-
In the present work, the Nilsson states are calculated for the valence single-particle states for proton
$ N = 0-5 $ and neutron$ N = 0-6 $ major shells. The Nilsson parameters$ (\kappa,\mu) $ are taken from the Lund systematics [15]. The deformation parameters$ \varepsilon_{2} $ ,$ \varepsilon_{4} $ and$ \varepsilon_{6} $ are taken from the Möller table [16] , except for$ \varepsilon_{4} $ in 163Eu. Instead of$ \varepsilon_{4} = 0 $ ,$ \varepsilon_{4} = -0.02 $ is taken to reproduce better the experimental excitation energy and moment of inertia of 163Eu.The effective pairing strengths
$ G_{0} $ and$ G_{2} $ can be determined, in principle, by the odd-even differences of the nuclear binding energies. For the neutron-rich rare-earth nuclei, their values are determined by the odd-even differences of moments of inertia. The effective pairing strengths are connected with the dimension of the truncated CMPC space. In the present calculations, the CMPC spaces are constructed for the proton$ N = 3, 4, 5 $ and neutron$ N = 4, 5, 6 $ shells. The dimension of the CMPC space is about 700, and the corresponding effective pairing strengths are$ G_{0} = 0.20 $ MeV and$ G_{2} = 0.02 $ MeV for both neutrons and protons. Effective monopole and quadrupole pairing forces with similar strengths are used in the Projected Shell Model [17]. The stability of the PNC-CSM calculations with the variation of the dimension of the CMPC space was investigated in Refs. [18-20].The cranked proton single particle level structure near the Fermi surface of 163Eu is very similar to the neighboring even-even nuclei [21], and is presented in Fig. 1. The signature
$ \alpha = +1/2(-1/2) $ levels are denoted by solid (dashed) lines. Results with and without high-order deformation$ \varepsilon_{6} $ are compared at rotational frequency$ \hbar\omega = 0 $ . A deformed energy gap at$ Z = 62 $ arises in calculations with non-zero$ \varepsilon_{6} $ , which leads to a significant effect on the energy and configuration assignment of the multi-particle states, especially for the newly discovered 964(1) keV isomer. This will be discussed in detail later. In addition, compared to the results with zero$ \varepsilon_{6} $ , the deformed energy gap at$ Z = 60 $ is reduced and the one at$ Z = 68 $ enlarged. Our results in Fig. 1 show that the inclusion of the$ \varepsilon_{6} $ deformation can change the order of some single particle levels, resulting in appearance of new sub-shell gaps. To reflect the shell changes in the exotic mass region, an early attempt was made by empirically adjusting the Nilsson parameters from their standard values, see for example Refs. [20, 22, 23].Figure 1. Cranked proton Nilsson levels near the Fermi surface of 163Eu with signature
$\alpha = +1/2$ (solid) and$\alpha = -1/2$ (dash).$\varepsilon_{2} = 0.275$ ,$\varepsilon_{4} = -0.02$ and$\varepsilon_{6}$ = 0.042.The configuration of each multi-particle state is explicitly assigned through the occupation probability
$ n_{\mu} $ of each cranked Nilsson orbital$ \mu $ . The proton orbital occupation probabilities$ n_{\mu} $ versus rotational frequency$ \hbar\omega $ of the ground-state band in 162Sm, 163Eu and 164Gd are shown in Fig. 2. As shown, the proton orbital$ \pi\displaystyle\frac{5}{2}^{+}[413] $ is blocked$ (n_{\mu}\approx1) $ in 163Eu while it is either almost fully occupied$ (n_{\mu}\approx2) $ or empty$ (n_\mu\approx0) $ in even-even nuclei 162Sm and 164Gd. Therefore, the configuration of the ground-state band in 163Eu is assigned as$ \pi\displaystyle\frac{5}{2}^{+}[413] $ . Configurations of the other multi-particle states, listed in Table 1, are assigned similarly.$ K^\pi $ configuration $ E_{\rm x} $ /keV($ \varepsilon_{6}\neq0 $ )$ E_{\rm x} $ /keV($ \varepsilon_{6} = 0 $ )$ E_{\rm x}^{\rm exp} $ /keV$ \frac{5}{2}^{+} $ $ \pi\frac{5}{2}^{+}[413] $ 0 0 0 $ \frac{3}{2}^{+} $ $ \pi\frac{3}{2}^{+}[411] $ 312.1 273.7 $ \frac{5}{2}^{-} $ $ \pi\frac{5}{2}^{-}[532] $ 778.9 400.9 $ \frac{7}{2}^{-} $ $ \pi\frac{7}{2}^{-}[523] $ 851.0 1050.2 $ \frac{1}{2}^{+} $ $ \pi\frac{1}{2}^{+}[411] $ 1617.9 1630.5 $ \frac{7}{2}^{+} $ $ \pi\frac{7}{2}^{+}[404] $ 1738.0 $ \frac{1}{2}^{+} $ $ \pi\frac{1}{2}^{+}[420] $ 1858.5 $ \frac{3}{2}^{-} $ $ \pi\frac{3}{2}^{-}[541] $ 2016.5 1842.2 $ \frac{1}{2}^{-} $ $ \pi\frac{1}{2}^{-}[541] $ 2523.6 $ \frac{13}{2}^{-} $ $ \nu\frac{7}{2}^{+}[633]\otimes\nu\frac{1}{2}^{-}[521]\otimes\pi\frac{5}{2}^{+}[413] $ 1001.3 1057.0 964(1) $ \frac{11}{2}^{-} $ $ \nu\frac{7}{2}^{+}[633]\otimes\nu\frac{1}{2}^{-}[521]\otimes\pi\frac{3}{2}^{+}[411] $ 1313.4 1330.7 $ \frac{13}{2}^{-} $ $ \pi\frac{5}{2}^{+}[413]\otimes\pi\frac{5}{2}^{-}[532]\otimes\pi\frac{3}{2}^{+}[411] $ 1509.9 1134.9 $ \frac{13}{2}^{+} $ $ \nu\frac{7}{2}^{+}[633]\otimes\nu\frac{1}{2}^{-}[521]\otimes\pi\frac{5}{2}^{-}[532] $ 1780.2 1457.9 $ \frac{17}{2}^{-} $ $ \nu\frac{7}{2}^{+}[633]\otimes\nu\frac{5}{2}^{-}[512]\otimes\pi\frac{5}{2}^{+}[413] $ 1839.2 1499.3 $ \frac{17}{2}^{+} $ $ \pi\frac{5}{2}^{+}[413]\otimes\pi\frac{5}{2}^{-}[532]\otimes\pi\frac{7}{2}^{-}[523] $ 2024.5 1872.5 $ \frac{17}{2}^{+} $ $ \nu\frac{7}{2}^{+}[633]\otimes\nu\frac{5}{2}^{-}[512]\otimes\pi\frac{5}{2}^{-}[532] $ 2618.1 1900.2 Table 1. Low-lying multi-particle states in 163Eu predicted by the PNC-CSM calculations.
Figure 2. (color online) Occupation probabilities
$n_\mu$ of each cranked proton orbital$\mu$ (including both$\alpha = \pm1/2$ ) near the Fermi surface of 162Sm, 163Eu and 164Gd for the ground-state bands. The solid blue (short dash red) line denote positive (negative) parity orbital. Fully occupied$n_{\mu}\approx2$ and empty$n_{\mu}\approx0$ orbitals are not labelled.The 964(1) keV isomer in 163Eu was observed recently by Yokoyama et al. [1] and independently by Patel et al. [2] . The spin and parity of this isomer is in both works given as
$ \displaystyle\frac{13}{2}^{-} $ . However, its configuration is disputed. It was interpreted as the coupling of the$ K^{\pi} = 4^{-} \left(\nu^{2}\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}^{-}\displaystyle\frac{7}{2}^{+}\right) $ neutron excitation and the$ \pi\displaystyle\frac{5}{2}^{+} $ [413] odd proton by the deformed Hartree-Fock model with angular momentum projection [1] , while it was referred to as the three-proton excitation state with a configuration$ \pi\displaystyle\frac{5}{2}^{+} $ [413]$ \otimes\pi\displaystyle\frac{5}{2}^{-} $ [532]$ \otimes\pi\displaystyle\frac{3}{2}^{+} $ [411] in the Nilsson-BCS calculations [2].The low-lying multi-particle states of 163Eu predicted by the PNC-CSM calculations are listed in Table 1. A significant influence of the
$ \varepsilon_{6} $ deformation is demonstrated by the energy and configuration assignments of the multi-particle states. As shown in Table 1, the lowest three-particle excitation state of 163Eu is the$\nu\displaystyle\frac{7}{2}^{+}[633]\otimes $ $ \nu\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}^{-}[521]\otimes\pi\displaystyle\frac{5}{2}^{+}[413] $ configuration state. Its energy is 1001.3 keV and 1057.0 keV as given by calculations with non-zero and zero$ \varepsilon_{6} $ , respectively. Both values reproduce well the experimental measurement. As for the second three-particle excitation state, if we do not consider the$ \varepsilon_{6} $ effect, it is a$\pi\displaystyle\frac{5}{2}^{+}[413]\otimes\pi\displaystyle\frac{5}{2}^{-}[532] $ $ \otimes\pi\displaystyle\frac{3}{2}^{+}[411] $ configuration state, which is predicted as the 964(1) keV isomer by the Nilsson-BCS calculations. Its energy is 1134.9 keV in PNC-CSM calculations, which is very close to the experimental data as well. If we take into account the effect of$ \varepsilon_{6} $ deformation, the second three-particle state is a$ \nu\displaystyle\frac{7}{2}^{+}[633]\otimes\nu\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}^{-}[521]\otimes\pi\displaystyle\frac{3}{2}^{+}[411] $ configuration state. The three-proton state with a configuration$\pi\displaystyle\frac{5}{2}^{+}[413]\otimes\pi\displaystyle\frac{5}{2}^{-}[532] $ $ \otimes\pi\frac{3}{2}^{+}[411] $ becomes the third three-particle state with a much higher energy of 1509.9 keV, which can not reproduce well the experimental data. Thus the 964(1) keV$ \displaystyle\frac{13}{2}^{-} $ isomer can be assigned a$\nu\displaystyle\frac{7}{2}^{+}[633]\otimes$ $\nu\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}^{-}[521] \otimes\pi\displaystyle\frac{5}{2}^{+}[413] $ configuration with high confidence. The three-proton state in non-zero$ \varepsilon_{6} $ calculations results from the enlarged energy gap at$ Z = 62 $ (see Fig. 1).In general, compared to the calculations with zero
$ \varepsilon_{6} $ , the state energies are higher in the non-zero$ \varepsilon_{6} $ calculations for most of the three-particle states (see Table 1). Normally, the calculations with more degrees of freedom give lower energy. In the present calculations with non-zero$ \varepsilon_{6} $ , the ground-state is lower in energy by about 5 MeV for protons and 15 MeV for neutrons. The eigen-energies of the excited states are lower as well. The higher energies of the multi-particle states in non-zero$ \varepsilon_{6} $ calculations are mainly caused by the reduced proton$ Z = 62 $ and enlarged neutron$ N = 102 $ deformed energy gaps when the$ \varepsilon_{6} $ deformation is included. Several investigations have already given evidence that the high-order$ \varepsilon_{6} $ deformation is important for the structure of the neutron-rich rare-earth nuclei [5, 8, 21].Figure 3 shows the experimental and calculated kinematic moment of inertia
$ J^{(1)} $ for the ground-state bands in 162Sm, 163Eu and 164Gd. No significant signature of splitting is found in these bands, and only the calculated moments of inertia for favored signature bands are shown. It is seen that the experimental data are reproduced quite well by the PNC calculations. Compared to the neighboring even-even nuclei 162Sm and 164Gd, a 10%~15% increase of$ J^{(1)} $ can be seen for the one-particle ground-state band in 163Eu. This can be explained by the pairing reduction due to blocking. Calculations without pairing, which are not shown here, result in moments of inertia$ J^{(1)} $ that are almost the same for these three bands.$ J^{(1)} $ of the ground-state bands in 162Sm and 164Gd are very similar, although there are two more protons in 164Gd than in 162Sm. Additional information is given by the contributions of protons$ J^{(1)}_{p} $ (dashed dot lines) and neutrons$ J^{(1)}_{n} $ (dashed lines).$ J^{(1)}_{n} $ for all three bands is almost the same, while$ J^{(1)}_{p} $ for the one-particle ground-state band in 163Eu is larger than in 162Sm and 164Gd by ~18% in the low frequency range. The 10%~15% increase of$ J^{(1)} $ in 163Eu comes from the contribution of protons, namely, from the Pauli blocking effect of the proton$ \pi\displaystyle\frac{5}{2}^{+}[413] $ orbital.Figure 3. (color online) Comparison of the theoretical kinematic moment of inertia
$J^{(1)}$ for the ground-state bands in 162Sm (navy), 163Eu (olive) and 164Gd (red) with the experimental data. Theoretical total moments of inertia$J^{(1)}$ are denoted by the solid lines, the contribution from protons (neutrons)$J^{(1)}_{p}$ ($J^{(1)}_{n}$ ) are denoted by dashed dot (dashed) lines and the experimental data are denoted by symbols.
High-K isomer and the rotational properties in the odd-Z neutron-rich nucleus ${{}^{\bf{163}} {\bf {Eu}}}$
- Received Date: 2019-03-06
- Available Online: 2019-06-01
Abstract: The newly observed isomer and ground-state band in the odd-Z neutron-rich rare-earth nucleus 163Eu are investigated by using the cranked shell model (CSM), with pairing treated by the particle-number conserving (PNC) method. This is the first time detailed theoretical investigations are performed of the observed 964(1) keV isomer and ground-state rotational band in 163Eu. The experimental data are reproduced very well by the theoretical results. The configuration of the 964(1) keV isomer is assigned as the three-particle state