}\partial^2_{r^*} {\cal{R}}+\frac{4R^2}{\ell^4} (\omega +N^\phi m )^2-\frac{4N^2 R^2}{\ell^4}\left(\frac{m^2}{R^2 \ell^2} +\mu^2\right) = 0. $
(20) We consider the fluxes of the scalar field flowing into the black hole. When the scalar field configuration is within the outer horizon, it cannot be measured by a static observer. Therefore, the observable regime is limited outside the horizon. Furthermore, the scalar field inside the horizon is not distinguishable from the black hole. Accordingly, the scalar field can be assumed to be absorbed when it passes through the horizon. The magnitude of the scalar field flowing into the black hole can be measured by the fluxes of the scalar field at the horizon. Thus, we only need to solve Eq. (20) at the outer horizon. In the limit of
$ r\rightarrow r_+ $ , the Schrödinger-type equation reduces to$ \frac{1}{{\cal{R}}}\partial^2_{r^*} {\cal{R}}+\frac{4R_+^2}{\ell^4} (\omega -\Omega_+ m )^2 = 0,\quad R^2_+\equiv R^2(r_+). $
(21) The solutions are
$ {\cal{R}} = {\rm e}^{\pm {\rm i}\left(\tfrac{2R_+}{\ell^2}(\omega -\Omega_+ m )\right)r^*}, $
(22) which are ingoing and outgoing radial waves at the outer horizon. The scalar field can be only ingoing towards the black hole under the initial scattering condition. The ingoing solution and its conjugate are obtained as
$\begin{aligned}[b] \Phi & = {\rm e}^{-{\rm i}\omega t}{\rm e}^{- {\rm i}\left(\tfrac{2R_+}{\ell^2}(\omega -\Omega_+ m )\right)r^*}{\rm e}^{{\rm i}m\phi},\\ \Phi^* & = {\rm e}^{{\rm i}\omega t}{\rm e}^{{\rm i}\left(\tfrac{2R_+}{\ell^2}(\omega -\Omega_+ m )\right)r^*}{\rm e}^{-{\rm i}m\phi}. \end{aligned}$
(23) Note that the scalar field continues to have an outgoing case from the black hole: superradiance. This depends on the sign of the exponent in Eq. (23). When
$ \omega <\Omega_+ m $ , the sign of the exponent becomes negative, and the scalar field can be emitted away from the black hole. Our analysis considers all the cases in Eq. (23); hence, such situations are also included in our discussion.The fluxes of the scalar field measured at the outer horizon can be obtained from the solutions of Eq. (23), which are at the outer horizon. According to the fluxes, two conserved quantities, i.e., the energy and angular momentum, are carried into the black hole. The fluxes are given in terms of the energy-momentum tensor:
$\begin{aligned}[b] T^\mu_\nu = \frac{1}{2}\partial^\mu \Phi \partial_\nu \Phi^* +\frac{1}{2}\partial^\mu \Phi^* \partial_\nu \Phi-\delta^\mu_\nu \left(\frac{1}{2}\partial^\mu \Phi \partial_\mu \Phi^*-\frac{1}{2}\mu^2 \Phi \Phi^*\right), \end{aligned}$
(24) and the fluxes at the outer horizon can be obtained as
$ \begin{aligned}[b] \frac{{\rm d}E}{{\rm d}t} & = \int T^r_t \sqrt{-g}{\rm d}\phi = 2\text{π}\ell R_+ \omega(\omega -\Omega_+ m ),\\ \frac{{\rm d}L}{{\rm d}t} & = -\int T^r_\phi \sqrt{-g}{\rm d}\phi = 2\text{π}\ell R_+ m(\omega -\Omega_+ m ). \end{aligned} $
(25) The fluxes imply that the energy and angular momentum of the scalar field flow into the black hole per unit time. Here, we assume that the energy and angular momentum of the scalar field are absorbed and transferred into the conserved quantities of the black hole as much as the fluxes. Hence, the mass and angular momentum of the black hole change the energy and angular momentum of the scalar field for a given period. Then, during an infinitesimally small time interval
$ {\rm d}t $ , the mass and angular momentum change as$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\rm d}M & = 2\text{π}\ell R_+ \omega(\omega -\Omega_+ m ){\rm d}t,\\ {\rm d}J & = 2\text{π}\ell R_+ m(\omega -\Omega_+ m ){\rm d}t. \end{aligned} $
(26) According to Eq. (26), we can obtain changes in the initial black hole during an infinitesimal time interval
$ {\rm d}t $ . As the conserved quantities of the scalar field are considerably small compared to the black hole, we can expect the changes in the black hole to be infinitesimal. Furthermore, the leading terms of the changes in the black hole can be found exactly in the infinitesimal time interval. -
The fluxes of the scalar field change the mass and angular momentum of the black hole, which determine its various properties. Here, we mainly focus on the changes in the thermodynamic variables and the laws of thermodynamics.
In our analysis, the mass and angular momentum increase or decrease according to the modes of the scalar field. As the locations of the inner and outer horizons depend on the mass and angular momentum in Eq. (4), the changes in the mass and angular momentum affect the horizon location. Therefore, the initial horizons
$ r_\pm (M,J) $ become the final horizons$ r_\pm (M+{\rm d}M,J+{\rm d}J) $ , where$ {\rm d}M $ and$ {\rm d}J $ are determined by Eq. (26), and the changes are infinitesimally small, as assumed. For the first order, the changes in the horizons are$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\rm d}r_\pm &= {\rm d}r_\pm(M+{\rm d}M,J+{\rm d}J)-{\rm d}r_\pm(M,J) = \frac{\partial r_\pm}{\partial M}{\rm d}M+\frac{\partial r_\pm}{\partial J}{\rm d}J,\\ &= 2\text{π}\ell R_+ (\omega-\Omega_+ m)\left(\omega\frac{\partial r_\pm}{\partial M}+m\frac{\partial r_\pm}{\partial J}\right){\rm d}t,\end{aligned} $
(27) where Eq. (4) is considered, and
$ \begin{aligned}[b] \frac{\partial r_\pm}{\partial M} & = \frac{2r_\pm \ell (20\nu^2-3)}{\nu(\nu^2+3)(2r_\pm \nu - \sqrt{r_+ r_- (\nu^2+3)})},\\ \frac{\partial r_\pm}{\partial J} &= \frac{4r_\pm \ell (20\nu^2-3)}{\nu(\nu^2+3)(-r_\mp \nu \sqrt{r_+ r_- (\nu^2+3)}-3r_\pm\nu\sqrt{r_+ r_- (\nu^2+3)}+r_+ r_- (5\nu^2+3))}. \end{aligned} $
(28) This indicates the changes in the inner and outer horizons according to the fluxes of the scalar field, but there is no specific direction for the changes because the external scalar field can be in arbitrary modes.
Then, if the mass of the black hole decreases, the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy may decrease in the final state of the black hole. For testing this, the change in the entropy is given by
$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\rm d}S_{\rm{BH}}& = S_{\rm{BH}}(r_++{\rm d}r_+,r_-+{\rm d}r_-)-S_{\rm{BH}}(r_+,r_-) \\ &= \frac{\partial S_{\rm{BH}}}{\partial r_+}{\rm d}r_+ +\frac{\partial S_{\rm{BH}}}{\partial r_-}{\rm d}r_-, \end{aligned}$
(29) and
$ \begin{aligned}[b] &\frac{\partial S_{\rm{BH}}}{\partial r_+} = \frac{2\text{π}\nu^2(4r_+\nu - \sqrt{r_+ r_- (\nu^2+3)})}{(20\nu^2-3)r_+},\\ &\frac{\partial S_{\rm{BH}}}{\partial r_-} = \frac{2\text{π} \nu^2 \sqrt{r_+ r_- (\nu^2+3)}}{(3-20\nu^2)r_-}, \end{aligned}$
(30) where we compute the first-order variation in terms of variables
$ r_+ $ and$ r_- $ with Eq. (27) for simplicity, rather than using$ M $ and$ J $ . Although Eq. (27) is complicated, the entropy change is obtained in a simple form:$ {\rm d}S_{\rm{BH}} = \frac{8\text{π}^2 R_+ \ell^2(\omega-\Omega_+m)^2(2r_+ \nu - \sqrt{r_+ r_- (\nu^2+3)})}{(\nu^2+3)(r_+ - r_-)}>0. $
(31) This establishes that the entropy is irreducible under the scattering of a scalar field in arbitrary modes. Hence, the second law of thermodynamics remains valid in our analysis. Furthermore, in combination with Eqs. (6), (8), (26), and (31), the change in the mass is rewritten as
$ {\rm d}M = T_{\rm{H}}{\rm d}S_{\rm{BH}}+\Omega_+ {\rm d}J. $
(32) This is exactly the first law of thermodynamics. Therefore, the first and second laws are well satisfied for arbitrary modes of scattering of the scalar field, including the superradiance.
The Hawking temperature becomes zero at the extremal black hole. The third law of thermodynamics is related to the physical possibility of zero temperature. Here, we consider the third law given by Bardeen, Carter, and Hawking [78]. As the surface gravity of the black hole is proportional to the temperature, we investigated whether zero temperature is possible through a finite physical process. Note that the third law is subtle compared to the first and second laws; hence, its detailed definitions or physical situations can be violated [79]. The change in the Hawking temperature is
$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\rm d}T_{\rm{H}} &= T_{\rm{H}}(r_++{\rm d}r_+,r_-+{\rm d}r_-)-T_{\rm{H}}(r_+,r_-)\\ &= \frac{\partial T_{\rm{H}}}{\partial r_+}{\rm d}r_+ + \frac{\partial T_{\rm{H}}}{\partial r_-}{\rm d}r_-, \end{aligned}$
(33) where
$ \frac{\partial T_{\rm{H}}}{\partial r_\pm} = \mp\frac{(\nu^2+3)(r_+ \sqrt{r_+ r_- (\nu^2+3)}+r_-(-4r_+ \nu+ \sqrt{r_+ r_- (\nu^2+3)}))}{8\text{π} r_\pm \ell (-2 r_+ \nu + \sqrt{r_+ r_- (\nu^2+3)})^2}. $
(34) Given that the detailed form with Eq. (27) is complicated, it is omitted here. The change in the Hawking temperature depends on the initial state of the black hole and the modes of the scalar field, as shown in Fig. 1 with
$ \ell = 1 $ . The colored regime is the initial state of the black hole in terms of$ r_+ $ and$ r_- $ . Each point of the diagram represents$ {\rm tanh}({\rm d}T_{\rm{H}})/{\rm d}t $ for the initial state when mode$ (\omega,m) $ of the scalar field is scattered. The colors in the diagram, which correspond to the sign of the change, depict a complicated pattern. However, we can find that one pattern is coincident in all the diagrams for any parameter, wherein the change in the temperature is always positive (red color) in near-extremal black holes with$ r_+ = r_- $ . This can be verified through an analytical approach. To expand Eq. (33) in the near-extremal black hole, we introduce an additional variable$ \epsilon\ll 1 $ and set$ r_+ - r_- = \epsilon $ . Then, the leading term in the expansion is obtained asFigure 1. (color online) Diagrams for
$\tanh\left({{\rm d}T_{\rm{H}}}/{{\rm d}t}\right)$ in WAdS3 black holes with the mode$(\omega,m)$ of the massive scalar field.$\begin{aligned}[b] {\rm d}T_{\rm{H}} &= \frac{\ell (20\nu^2-3) R_e (\omega-\Omega_{{e}} m )^2 {\rm d}t}{2\nu^3\epsilon} + {\cal{O}}(\epsilon^0),\\ R_e & \equiv \left.R_+\right|_{r_+ = r_-},\quad \Omega_e\equiv \left.\Omega_+\right|_{r_+ = r_-}. \end{aligned} $
(35) Therefore, the temperature in the near-extremal black hole increases with the scattering. The infinitesimally small changes in the black hole caused by the scalar field imply that zero temperature cannot be achieved by this process. Therefore, in our analysis, the third law of thermodynamics is valid. It was ensured that our analysis under the scattering of a scalar field is valid with respect to the laws of thermodynamics. Thus, our approach to the black hole is physical, and we applied this approach to the stability of the horizon and the WAdS3/WCFT2 correspondence.
-
The outer horizon not only divides the inside and outside of the black hole but is also the location where the thermodynamic variables are defined. The mass and angular momentum of the black hole change according to the fluxes of the scalar field. This also causes changes in the outer and inner horizons, which are functions of the mass and angular momentum. We consider whether the horizons keep existing in the final state. This is an investigation on the stability of the black hole because the horizons are significant while defining a black hole.
The locations of the outer and inner horizons are determined using function
$ g^{rr} $ of the metric in Eq. (2). Furthermore, the locations are clearly associated with the mass and angular momentum in Eq. (4); hence, the fluxes also change function$ g^{rr} $ . We investigated the change in function$ g^{rr} $ and determined whether the black hole can be overspun. We assumed that the initial state is a near-extremal black hole including an extremal one because the near-extremal case may be overspun by a small transferred angular momentum. This can be shown by the sign of the minimum value with respect to function$ g^{rr} $ . When the WAdS3 black hole is near-extremal,$ {F_\min}({r_+,r_-,r_\min})\equiv g^{rr}{|_{r = r_\min}} ={ \frac{4R(r)^2 N(r)^2}{\ell^4}{\Bigg|_{r = r_\min} }}= -\delta,\quad $
(36) and
$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\rm d}{F_\min}(r_+,r_-,{r_\min})\equiv\dfrac{\partial}{\partial r}\left(\frac{4R(r)^2 N(r)^2}{\ell^4}\right){\Bigg|_{r ={ r_\min}}} \\ = {\frac{\partial {F_\min}}{\partial {r_\min}}} = 0, \end{aligned}$
(37) where the near-extremal condition is represented by
$ \delta\ll 1 $ , and the location of the minimum is denoted by$ r_\min $ . Note that$ \delta = 0 $ indicates the extremal black hole. Eq. (36) expresses the minimum value in the initial state. Given that function$ g^{rr} $ is minimum, the minimum value$ F_\min $ is small and negative. Eq. (37) indicates that the location of the minimum is$ r_\min $ . Therefore, the fluxes of the scalar field change the black hole. In the final state, the minimum can differ from that of the initial state, depending on the sign of the minimum value. When the minimum value is negative, there are no proper horizons in the spacetime; hence, the horizon is unstable, but the others imply that the horizons continue to exist in spacetime. Then,$\begin{aligned}[b] & F_{\min}(r_{+}+{\rm d}r_{+},r_{-}+{\rm d}r_{-},r_{\min}+{\rm d}r_{\min}) \\ =\;& F_{\min}(r_{+},r_{-},r_{\min})+\frac{\partial F_{\min}}{\partial r_{+}}{\rm d}r_{+} +\frac{\partial F_{\min}}{\partial r_{-}}{\rm d}r_{-}+\frac{\partial F_{\min}}{\partial r_{\min}}{\rm d}r_{\min},\\ =\;& -\delta+\frac{\partial F_{\min}}{\partial r_{+}}{\rm d}r_+ +\frac{\partial F_{\min}}{\partial r_{-}}{\rm d}r_{-}. \end{aligned}$
(38) According to Eq. (36), we can find the location of the minimum and
$ \delta $ by setting$ \epsilon\ll 1 $ :$ {r_\min} = \displaystyle\frac{r_++r_-}{2},\quad r_+-r_- = \epsilon,\quad \delta = -\displaystyle\frac{\epsilon^2 (\nu^2+3)}{4\ell^2}. \quad\quad\quad$
(39) In the final state, the minimum value is obtained with respect to the first order:
$ \begin{aligned}[b] &{F_{\min}}{(r_{+}+{\rm d}r_{+},r_{-}+{\rm d}r_{-},{r_{\min}}+{\rm d}r_{\min})} \\ =& -\displaystyle\frac{(\omega-\Omega_e m)^2 {\rm d}t G \pi R_{+} (20\nu^2-3)}{\nu^3}+{\cal{O}}(\epsilon), \end{aligned}$
(40) where the first term is negative. This implies that the minimum value is always negative. Hence, the horizons stably exist in spacetime. Even if the scalar field changes the black hole, the change in the mass exceeds that of the angular momentum to satisfy the extremal condition in Eq. (5). In Fig. 2, function
$ g^{rr} $ is plotted for given values of$ \nu $ . Our results demonstrate that the extremal and near-extremal states (red and blue lines) become non-extremal states (black line) because the minimum value becomes a larger negative value in Eq. (40). In addition, we determined that the extremal black hole with$ \epsilon = 0 $ becomes a nonextremal black hole because the first order is independent of$ \epsilon $ and negative. -
According to the WAdS3/WCFT2 correspondence, the energy spectra of WCFT2 are associated with the conserved quantities of the WAdS3 black hole. As mentioned in the previous sections, there are physical boundaries with respect to the state of the black hole originating from the laws of thermodynamics. Then, by association, the boundaries in the WAdS3 side can play a role in the WCFT2 side. We investigated how the changes in the black hole are coincident with those of the shifted spectra in WCFT2.
The shifted energy spectrum
$ \tilde{h}^+ $ can be given as the function of$ M $ and$ J $ , according to Eq. (11). When the fluxes change the black hole, the mass and angular momentum can vary as$ M+{\rm d}M $ and$ J+{\rm d}J $ , associated with a slightly different energy spectrum$ \tilde{h}^++{\rm d}\tilde{h}^+ $ . In combination with Eq. (26),$ \begin{aligned}[b] &\tilde{h}^+(M+{\rm d}M,J+{\rm d}J)-\tilde{h}^+(M,J) = {\rm d}\tilde{h}^+ \\ =\;& \frac{\partial \tilde{h}^+}{\partial M}{\rm d}M+\frac{\partial \tilde{h}^+}{\partial J}{\rm d}J,\\ =\;& \frac{4\text{π} \ell R_+M}{k} (\omega-\Omega_+ m)\left(\omega-\frac{k}{2M} m\right){\rm d}t. \end{aligned} $
(41) This clearly depends on the modes of the scalar field. Furthermore, Eq. (11) shows that the energy spectrum
$ \tilde{h}^+ $ is directly related to the inequality with respect to the extremal condition. This plays an important role in the change of an extremal black hole. Under the extremal condition, Eq. (41) becomes$ {\rm d}\tilde{h}^+ = \frac{4\text{π} \ell R_eM}{k} (\omega-\Omega_e m)^2{\rm d}t, $
(42) which is positive for any mode of the scalar field. Moreover, given that the energy spectrum
$ \tilde{h}^- $ is proportional to$ M^2 $ , its value is always positive. The change in$ \tilde{h}^- $ is given by$ {\rm d}\tilde{h}^- = \frac{2}{k} M {\rm d}M = \frac{4\text{π}\ell M R_+}{k} \omega (\omega-\Omega_+ m){\rm d}t. $
(43) This depends on the inequality between
$ \omega/m $ and$ \Omega_+ $ . When$ \omega/m<\Omega_+ $ , the energy spectrum$ \tilde{h}^- $ decreases; however, when$ \omega/m>\Omega_+ $ , the energy spectrum$ \tilde{h}^- $ increases. This condition works similar to the energy flux in Eq. (25). Then, according to the changes in the energy spectra, the Cardy formula changes as$\begin{aligned}[b] &S_{\rm{CFT}}(\tilde{h}^++{\rm d}\tilde{h}^+,\tilde{h}^-+{\rm d}\tilde{h}^-)-S_{\rm{CFT}}(\tilde{h}^+,\tilde{h}^-) \\ =\;&{\rm d}S_{\rm{CFT}} = \frac{2\text{π} i {M}^{\rm{vac}}}{\sqrt{k}} \left(\frac{{\rm d}\tilde{h}^+}{\sqrt{\tilde{h}^+}}+\frac{{\rm d}\tilde{h}^-}{\sqrt{\tilde{h}^-}}\right) = {\rm d}S_{\rm{BH}}. \end{aligned}$
(44) Therefore, the change in the Cardy formula is exactly coincident with that of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy in Eq. (31). This establishes that the WAdS3/CFT2 correspondence works well in the first-order variation.
Thermodynamics of warped anti-de Sitter black holes under scattering of scalar field
- Received Date: 2020-11-07
- Available Online: 2021-04-15
Abstract: We investigate the thermodynamics and stability of the horizons in warped anti-de Sitter black holes of the new massive gravity under the scattering of a massive scalar field. Under scattering, conserved quantities can be transferred from the scalar field to the black hole, thereby changing the state of the black hole. We determine that the changes in the black hole are well coincident with the laws of thermodynamics. In particular, the Hawking temperature of the black hole cannot be zero in the process as per the third law of thermodynamics. Furthermore, the black hole cannot be overspun beyond the extremal condition under the scattering of any mode of the scalar field.